Think for yourself

Think for yourself
Think for yourself
PRICE: $NZ9.90 $A8.95 $US 6.95
How to Protect
Yourself from
Radiation Poisoning
At least three Japanese reactors have melted down and/or exploded, releasing radiation equivalent to
at least 2,000 Hiroshima-size nuclear bombs. While the spill continues to spew, irradiating the entire
world, mainstream media have put a virtual lid on the story – so that you can go back to sleep.
Read about what you can do to protect yourself and your family ... now.
UNCENSORED June – September 2011 1
“The great enemy of the truth is very often
not the lie – deliberate, contrived and
dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths
allows the comfort of opinion without the
discomfort of thought.”
– President John F. Kennedy
Can computers go insane? – Story Page 76
• 25 Preplanned Banking Brash Coming To NZ and Australia?
• 26 The Conspiracy Files: New Twists on JFK and RFK Assassinations
• 29 SPECIAL REPORT: Fukushima – The Mother of All Disasters
• 51 COVER STORY: How To Protect Yourself from Radiation Poisoning
• 62 Pictorial: Martian Anomalies
• 63 FREE ENERGY: Cold Fusion Proven (again)
• 65 The Truth About Nibiru (and Elenin)
• 69 Best UFO Pictures of the Year ... or Ever?
Much more ...
“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a
very early age, to produce the sort of character and the
sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable,
and any serious criticism of the powers that be will
become psychologically impossible.”
– Bertrand Russell
founded september 2005
Disclaimer: The articles in this magazine are for educational purposes only and do not
necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors, publisher or advertisers. Our sole aim is to
stimulate rational debate and discussion of the important issues of our time. We do not
endorse any treatments, medical or otherwise, and encourage our readers to continue with
their own research and consult a health professional if they are ill.
Publisher: Brian Jewell
([email protected])
Editor: Jonathan Eisen
([email protected])
Assistant Editor: Katherine Smith
([email protected])
Contributing Editors: Wolf Brinsbury, Tom
Brown, Gary Cook, Isabel H, Julie Smith,
Brian O’Leary, Michael Vincent
Editorial Correspondence: PO Box 44-128,
Pt Chevalier, Auckland 1246, New Zealand
Business Correspondence: PO Box 104-220,
Lincoln North, Auckland 0654
Tel + 64 9 521 1904
NZ Distributor: Gordon & Gotch 9 979 3900
Australian Distributor: Gordon and Gotch:
1300 650 666 (
So, you may well ask, what’s really going
on here? Did they really kill “Osama bin
Laden”, a stunt double (what the Germans call a “doppelganger” – a double, as
for example, a stand-in for, say Hitler), or
what or whom?
The evidence seems to indicate that
they indeed killed someone, and it was probably another Osama
doppelganger, someone who was paid to live in the compound
until he was needed – to be killed when the “need” arose, and of
course, extrajudicially.
But like the gang who couldn’t shoot straight, US government
leaders just can’t seem to make up their minds as to what actually
happened. First “Osama” was armed and dangerous, then he was
unarmed and not so dangerous; first he used one of his wives as
a “human shield”, then he didn’t. Then his body was dumped in
the ocean according to “Islamic traditions”, but soon that “Islamic traditions” thing was hastily put aside. Then, there was the
famous picture of the “top brass” following every moment of the
assassination on live TV, until it emerged by the head of the CIA,
that they had lost 25 or 30 minutes of coverage, and so it was just
another “photo-op”.
No body, shaky story falling apart at the seams, and to top it off,
all sorts of people, such as Benazir Bhutto, the late President of
Pakistan, claiming that Osama had died in 2001! And then there
was even George Bush who opined that the US had “moved on”
from trying to find Osama and the FBI not even looking for him
– and you’ve got the ingredients for another botched up lie.
Like the myth itself of the “Arab highjackers” on 9/11.
However, and this is the big “however”, none of this matters in
the US of A. Many Americans still actually believe what “their”
government tells them, no matter how farfetched the story may
be, and it’s time the rest of the world woke up to that inconvenient truth.
Facts simply don’t matter any more to people who are addled to
the point of not being able to follow anything more complicated
than a basketball score. Moreover, not only do facts not matter;
the rest of the world doesn’t matter; indeed life itself doesn’t matter any more.
This is the end of the line, the end of “history” as we thought
we knew it. It’s the end of reason; the end of rational discourse;
the end of factual or evidential arguments. From now on it’s all
pomp and circumstance, more smoke and mirrors. America has
been bludgeoned and massaged, shocked and awed (to quote the
Nazis) to the point where nothing really matters anymore.
The game is well and truly over, and until the next radical
realignment comes along that will chiropractically adjust the
human psyche back to “normality” there will be nothing coming
from the US except more lies, damn lies and made-up statistics.
