Collagen Chemoembolization: Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Tolerance of cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in Porcine Liver and Rabbit Kidney John R. Daniels, Mark Sternlicht and AnnaMarie Daniels Cancer Res 1988;48:2446-2450. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/48/9/2446 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected] To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected] Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 9, 2014. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. [CANCER RESEARCH 48, 2446-2450, May 1, 1988] Collagen Chemoembolization: Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Tolerance of cif-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in Porcine Liver and Rabbit Kidney1 John R. Daniels,2Mark Sternlicht, and AnnaMarie Daniels Kenneth Norris, Jr., Research Institute and Cancer Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033 [J. R. D.J, and Target Therapeutics, Inc., Los Angeles, California 90025 [J. R. />., M. S., A. D.J ABSTRACT Pharmacokinetics of Chemoembolization with a fibrous collagen carrier was studied in rabbit kidney and porcine liver models. Cisplatin (1 mg/ ml) Chemoembolization of liver and kidney was compared with i.v. and intraarterial cisplatin infusion. Tissue platinum concentration [Pt] was measured at 2.5 h by atomic absorption spectrometry. Renal platinum retention and Angiostat (collagen for embolization) concentration were linearly related (r = 0.87, p < 0.001). At 10 mg/ml collagen for emboli zation, chemoembolized kidney [Pt| was 220 Â±SO (SE; u = 4) times contralateral kidney [Pt], and 62 and 23 times renal [Pt] by i.v. and intraarterial infusion, respectively. At 10 mg/ml collagen for emboliza tion, chemoembolized liver [Pt] was 2 times hepatic |Pt] by i.v. and intraarterial infusion. Since hepatic tumor vasculature is end arterial, Chemoembolization should yield high [Pt] in tumor (as in kidney) but lower levels in normal liver. INTRODUCTION Chemoembolization refers to the intraarterial coadministration of chemotherapeuiie and vascular occlusive agents to treat malignant disease. Vascular occlusion prolongs dwell time of the antineoplastic agent within the tumor, increasing first pass fractional extraction of drug. Additional therapeutic effect may be obtained by tumor ischemia. In liver, Chemoembolization offers a special opportunity for selective drug delivery. The blood supply of tumor in liver is principally arterial, while hepatocytes are also bathed by portal blood flow (1). The portal blood flow supports hepatocytes during ischemia and clears drug from hepatocytes but not from areas of malignant disease in liver. Chemoembolization has been studied in several organ sites, using a variety of embolie materials and drugs (2-7). The majority of clinical hepatic Chemoembolization experiences have used delivery of drug within biodegradable microspheres and microcapsules (8-13). Other embolie materials which have been explored include coaxial balloon catheters (14), Gel foam. IvaIon, and stainless steel coils (15). To avoid tissue infarction, embolie materials are generally either large enough to occlude proximal to preexisting collateral vessels or are labile and produce only transient occlusion. We have developed a collagen particle [Angiostat (CFE3)] specifically to address the requirements for efficient Chemoem bolization of malignant disease. Design considerations included degree of dwell time prolongation, distal penetration within the vascular bed, interaction between drug and particle, degree of ischemie injury, and reversibility of vascular occlusion. The Received 6/24/87; revised 12/1/87; accepted 1/27/88. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in pan by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1Supported in part by Bristol Myers Company, Collagen Corporation, and Eli Lilly Company. 