The place has been living in a Disney dreamland for so long, that
they believe exactly what they have been conditioned to believe
and don’t try to tell them anything that they aren’t “ready” to hear.
4 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
Fukushima? The greatest ecological disaster
– EVER? Heck, Obama
told them it was safe and not to worry and even worse! – not
even to prepare – and guess what? They believed him! Now a
FULL MELTDOWN is happening and the US EPA has actually
SHUT DOWN their radiation monitoring.
Amazing how the “birth certificate” controversy went away, and
everything else, for that matter, as soon as he became miraculously transformed into a Super Hero by “directing” the assassination
of the goblin of goblins, Osama bin Laden.
Why, Batman or any of the other comic book (but mistaken for
real) super heroes could not have done any better. For sure!
Call it what you will – satanic, demonic possession, or simply the
apotheosis of an Illuminati germ that was planted on the Potomac
River in 1789 and is now at last bearing its toxic fruit.
The Americans and now much of the world is in thrall, and as the
song sort of goes, wakin’ up is hard to do.
Face it: Osama died in 2001, and he was working for the CIA, as
was his doppelganger.
However, the Osama story did its job: it deflected the people
from the real stories: the spewing, deadly radiation from the (at
least) four Fukushima reactors that were melting down and/or
blown their toxic, radioactive brew into the Pacific Ocean and the
jet stream itself. The reactors are still haemmorhaging as we go
to print and are more than likely to continue doing so well into
the coming months or even years.
Is this truly an “extinction event” as some experts are saying?
At this point, it certainly looks as though the cancer epidemic is
a certainty as the radiation equivalent of 72,000 Hiroshima Abombs has thus far been released into the environment.
And what about Nibiru or “Planet X” as some have designated it.
Is it a “brown dwarf” or a comet? A planet or a giant asteroid? Or
simply a figment of an overactive imagination?
Unfortunately, it looks as though it may be real and a lot closer
than some would have you believe.
And it looks as though it’s a brown dwarf, a star that has exploded
in the past and shrunk up to something incredibly dense. If that’s
the case, then what’s coming may not be entirely salubrious.
Along the way, we have found something that people have been
speculating about for many years – photographs of flying discs at
a top secret anti-gravity facility at “Area 51”. Are they Photoshopped? It doesn’t look that way, but as always, we are open to
your views on this and welcome your feedback. Anyhow ...
Welcome to Issue 24. It’s a cracker.
Jonathan Eisen, Editor
Government is an instrument of the Banksters; it
collects taxes to pay interest to the Banksters, to provide bailouts to the Banksters, and provide welfare
for the Elite
Jon: I came across this video which shows
exactly how Banking Gangsters create
money from nothing as accounting entries
in computer ledgers, i.e. legalized counterfeiting. Thus the debt is phony and interest
payments to Banksters are legalized extortion.
The Elite Bankers want mankind to pledge
allegiance to the phony debt which they
stole from mankind on
which taxpayers will pay
usury/interest eternally
until the Banksters are
brought to justice.
exist before on charging interest and using
physical assets as collateral, then that is in
reality a model for expropriation.”
When banks create money that is not
backed by any assets of their own, it is
referred to as “fiat” money, a.k.a. legalized
counterfeiting. The process of creating
fiat money by private bankers implies
expropriation of everyone’s wealth and
productivity by the private bankers who
issue money against it. The national debt
is in fact a record of how much bankers
expropriated from The People.
When bankers create money from nothing, they are issuing a claim for goods and
services that will be provided by other
than the bankers, i.e. they expropriate
everyone’s wealth and labor in the process
of creating money from nothing, at no
liability to themselves.
“The national debt is in
fact a record of how much
bankers expropriated from
The People.”
Franz Hörmann, Professor at the Economics
University in Vienna,
explained the fraudulent workings of the
fractional reserve banking system in an
interview published in the mainstream
Austrian newspaper, Der Standard, with
extraordinary clarity indicating that
information about the fraudulent banking
system is now going mainstream.
Good quote: “If one creates money out
of thin air and then passes what did not
President Wilson, who was originally responsible for creating the federal reserve,
later regretted that decision for obvious
reasons – “A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system
of credit is privately concentrated. The
growth of the nation, therefore, and all our
activities are in the hands of a few men …
[W]e have come to be one of the worst
ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the
civilized world – no longer a government
by free opinion, no longer a government
by conviction and the vote of the majority,
but a government by the opinion and the
duress of small groups of dominant men.”
This puts our fiscal situation into real
perspective – I keep trying to let you know
that we are in serious trouble and BOTH
parties are doing it although the Obamanites are the worst by far.
Also check:
– Anon
Race War Coming?