2To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at 2100 S. Sepulveda Boulevard, Los Angeles, Ã‡A9002S. 3The abbreviations used are: CFE, collagen for embolization (Angiostat; Target Therapeutics, Los Angeles, CA); HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; AAS, atomic absorption spectrometry; CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II); DDTC, diethyldithiocarbamate; i.a., intraarterial. collagen particles are 5- x 75-/tm fibers precipitated from en zyme solubilized bovine dermal collagen and cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. We have previously characterized the response of canine liver to arterial embolization with this collagen (16). The particles penetrate distal to intrahepatic arterial collateral channels to the pa-capillary sphincter. Hepatic ischemie injury is transient and is reversed at 48 to 72 h by recanalization. Over the ensuing 2 to 3 months the collagen is removed, and normal vascular anatomy is restored. In this communication we examine the consequences of using collagen as a drug delivery system. For cisplatin, we establish that drug binding to collagen is limited. A renal Chemoemboli zation model is used to demonstrate the dose effect relationship between collagen concentration and drug retention within an end-artery system, while similar studies in porcine liver show only modest increase in normal hepatocyte drug deposition. The porcine liver is used to establish safe concentration ranges for Chemoembolization in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS Reagents. HPLC grade organic solvents were obtained from J. T. Baker Chemical Co. All other chemical reagents and standards were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. unless otherwise specified. Analytic Methods. Platinum levels in tissue homogenates, fluids, and in ultrafiltrates of fluids were determined by flamelcss AAS, utilizing a IVrkin Elmer Model 2380 atomic absorption spectrophotometer and a heated graphite atomizer with an HGA-400 programmer. Sample aliquots of 20 fi\ were introduced and carried through a four-stage furnace heating program. Liquid phase evaporation was achieved by tempera ture ramp from ambient to 90Â°Cover 45 s and held for another 60 s. Complex sample matrices were then volatilized in a charring step by ramping the furnace temperature to 1450Â°Cover 40 s and holding for 30 s. During this 70-s interval, automatic base-line correction occurred at 62 s, the argon gas flow (300 ml/min) was interrupted at 65 s, and a spectrophotometer-read cycle was initiated at 69 s, i.e., 8, 5, and 1 s prior to atomization, respectively. The atomization step used "max power" (zero ramp time), heating to 2650Â°Cwhich was maintained for 5 s under gas flow arrest. Integrated absorbance (peak area) was obtained during atomization, and sample platinum concentration was determined from a machine calibration curve. A final 6-s 2650Â°Cburnoff under resumed gas flow conditions was added to reduce residual analyte between samples. Aqueous platinum standards were prepared from a standard solution (1000 iig/ml in 0.01 N HC1) by serial dilution with 0.2% HNO3. Preweighed tissue samples were homogenized in a glass homogenizer with a known volume of 0.25% Triton X (New England Nuclear) and aliquots were taken for triplicate ASS determinations. Tissue concen trations are expressed as ^g platinum per g wet weight of tissue. Reactive cisplatin (Bristol Laboratories) in fluids was estimated by measuring the DDTC derivative, using HPLC. The sample extraction procedure was adapted from Andrews et al. (17). To 0.5-ml sample aliquots were added 5 n\ of 0.55 mg/ml NiCl2, internal standard, and 50 fil freshly prepared 10% DDTC in 0.1 N NaOH (w/v). The mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37Â°C,then chilled on ice. The platinum and nickel DDTC derivatives were extracted with 0.2 ml CHC13 by thorough vortex mixing for 1 min. Separation into aqueous and organic layers was obtained by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 10 min. The 2446 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 9, 2014. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. PHARMACOKINETICS OF COLLAGEN CHEMOEMBOLIZATION chloroform (bottom) layer was filtered (0.22 Aim-filler) and a 20 ^1 aliquot was injected into the HPLC. Aqueous samples were chromatographed on a Waters HPLC system consisting of 2 Model 501 solvent delivery pumps, a Model U6K injector, Model 680 automated gradient controller, Model 441 absorb ante detector, Model 740 data module, and a 3.9-mm x 30-cm C,KfiBondapak column. A 4:1 methunol:water (v/v) mobile phase was delivered at 1 ml/min, and column effluent was monitored at 254 nm with a sensitivity of 0.01 absorbance unit full scale. Retention times for platinum and nickel DDTC complexes were 7.0 and 8.0 min, respec tively. Sample concentrations were determined from a standard curve of the ratio of peak areas for the Pt(DDTC)2 and Ni(DDTC)2 peaks. The standard curve was linear (r = 0.999) over the range of 1 to 10 /ig/ ml CDDP. Drug Dialysis. To measure potential binding between cisplatin and Angiostat, CFE (Target Therapeutics), the rate of drug efflux from a dialysis bag containing either drug alone or drug and collagen was determined. Drug and drug-CFE mixtures were prepared in diatrizoate meglumine 66% and diatrizoate sodium 10% (Hypaque-76, WinthropBreon Laboratories). The iodinated contrast media were included to model conditions of in vivo administration. Dialysis tubing (Union Carbide; putative pore size, 12,000 to 14,000 daltons) was prepared by boiling in multiple changes of water with EDTA. Dialysis bags con tained 1 ml of the mixture to be studied. Final concentrations were 10 mg/ml CFE, l mg/ml CDDP, and 54% diatrizoate. Control bags were prepared without collagen. Dialysis with stirring was with 200 ml phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, at 37Â°C.Dialysate was sampled at 0, 10, 30, 60, 120,180, and 240 min. CDDP levels were determined by HPLC. This design approximates the transfer of a solute within a closed two-compartment system such that equilibrium is approached at a single exponential rate. Half-times were determined from the slope of the natural log of the difference between the concentration-time data and the expected equilibrium concentrations, namely, the total amount of drug in the system divided by the system volume. Because some measurements exceeded the expected equilibrium value, slightly higher asymptotes were chosen for calculations. Renal Chemoembolization. Rabbit kidney was used to model chemoembolization in an end-artery system and to measure the effect of collagen concentration upon tissue chemotherapy retention. Tissue platinum deposition was compared following administration of 0.4 mg CDDP by i.v. infusion (3 rabbits), left renal i.a. infusion (4 rabbits), and left renal Chemoembolization with variable concentrations of CFE (24 rabbits). Male New Zealand White rabbits weighing 4 to 5 kg were preanesthetized with intramuscular injections of 30 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal; Abbott Laboratories) and 30 mg/kg ketamine HC1 (Bristol Laboratories). Anesthesia was maintained with i.v. sodium pentobarbital in a running normal saline line. The animals in the i.v. treatment group received 0.4 ml of l mg/ml CDDP in 76% iodinated contrast infused into the ear vein. In the remaining animals, the right femoral artery was dissected free, an arteriotomy was performed, and a graded stiffness infusion catheter (Tracker infusion catheter; Target Therapeutics) and 0.018-inch guide wire (Hi-Torque floppy guide wire; Advanced Cardiovascular Systems) were introduced. The catheter was placed in the left renal artery under fluoroscopic control, and 0.4 ml of 1 mg/ml CDDP with 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, or 10 mg/ml CFE in 76% iodinated contrast were delivered into four animals each. The effect of non-ionic contrast (Hexabrix; Mallinckrodt) was evaluated under sim ilar conditions in four animals. Animals were sacrificed 2.5 h following