To the Editor: In 1991 I was in Australia and I was buying an Akubra from
a hatshop in Melbourne. (And by the
way, my two Akubras (both Snowy River
models) are my prize possessions to this
day. Works of art.) The lady who ran the
shop asked me what is going to come of
all the racial conflict in the USA. And I
said Americans are being driven towards
a civil war whether Americans like it or
not. It is a race war if you care to call
it that. I also told her the same thing is
coming to Australia whether they like it or
not. And, Europe will not escape this fate.
The civil war that is coming to Australia is
being brought to you by the same people
who made this possible in the USA. It
all started with the so-called Immigration Reform Act of 1965. For the same
reasons the otherwise tight immigration
laws of Australia were changed to allow
non-whites to immigrate to the great land
of OZ. To be aware is to be ready!!!
The YouTube below illustrates these
points. Watch it right away, because it
has been removed several times by youtube. Just too much truth in that film.
YouTube - Got DIE-versity?
– Anon
UNCENSORED June – September 2011 5
Doctors Pushed Smoking –
Now Vaccines
Hi Jon: Incredibly, medical doctors used
to promote cigarette smoking, as in the
famous advertising line “More Doctors Smoke Camels”. Since those days,
cigarette manufacturers have had their
day in court and cigarette smoking has become pretty much socially unacceptable.
Now, “NZ experts push for smokefree
world by 2040” (April 7). How the world
is changing! This Herald item has inspired us at
the ‘Vaccination Information Network’
(VINE) not to give up hope for a vaccine
free world by 2040, and a vaccine free
New Zealand by 2020. We are aiming
for this noble goal because vaccination is
having such a disastrous effect on children
the world over. Chronic ill health in the
form of asthma, allergies, ear infections,
diabetes and neurological disorders, including ADHD and autism, has been on a
steep increase which exactly parallels the
increase in the number of vaccines given
to children. This fraud must in our opinion
stop We sincerely hope that - like the cigarette
manufacturers - the people who manufacture and push vaccines will also have their
day in court, with a bit of luck in the not
too distant future. Erwin Alber
Vaccination Information Network (VINE)
Warkworth Ph 09 425 8842
No Nuclear Power for Oz
Jon: The political tents of Ozzland are
being overrun with Green argument to
shut down our CO2 generation – which
of course – means our Coal fired Electric
Generation is the target.
We cannot live without electric power
(well – we could – but it requires a host
of adjustments).
I believe – the ultimate aim of this
progress towards pricing CARBON and
CARBON TRADING – is a scam of horrendous proportions.
I also believe – the ultimate aim is to
introduce NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION. I am totally against the MINING
or the USE of URANIUM for POWER
Please watch this video presentation by
Australian physician, Dr. Helen Caldicott – on the effects of our current world
disaster at Fukushima, Japan. This is
outstanding material – please watch and
listen and pass it on – PARTICULARLY
to politicians.
Here is the link to the video presentation :
Here is another link (one of many) with
script info :
environment/2011/apr/11/nuclearapologists-radiation Please – please – head off any moves to
have NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION in Australia –EVER ! It’s up to you.
Lynn Stanfield,
(Co-ordinator – Save Australia Alliance)
Forced Medicine
To the Editor: Here’s the latest from the
US: A Salem, Massachusetts, mother is
facing up to 40 years in prison for allegedly withholding medical care that her
autistic son needed to fight the cancer that
took his life this year. (Autism and Cancer,
both of which can be caused by vaccination as well as other medicinal drugs).
It is all right for hundreds of thousands
of people to die a horrible death after
6 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
being treated with chemotherapy; but it’s
not all right for one person to die if that
person should select natural healing as a
method of treatment.
At this time a mother has been found
guilty for witholding chemotherapy
from her child’s cancer treatment. Chemotherapy is one of the most vile, inhuman,
immune depressing and cancer causing
concoctions that the medical industry has
dared to push on the American people
in its thirst for money and power. Our politicians have sold us out to the
medical industry, and in the near future,
we may all be subject to criminal prosceution for failing to obey the wishes and
commands of the medical authorities.
If we don’t fight now, we will surely lose
the war with this industry who is pushing their products down our throats, the
throats of our children, and even our
household pets.
The time has come to say “No!” to
to FORCED MEDICINE!” and a great
big “NO!” to the MEDICAL INDUSTRY!
Robert E. Catalano
Author: The Great White Hoax The sheeple sprouts up
Hi Jon: If you are European, at least your
governments are nominally scared of
you enough to “warn you” about about
eating radioactively contaminated foods.
Especially the green leafy veges. But what
do you do?
Here the gov’mint is both criminal, and
incompetent. They (political stooges, and
other minions) don’t bother to warn the
sheeple. After all, why bother? They are
there to be all religions demonstrate.
What’s an awake sheep to do then? Well...
convert your diet now, while you can.
Stand not in the common grazing areas
lest you ingest radioactive grass. And go
search for cows near Fukushima to see
what that will get you.
Instead, be a bit smarter, and do investigate how easy it is to grow your veges in-
side in the form of spouts. Protected away
from radioactive debris and chemtrail
There is a complete garden in my kitchen
in less than 3/three cubic feet (one third
a cubic meter/yard). It provides clean,
parasite free food for my dogs as well. It
provides all kinds of nutritious foods that
are fresh, and hugely loaded with vitamins, and tasty. At a very small costs. And
not radioactive.
The Greeks, and Cretans (no dummies
there) ate what we now call “micro
greens” (go look it will save your
life maybe) to stay alive when the nazis
kept at least one quarter of the whole
populace from starving. Sadly, one quarter
did starve...
These days the elites are taking your food
by proxy, by destroying it with radiation
(and chemtrails, and other chemical/genetic assaults).
Be a smart sheeple, learn to research.
Knowledge WILL save your life...when
nothing else will. – Clif
Censored by the BBC
To the Editor: As I was surfing through the
BBC site yesterday I came across a link
that declared: “Have Your Say”. Great, I
thought. An opportunity to actually get my
opinion to the powers that be within the
British media establishment.
In order to have my say however, it was
required that I register online and accept
their cookie to boot. After filling in all the
blanks, responding to their message of
confirmation and crossing the T’s, I was
finally a registered person, able to Have
My Say on their site.
This is what I wrote: “I find it quite amazing that the massive war crimes Israel is
committing against tiny Lebanon receives
no condemnation nor outrage from the
western media, including BBC. Imagine if
Slobodan Milosevic had committed even
one iota of such action against Kosovo.
Serbia would have been flattened and
Belgrade would look like Grozny after the
brutal Russian assault. The hypocrisy of
the West is stunning to behold.”
Well. It seems that in order to actually
have your say under the BBCs rules you
must say something they approve of. I
received notice that my comments were
being forwarded to their comments monitor for further study but as of this moment
there are no plans in the works to print
my statement. Have your say indeed, but
don’t say what isn’t wanted to be heard.
That challenges the conventional wisdom
and the BBC, like the propaganda network
CNN surely aren’t interested in too much
truth. – Robert S. Rodvik (2006)
Free Energy Charger
Dear Sir: I read with interest your article
on p58 of the March-June Uncensored in
which is described a free energy experiment to build a cell phone charger using
energy from the air – well, probably
supposed to be using energy from the zero
point field.
As an ex-electronics technician I was
fascinated how a simple diode detector
circuit which appeared designed to rectify
radio waves could actually tap into the
energy of the zero point field, so I built the
circuit. I also watched the video which
the photographs in your article came from
(the site referred to was not operating but
an alternative http://www.squidoo.
com/tesla-secret-generator seemed to
have the same information). I noted that
there were several other sites which offered information on this project - some
cashing in by offering information for
$100 and others offering a forum for
people to comment on the project.
A couple of interesting ones are http:// and
So I bought the parts and built the circuit.
It didn’t say how much aerial wire to
use so I used about 10m to start with and
increased this later to 25m. I also used
it unearthed and earthed to the negative
side of the circuit. To measure the voltage
available I used an analogue rather than
digital meter – the difference being that an
analogue meter draws a few microamps of
current while the digital meter can probably work on voltage only without
drawing any current.
terminals – certainly not enough to charge
a cellphone.
My comments on this whole project are
that it is a scam. If you watch the video
you never actually see what the cellphone
plug is connected to – probably a wall
socket. You also never see what scale the
voltmeter is on when it registers about
2.26 – these could well be millivolts or
even microamps – who knows? As presented, this is a scam presumably to sell
the information kits which are promoted
on several websites. I would have expected more of your publication than to simply
regurgitate this information without first
checking that it works. It throws doubt
on all the very interesting articles that you
publish, many of which I am certain are
As an additional comment, in the past
farmers have been prosecuted for setting
up coils of wire beneath high tension lines
of the national electricity grid and generating their own ‘free’ electricity for use on
the farm. It is a well known fact that a
conductor in an alternating electric field
will exhibit a small voltage – after all, that
is how a transformer works. We live in
an alternating electric field from power
wires, appliances, radio and tv waves, and
wireless internet modems, so it is perfectly understandable that the aerial in this
project will pick up some voltage, which
is then rectified and accumulated by this
circuit. What is not true are the claims
that it is free (line losses cost energy
companies and radio waves are expensive
to produce), that it can charge a cellphone,
that it is anything to do with Tesla and that
it comes from the zero point field.
Kind regards
Alan Willoughby
Ed Note: We published the article after
one of our readers claimed to have built
one and verified that it worked. Not being
electronically-minded ourselves, we ran
the article in good faith.