administration and the right and left kidneys and liver were removed and weighed for total platinum determinations by AAS. Hepatic Chemoembolization. Duroc and Hampshire pigs weighing 20 to 40 kg were preanesthetized with an i.m. injection of 0.05 mg/kg atropine sulfate (Invenex Laboratories) and 0.6 mg/kg acepromazine (Ceva Laboratories), followed after 10 min with 20 mg/kg ketamine HC1 and 0.4 mg/kg xylazine (Rompun; Miles Laboratories) adminis tered i.m. Anesthesia was maintained with i.v. sodium pentobarbital in a running normal saline line. The right femoral artery was dissected free and a distal ligature was placed. An arteriotomy was performed and a graded stiffness infusion catheter and 0.016-inch Taper steerable guide wire (Target Therapeutics) were introduced. At this point, 4000 units heparin (Invenex Laboratories) and 250 mg ampicillin sodium (Wyeth Laboratories) were administered by i.a. injection. The catheter was placed within a segmental hepatic artery under fluoroscopic guid ance. Chemoembolic mixtures were prepared by solubili/in*; CDDP in 76% iodinated contrast at 2 x final concentration and mixing 1:1 (v/v) with CFE at 20 mg/ml by exchange between syringes, using a 3-way stopcock. The chemoembolic mixture was administered until retrograde flow was observed. The catheter was then removed, a proximal ligature was placed for hemostasis, and the wound site was closed with 3-0 silk. After Chemoembolization, antibiotic coverage consisted of 1300 units/ kg/day penicillin G procaine (E. R. Squibb & Sons) by i.m. injection for 3 days. Blood samples were drawn for hematological and serum chemistry evaluations at base line and at 3, 7, 14, and 21 days following Chemoembolization. Animals were sacrificed on day 21 for gross ex amination and for histolÃ³gica! evaluation of liver, gallbladder, duo denum, spleen, pancreas, and kidney. Percentage of liver damage was estimated by visualization of gross specimens and, wherever possible, by weight. Two additional animals underwent hepatic Chemoemboli zation with 1 mg/ml CDDP and 10 mg/ml CFE with repeat Chemoem bolization at 2 weeks. These animals were sacrificed 5 weeks following initial Chemoembolization, and cholangiography was performed to evaluate patency of the biliary tree. Plasma clearance of total platinum and acute (2.5 h) tissue deposition were determined in nine Duroc pigs weighing 23 to 27 kg. Platinum levels were determined following administration of 0.4 mg/kg (1 mg/ ml) CDDP in three animals each by i.v. infusion, hepatic artery infusion, and hepatic Chemoembolization with 4 mg/kg (10 mg/ml) CFE. All drug mixtures were prepared in 66% diatrizoate meglumine and 10% diatrizoate sodium and were delivered at approximately 2 ml/min. Blood samples were obtained from a venous line immediately following drug delivery and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min thereafter. Serum was separated immediately at 1000 x g and removed for AAS measurement of total platinum. Animals were sacrificed at 2.5 h, and liver, spleen, pancreas, and both kidneys were removed, weighed, and prepared for [Pt] determination. RESULTS In Vitro Drug Binding. Apparent drug binding by CFE was limited. The concentration-time curve for appearance of drug into dialysate was slightly retarded in the presence of CFE in the dialysis bag. The half-times for CDDP alone and for drug plus CFE were 35 and 64 min, respectively. At all time points examined, the presence of CFE affected dialysate drug concen tration by no more than 21%, with an average difference of 11%. Renal ChemoembolizatÃ-on. Chemoembolization with CFE and cisplatin led to substantial increases in drug retention by the target kidney. Renal and hepatic mean platinum levels following i.v. CDDP infusion, left renal i.a. infusion, and Chem oembolization are shown in Table 1. Systemic CDDP admin istration produced an equivalent distribution between left and right kidneys with 0.5% of the administered dose recovered in each kidney at 2 h. Following i.a. infusion, the target left kidney retained 1.4% of the administered dose with a mean platinum level 5.4 times that of contralateral kidney and 3 times the concentration after i.v. administration. In Chemoembolization groups, increased target tissue drug retention and decreased delivery to nontarget areas was a function of CFE concentration (Fig. 1). Regression analysis and calculation of the F statistic indicate a direct linear relationship (r = 0.87; P < 0.001) between target tissue platinum and collagen concentration. At 10 mg/ml CFE, the chemoembolized kidney retained 38% of the administered dose, 220 times the concentration in the contralateral kidney, and 62 and 23 times renal levels obtained following i.v. and i.a. infusion, respectively. Similar results were 2447 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 9, 2014. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. PHARMACOKINETICSOF COLLAGEN CHEMOEMBOLIZATION Table 1 Left renal chemoembolization (0.4 ml of 1 mg/ml CDDP and variable CFE) SE)Right Angiostatmg/ml0 deposition 0Â»gPt/g wet wt) (mean Â± (R)0.157 kidney kidney ratio (mean SE)1.03Â± (L)0.163 kidney 0.0200.431 Â± Â±0.1541.49 Â±0.2181.93 Â±0.3905.96 1.246.67 Â± 1.167.79 Â± 1.3110.1 Â± Â±0.540Liver0.126 Â±0.0150.102 (i.V.)0(i.a.)12357.510(mg)000.40.81.2234N34444444Tissue 0.0260.162 Â± 0.0440.1 Â± Â±0.0110.076 16 0.0150.079 + 0.0080.073 Â± 0.0050.050 Â± Â±0.006Left 0.0070.063 + 0.0190.057 + 0.0180.064 + 0.0080.054 Â± 0.0080.049 Â± 0.0050.039 Â± 0.0060.022 Â± Â±0.001L:R Â±0.0395.44 2.9710.1 Â± 1.2816.6 Â± 3.2384.4 Â± 22.483.6 Â± 8.66110 Â± Â±23.8221 Â±51.3 10.0 IV (n=3) IA (n=3) CE (n=3) 8.0 6.0 * 4.0 1 : E O) 2.0 â€¢ L. Kidney o R. Kidney o Liver 0.2 I E S a. O.I o.o Liver 0.0 2468 IO Collagen (mg/ml) Fig. I. Tissue platinum deposition 2.5 h following left renal chemoemboliza tion with 0.4 ml of 1 mg/ml cisplatin and variable collagen (CFE) in the rabbit. The efficiency with which cisplatin is retained within the left kidney and reduced within right kidney and liver, is a function of CFE concentration. Kidney Pancreas Spleen Fig. 2. Porcine tissue platinum deposition 2.5 h following administration of 0.4 mg/kg (1 mg/ml) CDDP by i.v. infusion, hepatic i.a. infusion, and hepatic chemoembolization (CE) with 10 mg/ml CFE. Relative to i.v. infusion, hepatic deposition was unchanged by i.a. infusion, and doubled following chemoemboli zation. Modest changes in nontarget tissue levels were also observed. Table 2 Cisplatin pharmacokinetics: effect of i.v. infusion, hepatic i.a. infusion, and hepatic chemoembolization (mean Â±SE) clearanceRouteInfusion Plasma Pt Pt deposition wt)Liver0.457 Gig Pt/g wet Pt Cone. (ng/ml) Pt/ml)3.53 Gig + 0.092 + 0.106 i.V. Â±2.38 Â±37.6 0.457 Â±0.081 0.859 Â±0.027 Infusion i.a. 3 1.09 Â±0.24 46.4 Â±4.5 0.907 Â±0.296Kidney0.660 0.437 Â±0.034 Chemoembo 0.40 Â±0.03AUC"(MK/ml/min)88.6 37.6 Â±1.3Tissue 3Peak lizationN3 Â°AUC, area under the plasma clearance curve. Ã¤-Ã¤-B-n- obtained by using ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Hepatic Chemoembolization. Drug distribution following por cine hepatic chemoembolization with cisplatin is presented in Table 2 and in Figs. 2 and 3. No difference in normal hepatic tissue platinum levels was observed between i.v. and hepatic i.a. infusion groups, whereas chemoembolization resulted in a 2fold increase in hepatic platinum deposition. At 10 mg/ml collagen, hepatic retention of platinum at 2.5 h was 4% of the administered dose for i.v. and i.a. infusions, and 7% following chemoembolization. The mean coefficient of variance between specimens obtained from the same liver was about 10% for i.v. and i.a. infused groups and 30% for chemoembolized liver. Compared with i.v. administration, chemoembolization re sulted in a 10 to 30% reduction of tissue platinum in noninfused organs. Splenic and pancreatic tissue levels following hepatic chemoembolization were slightly higher than those observed following i.v. infusion, probably reflecting inadvertent chem