The result: very little. I was able to detect
approximately 0.2 volts at the output
UNCENSORED June – September 2011 7
Shocking pet story –
with loads of evidence
Hi Jonathan, how are you? I absolutely love
Uncensored, I look forward to buying it
every 3 months. What I’m emailing about is
actually a pretty shocking story that I think
you might like to put in as a feature in your
magazine. Please don’t decide against it
until you have watched at least one of the
following YouTube links I have put here.
It’s the horrifying truth about pet food, and
it’s backed up by many veterinarians and
other qualified professionals.
There are a quite few shocking details, but
I know you must be busy so I’ll try and
keep it quick. Firstly, did you know that
euthanised pets, flea collars and all, will
often end up in pet food? Along with pus
filled tumour meat, road kill and rotting
meat? It’s true, there are masses of evidence
supporting it (including video footage in the
link below), and it’s the major brands that
use these ingredients, usually labeled as
“by-products”. And it’s not just in America,
it’s pet food everywhere... if you look at the
pet food labels in the supermarket is will
likely say USFDA approved, and they allow
this to go on.
If that’s not bad enough, they also have
chemical preservatives added that have
been scientifically linked to tumours and
cancer and were long ago banned from
human food. Some of these are BHA, BHT,
TBHQ and Ethoxyquin.
Another horrifying fact is that the main ingredients in dry food are often corn, wheat
or rice (usually left overs from a factory
floor in countries like China, you may have
heard about a recall on some major brands
due to bad rice that killed I think it was
2000+ pets in USA)
What’s so bad about it? Well, and this applies to cats in particular, cats and dogs are
carnivores, cats are obligate carnivores, and
they both need meat as their main diet. Cats
actually get a lot of their water intake from
fresh raw meat and can go blind or die from
liver failure if they don’t get an adequate
amount. Did you know cats genetically can
live to a healthy 20 - 25 years? Mostly they
only live to 13-15 because they live off rice
and pasta-filled dry food with no nutrients,
or cooked canned food (which cooks a
lot of the goodness they require out, like
taurine. Look up “cats and taurine” as they
don’t make it themselves like people do).
Pet food companies do this because they
need to show a certain amount of energy in
the food, and corn, pasta and rice are cheap
ways of doing this.
Another disturbing fact, you may wonder
why so many vet clinics push commercial pet food products? Well guess who
sponsors a lot of the veterinary interns and
equipment? And guess who teaches “pet
food nutrition” to the students? You guessed
it, the pet food companies, mainly the ones
they sell in the vet clinics, which are just as
bad as cheaper brands.
In fact, Iams, a popular brand sold by vets,
do horrible testing on animals they keep below their factory (see video below through
hidden employee camera) the pets will often die and be used in the food. In the video
you can see how traumatised and unhealthy
the pets are. They are moving their head in
repetitive slow motion much like a poorly
treated elephant does when chained for too
long, and they are hacked at while alive and
awake for samples. I can give you many
more links and even direct you to books by
veterinarians, and figures that will shock. I
would really love for more people to know
about this, and I think the open minded
readers of your magazine would spread the
word, as I do with many of your articles.
The links below are some of many, an
Australian vet who is going all out and
making his own pet products is Dr Bruce
Syme if
you would like more information on what
pets should eat and why commercial food fails.
Marijuana Cancer Cure
Jon: I thought that your YouTubes and
citations about marijuana oil being a cure
for cancer were a bit over the top – until I
started doing some research myself. And,
lo and behold, it is, and the government has
indeed known about it for a long, long time.
In today’s news, Harvard University has
just published a study that shows that
marijuana cuts lung cancer tumour growth
by 50% – something that deserves not only
wide publicity but a serious rethink on the
part of the cancer estabishment and the
Here’s a relevant quote: “Although the
researchers do not know why THC inhibits
tumor growth, they say the substance could
be activating molecules that arrest the cell
cycle. They speculate that THC may also
interfere with angiogenesis and vascularization, which promotes cancer growth.”
Here’s the link to the story:
Here is another story from Natural News:
All the best and congratulations for your
excellent work. – Jared
Katje Pyne
Editor, What’s On + Where To Go
E. [email protected]
8 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
On the Second Death
of Osama bin Laden
By Kawther Salam
ring filter.
The fakery around Osama bin Laden is
very interesting before the background
that American citizens investigating the
9/11 attack have found that the list of
victims of that crime published by CNN
appears to be a vast catalog of false,
composite identities. They have published
a so-called “Vicsim Report” (“Vicsim” =
Victim Simulation”) which includes many
examples of manipulation of pictures and
other personal details of purported victims. Another hole in the story published
is the almost immediate DNA identification purported to have been performed.
According to this article, it would take
about two days to confirm an identification
done with help of DNA (if a reader knows
otherwise, please post a comment).
Photoshop FAIL
According to historians, during the last
year of the reign of Pharaoh Tutankhamen,
General Horemhab went on an expedition
against the Hittites to far away Syria. The
Egyptian army was defeated, putting General Horemhab in an awkward position
and his head in peril. The general solved
the problem by sending emissaries back
to Egypt proclaiming his victory. When
he arrived back home with the remains of
his army, they were celebrated as heroes.
When the truth about the defeat eventually
arrived in Egypt, the Pharaoh had died
and the political situation changed, and
the truth about the defeat became inconsequential and Horemhab later became
Pharaoh of Egypt.
Today morning, I awoke to the portentous
“news” that Osama bin Laden had been
“killed in Pakistan during an operation
of the US special forces”, proclaimed
by President Obama in the most manly
pose and and the gravest voice of which
he is capable. I first thought that I was
dreaming. Between that “news” and the
celebratory mood of the presenters on all
channels as if it was the North Korean TV
and all those people celebrating before the
White House, I told myself: If it is on TV,
then it is probably bullshit. But let’s give
credit where credit is due: at least it took
them under 10 years to (allegedly) hunt
Osama down.
The details published about this heroic act
are few until now. Apparently, a walled
house in northern Pakistan was raided
by US special forces with support from
several helicopters, of which one was shot
down, and Osama plus seven other people
were killed. Of course, “DNA proof” of
Osama’s identity was obtained within
hours, and then, “because no country
would accept the body”, it was dumped
into the sea.
One among many “small problems with
this show is that Osama has been reportedly dead since 16 December 2001. It was
reported in June of 2001 that Osama was
hospitalized because of kidney problems
and that he received a visit of CIA employees in the hospital. In December 2001
an obituary was published in an Egyptian
newspaper. And the holes in the story only
become bigger the more one looks. To
support the narrative of the US government, the AP agency first published and
then retired a picture of the supposedly
dead Bin Laden. The picture is above,
together with another Osama bin Laden
picture. If you look, you can notice that
the picture on the left, purported to be a
portrait of the dead OBL, is obviously a
Photoshop job of the undistorted picture
on the right. The picture on the left appears to be a composite of Osama’s head
and details from the picture of a cadaver
of unknown provenience, probably an
Iraqi victim since many pictures of dead
Iraqis have been published in the past by
US soldiers. It is also obvious that the AP
picture has been worked on with a blur-
UNCENSORED June – September 2011
Abottabad (see: Google map), the city
in northern Pakistan where Osama was
supposedly killed yesterday, lies sprawled
along a valley, it has about 300,000
inhabitants. The city appears to be neither
remote nor underdeveloped. It has many
schools and other educational institutes,
several hospitals, paved roads, government offices, a golf course, other modern
amenities and several big military compounds.
It appears inconceivable that Osama bin
Laden could live for “years” in such a
place without having come to the attention to the massive intelligence service of
Pakistan. Several hundred meters immediately north of one of the probable
locations of the house which was raided
yesterday lies the campus the “COMSATS
Institute of Information Technology”, a
professional education institute whose
Islamabad branch was visited on April 25
by British Prime Minister David Cameron. Whatever the Prime Minister was
doing in Islamabad, it is doubtful that he
traveled halfways around the globe to
merely give some nice speech in exactly
the school which has a branch next to the
raided house. The emissaries of empire
always afford their tribute, be it in blood
or otherwise.
Why, what is to be gained by this lie, and
what comes next?
Continued on page 80 9
Osama bin
By Paul Craig Roberts
May 3, 2011
In a propaganda piece reeking of US
Triumphalism, two alleged journalists,
Adam Goldman and Chris Brummitt, of the
Associated Press or, rather, of the White
House Ministry of Truth, write, or copy off
a White House or CIA press release that
“Osama bin Laden, the terror mastermind
killed by Navy SEALs in an intense firefight, was hunted down based on information first gleaned years ago from detainees
at secret CIA prison sites in Eastern Europe,
officials disclosed Monday.”
How many Americans will notice that the
first paragraph of the “report” justifies CIA
prisons and torture? Without secret prisons
and torture “the terror mastermind” would
still be running free, despite having died
from renal failure in 2001.
How many Americans will have the wits to
wonder why the “terror mastermind” who
defeated not merely the CIA and the FBI,
but all 16 US intelligence agencies along
with Israel’s Mossad and the intelligence
services of NATO, who defeated NORAD,
the National Security Council, the Pentagon and Joint Chiefs of Staff, the US Air
Force, and Air Traffic Control, who caused
security procedures to fail four times in
US airports in one hour on the same day,
who caused the state-of-the-art Pentagon
air defenses to fail, and who managed to
fly three airliners into three buildings with
pilots who did not know how to fly has not
pulled off any other attack in almost ten
years? Do Americans really believe that
a government’s security system that can
so totally fail when confronted with a few
Saudi Arabians with box cutters can renew
itself to perfection overnight?