oembolization of those organs. A rapid early serum half-time of 17 min was observed for both i.v. and i.a. groups and not seen following chemoembolization. Consistent with the reduc- 60 90 Time (min) 120 150 Fig. 3. Porcine plasma platinum clearance curves following cisplatin by i.v. infusion (D), hepatic i.a. infusion (O), and hepatic chemoembolization (A). Peak levels were substantially reduced by hepatic regional delivery. Late phase clearance was similar for all groups. tion of platinum deposition in nontarget organs was a reduction by 60% of the area under the plasma clearance curve for total platinum following chemoembolization as compared with i.v. delivery. Late phase clearance was similar for all groups. Dose-effect relationships for liver toxicity were examined in the porcine liver model for various concentrations of cisplatin at 10 mg/ml CFE. When present, liver damage at day 21 was characterized by necrosis which ranged from focal to massive, intrahepatic fibrous tissue, and adhesions to adjacent structures. Lesions were often encapsulated with a friable core. Liver damage was scored on the basis of percentage of liver with macroscopic damage. Increasing concentrations of CDDP re sulted in a higher frequency and larger area of tissue damage (Fig. 4). Transient liver dysfunction measured by serum enzyme levels was generally resolved by 1 to 3 weeks. Minimal elevations in WBC and decreases in platelets were resolved by day 21. The 2448 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 9, 2014. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. PHARMACOKINETICS OF COLLAGEN CHEMOEMBOLIZATION 20 LU CA 6 n-3 10- 10 15 Cisplatin (mg/ml) Fig. 4. Hepatic tolerance to cisplatin chemoembolization with Angiostat (10 mg/ml). The mean percentage of liver with macroscopic damage is shown as a function of cisplatin concentration. severity of serum enzyme abnormalities correlated well with the degree of liver damage present at necropsy. Hepatic chemoembolization was generally tolerated without significant liver damage at up to 7 mg/ml CDDP. Repeat chemoembolization 2 weeks following initial hepatic administration of CFE:CDDP 10:1 mg/ml resulted in minimal liver necrosis in two animals. In one case, transient 5- and 10fold elevations in total bilirubin were observed 1 week following initial and repeat procedures, respectively. A postmortem cholangiogram showed stenotic areas to be present throughout the biliary tree. Three animals were not included in the results due to inad vertent chemoembolization of the gastroduodenal artery which became apparent at necropsy. These animals survived or were sacrificed less than 1 week following chemoembolization. Se vere gastroduodenal infarction was present in all cases. DISCUSSION Chemoembolization provides both enhanced confinement of drug within the tumor bed and direct ischemia due to vascular occlusion. The relative advantage of regional drug delivery is a function of first pass extraction and of systemic half-life of the drug (18). For several chemotherapeutics, only limited thera peutic advantage is gained by intraarterial as compared to systemic administration (18-20). Chemoembolization increases first pass extraction by increasing drug dwell time. As regional delivery becomes more efficient, however, local toxicity may become the dose limiting factor. Thus, in hepatic artery chemo embolization the relative distribution of drug between normal hepatocytes and cancer in liver may determine the therapeutic index and ultimate effectiveness. After hepatic artery chemoem bolization, we hypothesize that portal blood flow will selectively reduce retention of drug by normal liver as compared with malignant disease in liver where the portal system has been displaced. In vitro studies indicate that CDDP is not significantly bound by CFE, making it suitable as a passive carrier for this agent. CFE (10 mg/ml) may be safely delivered with up to 7 mg/ml CDDP as indicated by hepatic tolerance studies. It is suggested that tolerance to hepatic chemoembolization is improved with antibiotic protection.4 In general, transient elevation of liver function tests was resolved by 3 weeks. Higher drug concentra tions resulted in liver necrosis. 4 Unpublished observations. In the present study we have measured platinum deposition in normal liver and have used normal kidney to model the endartery kinetics of drug delivery to cancer in liver. Administration of cisplatin by i.v. and hepatic artery i.a. resulted in similar hepatic platinum levels of 0.46 Â¿tg/gtissue at 2.5 h. After chemoembolization, hepatic levels were increased 2-fold to 0.91 Â¿tg/g.Renal artery chemoembolization, however, resulted in much higher 2.5-h renal platinum levels of 10.1 j/g/g, resulting in an apparent 11:1 ratio for drug delivery by chemoemboliza tion in end artery as compared with circulations influenced by portal flow. In a concurrent clinical trial, CDDP concentrations of 10 mg/ml have been achieved. Extrapolating from the model data presented here, vascularized tumor tissue should achieve platinum levels of 100 Mg/g wet weight compared with 0.2 to 0.6 Mg/g>the range noted in several tissues following i.v. ad ministration, a 200-fold increase in cisplatin delivered to tumor. The general validity of these estimates is supported by deter mination of Pt distribution in patient livers containing primary and metastatic cancer.4 Livers from five patients were obtained at necropsy or upon surgical resection. Chemoembolization with 10 mg/ml collagen and 1 mg/ml cisplatin had been per formed prior to death or surgery. Liver computer-assisted to mography scans at completion of embolization demonstrated contrast arrest within the periphery of the tumor. Platinum deposition generally was highest at the tumor rim, successively lower in tumor core and normal liver, and lowest in extrahepatic tissues. Limited hepatic vascular capacitance coupled with increased first pass extraction of drug results in relatively low systemic exposure at drug concentrations within the range of hepatic tolerance. We documented decreased levels of platinum in serum and nontarget organs following hepatic chemoemboli zation. In initial clinical trials patients have received an average volume of 8 Â±7 ml at concentrations as high as CFE:CDDP 10:10 mg/ml.4 We calculate that the systemic exposure required to achieve these high tumor concentrations mately 50% of a typical systemic dose.5 of drug is approxi Chemoembolization with other agents, namely mitomycin C, doxorubicin, fluorodeoxyuridine, l,3-bis(2-chloro)-l-nitrosourea, and etoposide, and with drug combinations is being stud ied in a similar manner.4 The effect of antibiotic protection on hepatic tolerance to chemoembolization are currently being studied in both animal models and concurrent clinical trials. It is unclear at present what effects vascular occlusive changes in physiological microenvironment such as hypoxia, reduced pH, and energy status have on drug uptake and cytotoxicity. These considerations warrant additional future study. The present study documents a differential relative advantage in drug deposition in end-artery systems over that observed for normal liver. The establishment of safe concentration ranges for hepatic chemoembolization has made possible the initiation of Phase I clinical trials. Data from these trials are being assembled and will be reported separately. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Tim and Sue Moore of Irish Farms (Norco, CA) who supplied and cared for the animals in this study. 5Assuming a typical cisplatin i.v. dose of 2 mg/kg in a 70-kg recipient results in a 140-mg total body exposure. The maximum chemoembolic dose will be (8 ml) x (10 mg/ml) or 80 mg. Seven % regional entrapment further reduces this to a 74-mg dose equivalent or 53%. 2449 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 9, 2014. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research. PHARMACOKINETICS OF COLLAGEN CHEMOEMBOLIZATION REFERENCES 1. Breedis, C., and Young, G. Blood supply of neoplasms in the liver. Am. J. Pathol., 30: 969-986, 1954. 