How many Americans will notice the resurrection of the long missing bin Laden as
“terror mastermind” after his displacement
by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Guantanamo prisoner who confessed to being the
“mastermind of 9/11” after being waterboarded 183 times?
Americans are too busy celebrating to
think, a capability that seems to have been
taken out of their education.
Americans are so enthralled over the death
of bin Laden that they do not wonder why
information gleamed years ago would
take so long to locate a person who was
allegedly living in a million-dollar building equipped with all the latest communication equipment next to the Pakistani
Military Academy. Allegedly, the “most
wanted criminal” was not moving from
hide-out to hide-out in desolate mountains,
but ensconced in luxury quarters in broad
daylight. Nevertheless, despite his obvious
location, it took the CIA years to find him
after claiming to have gained information
of his whereabouts out of captives in secret
prisons. This is the image of the CIA as the
new Keystone Cops.
In an immediate follow-up to the announcement that the Navy SEALs and CIA
mercenaries acted in an exemplary fashion
following the rules of engagement while a
cowardly bin Laden hid behind a woman
shield when the gunfire erupted, we have
from the pressitutes that “U.S. officials
conceded the risk of renewed attack. The
terrorists almost certainly will attempt to
avenge bin Laden’s death, CIA Director
Leon Panetta wrote in a memo. . . . Within
a few hours, the Department of Homeland
Security warned that bin Laden’s death was
likely to provide motivation for attacks
from ‘homegrown violent extremists’.”
John Brennan, White House counterterrorism adviser, told reporters that “it
was inconceivable that the terrorist fugitive
didn’t have support in Pakistan where his
hideout had been custom built six years ago
in a city with a heavy military presence.”
answer, given the location, the length of
time and the apparent fact that this facility was actually build for bin Laden, and
its closeness to the central location of the
Pakistani army.”
The two reporters question nothing in the
government’s propaganda. Instead, the reporters join in the celebration. Nevertheless
they let slip that “officials were weighing
the release of at least one photo taken of
bin Laden’s body as part of what Brennan
called an effort to make sure ‘nobody has
any basis to try and deny the death.’”
As the Guardian and European newspapers have revealed, the photo of the dead
bin Laden is a fake. As the alleged body
has been dumped into the ocean, nothing
remains but the word of the US government, which lied about Iraqi weapons of
mass destruction and al Qaeda connections,
about yellowcake, about Iranian nukes, and,
according to thousands of experts, about
9/11. Suddenly the government is telling us
the truth about bin Laden’s death? If you
believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn
that I’ll let you have for a good price.
My initial interpretation of the faked bin
Laden death was that Obama needed
closure of the Afghan war and occupation
in order to deal with the US budget deficit.
Subsequent statements from Obama regime
officials suggest that the agenda might be to
give Americans a piece of war victory in order to boost their lagging enthusiasm. The
military/security complex will become
richer and more powerful, and Americans
will be rewarded with vicarious pleasure
in victory over enemies.
Copyright © 2011 Paul Craig Roberts
So the claimed murder of bin Laden by
the US in a sovereign foreign country with
which the US is not at war, a crime under
international law, has set up three more
self-serving possibilities:
Terrorists will avenge bin Laden’s death,
says the CIA, setting up another false
flag attack to keep the profits flowing into
the military/security complex and the
power flowing into the unaccountable CIA.
Homeland Security can extend the domestic
police state, abuse of travelers, and arrests
of war protestors. And Pakistan is under the
gun of invasion and takeover (for India, of
course) for shielding bin Laden.
The Israel Lobby’s representatives in
the US Congress quickly fell in with the
agenda. Senator Carl Levin, Chairman of
the Senate Armed Services Committee,
declared that the Pakistani Army and intelligence agency “have a lot of questions to
10 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
The Uncensored News
The False Pretense For The War On Libya
By Alan J. Kuperman
April 14, 2011
Evidence is now in is that President
Barack Obama grossly exaggerated the
humanitarian threat to justify military action in Libya. The president claimed that
intervention was necessary to prevent a
“bloodbath’’ in Benghazi, Libya’s secondlargest city and last rebel stronghold.
But Human Rights Watch has released
data on Misurata, the next-biggest city
in Libya and scene of protracted fighting, revealing that Moammar Khadafy is
not deliberately massacring civilians but
rather narrowly targeting the armed rebels
who fight against his government.
Misurata’s population is roughly 400,000.
In nearly two months of war, only 257
people – including combatants – have died
there. Of the 949 wounded, only 22 – less
than 3 percent – are women. If Khadafy
were indiscriminately targeting civilians,
women would comprise about half the
Obama insisted that prospects were grim
without intervention. “If we waited one
more day, Benghazi … could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across
the region and stained the conscience of
the world.’’ Thus, the president concluded,
“preventing genocide’’ justified US military action.