2. I.incieli, B., Aronsen, K. F., Nosslin, B., and Rothman, U. Studies in pharmacokinetics and tolerance of substances temporarily retained in the liver by microsphere embolization. Ann. Surg., 187:95-99, 1978. 3. Karakousis, C. P., Kanter, P. M., Lopez, R., Moire, R., and Holyoke, E. D. Modes of regional chemotherapy. J. Surg. Res., 26: 134-141, 1979. 4. Anderson, J. H., Gianturco, C., and Wallace, S. Experimental transcatheter infusion-occlusion chemotherapy. Invest. Radio!., 76:496-500, 1981. 5. Yoshioka, T., Hashida, M., Muranashi, S., and Sezaki, H. Specific delivery of mitomycin C to the liver, spleen and lung: nano- and microspherical carriers of gelatin. Int. J. Pharm. (Amst.), 81: 131-141, 1981. 6. Kudo, S., Wright, K. C., Chuang, V. P., Wallace, S., Mir, S., and Bechtel, W. Experimental evaluation of intraarterial occlusion infusion chemother apy. AJR, 143: 1069-1073, 1984. 7. I.orelius, L. E., Benedetto, A. R., Blumhardt, R., Gaskill, H. V., Lancaster, J. L., and Stridbeck, H. Enhanced drug retention in VX2 tumors by use of degradable starch microspheres. Invest. Radici!., /'/- 212-215, 1984. 8. Kato, T., Nemoto, R., Mori, H., Takahashi, M., Tamakawa, Y., and Harada, M. Arterial chemoembolization with microencapsulated anticancer drug. JAMA, 245: 1123-1127,1981. 9. Gyves, J. W., Ensminger, W. D., VanHarken, D., Niederhuber, J., Stetson, P., and Walker, S. Improved regional selectivity of hepatic arterial mitomycin in starch microspheres. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 34: 259-265, 1983. 10. Ohnishi, K., Tsuchiya, S., Nakayama, Y., Hiyama, Y., Iwama, S., Goto, N., Takashi, M., Ohtsuki, T., Kono, K., Nakajima, Y., and Okuda, K. Arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with mitomycin C microcapsules. Radiology, 152: 51-55, 1984. 11. Fujimoto, S., Miyazaki, M., Endoh, F., Takahashi, ().. Okuii, K., and Morimmo, Y. Biodegradable mitomycin C microspheres given intra-arterially for inoperable hepatic cancer. Cancer (Phila.), 56: 2404-2410,1985. 12. Ensminger, W. D., Gyves, J. W., Stetson, P., and Walker-Andrews, S. Phase I study of hepatic arterial degradable starch microspheres and mitomycin. Cancer Res., 45:4464-4467, 1985. 13. Pfeifle, C. E., Howell, S. B., Ashbum, W. L., Barone, R. M., and Bookstein, J. J. Pharmacologie studies of intra-hepatic artery chemotherapy with de gradable starch microspheres. Cancer Drug Delivery, 3: 1-13, 1986. 14. El-Domeiri, A. A., and Mojab, K. Intermittent occlusion of the hepatic artery and infusion chemotherapy for carcinoma of the liver. Am. J. Surg., 135: 771-775, 1978. 15. Wallace, S., Charnsangavej, C., Carrasco, C. H., Bechtel, W., Wright, K. C., and Gianturco, C. Percutaneous transcatheter infusion and infarction in the treatment of human cancer. Curr. Prob. Cancer, 8(17): 1-62; 8(18): 1-76, 1984. 16. Daniels, J. R., Kerlan, R. K., Jr., Dodds, L., McLaughlin, P., LaBerge, J. M., Harrington, D., Daniels, A. M., and Ring, E. J. Peripheral hepatic embolization with crosslinked collagen fibers. Invest. Radiol., 22: 126-131, 1987. 17. Andrews, P. A., Wung, W. E., and Howell, S. B. A high performance liquid Chromatographie assay with improved selectivity for cisplatin and active platin(II) in plasma ultrafiltrate. Anal. Biochem., 143: 46-56, 1984. 18. Chen, H-S. G., and Gross, J. F. Intra-arterial infusion of anticancer drugs: theoretic aspects of drug delivery and review of responses. Cancer Treat. Rep., 64: 31-40, 1980. 19. Hu, E., and Howell, S. B. Pharmacokinetics of intraarterial mitomycin C in humans. Cancer Res., 43:4474-4477, 1983. 20. Campbell, T. N., Howell, S. B., Pfeifie, C. E., Wung, W. E., and Bookstein, J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of intraarterial cisplatin in humans. J. Clin. Oncol., 1: 755-762, 1983. 2450 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 9, 2014. © 1988 American Association for Cancer Research.
© Copyright 2019