But intervention did not prevent genocide,
because no such bloodbath was in the
offing. To the contrary, by emboldening
rebellion, US interference has prolonged
Libya’s civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.
The best evidence that Khadafy did not
plan genocide in Benghazi is that he did
not perpetrate it in the other cities he had
recaptured either fully or partially – including Zawiya, Misurata, and Ajdabiya,
which together have a population greater
than Benghazi.
Libyan forces did kill hundreds as they
regained control of cities. Collateral damage is inevitable in counter-insurgency.
And strict laws of war may have been
But Khadafy’s acts were a far cry from
Rwanda, Darfur, Congo, Bosnia, and
other killing fields. Libya’s air force, prior
to imposition of a UN-authorized no-fly
zone, targeted rebel positions, not civilian
concentrations. Despite ubiquitous cellphones equipped with cameras and video,
there is no graphic evidence of deliberate massacre. Images abound of victims
killed or wounded in crossfire – each one
a tragedy – but that is urban warfare, not
Nor did Khadafy ever threaten civilian
massacre in Benghazi, as Obama alleged.
The “no mercy’’ warning, of March 17,
targeted rebels only, as reported by The
New York Times, which noted that Libya’s
leader promised amnesty for those “who
throw their weapons away.’’ Khadafy even
offered the rebels an escape route and
open border to Egypt, to avoid a fight “to
the bitter end.’’
If bloodbath was unlikely, how did this
notion propel US intervention? The actual
prospect in Benghazi was the final defeat
of the rebels. To avoid this fate, they desperately concocted an impending genocide
to rally international support for “humanitarian’’ intervention that would save their
On March 15, Reuters quoted a Libyan
opposition leader in Geneva claiming
that if Khadafy attacked Benghazi, there
would be “a real bloodbath, a massacre
like we saw in Rwanda.’’ Four days later,
US military aircraft started bombing. By
the time Obama claimed that intervention
had prevented a bloodbath, The New York
Times already had reported that “the rebels
feel no loyalty to the truth in shaping their
propaganda’’ against Khadafy and were
“making vastly inflated claims of his bar-
UNCENSORED June – September 2011
baric behavior.’’
It is hard to know whether the White
House was duped by the rebels or conspired with them to pursue regime-change
on bogus humanitarian grounds. In either
case, intervention quickly exceeded the
UN mandate of civilian protection by
bombing Libyan forces in retreat or based
in bastions of Khadafy support, such as
Sirte, where they threatened no civilians.
The net result is uncertain. Intervention
stopped Khadafy’s forces from capturing Benghazi, saving some lives. But
it intensified his crackdown in western
Libya to consolidate territory quickly. It
also emboldened the rebels to resume their
attacks, briefly recapturing cities along the
eastern and central coast, such as Ajdabiya, Brega, and Ras Lanuf, until they
outran supply lines and retreated.
Each time those cities change hands, they
are shelled by both sides – killing, wounding, and displacing innocents. On March
31, NATO formally warned the rebels
to stop attacking civilians. It is poignant
to recall that if not for intervention, the
war almost surely would have ended last
In his speech explaining the military
action in Libya, Obama embraced the
noble principle of the responsibility to
protect – which some quickly dubbed the
Obama Doctrine – calling for intervention
when possible to prevent genocide. Libya
reveals how this approach, implemented
reflexively, may backfire by encouraging
rebels to provoke and exaggerate atrocities, to entice intervention that ultimately
perpetuates civil war and humanitarian
About the Author
Alan J. Kuperman, a professor of public
affairs at the University of Texas, is author
of The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention’ and co-editor of Gambling on
Humanitarian Intervention. 11
Libya: All About
Central Banking?
By Ellen Brown
April 13, 2011 (Asia Times)
Several writers have noted the odd fact
that the Libyan rebels took time out from
their rebellion in March to create their own
central bank – this before they even had a
government. Robert Wenzel wrote in the
Economic Policy Journal:
I have never before heard of a central bank
being created in just a matter of weeks out
of a popular uprising. This suggests we have
a bit more than a rag tag bunch of rebels
running around and that there are some
pretty sophisticated influences.
Alex Newman wrote in the New American:
“In a statement released last week, the
rebels reported on the results of a meeting
held on March 19. Among other things, the
supposed rag-tag revolutionaries announced
the “[d]esignation of the Central Bank of
Benghazi as a monetary authority competent
in monetary policies in Libya and appointment of a Governor to the Central Bank of
Libya, with a temporary headquarters in
Newman quoted CNBC senior editor John
Carney, who asked, “Is this the first time a
revolutionary group has created a central
bank while it is still in the midst of fighting
the entrenched political power? It certainly
seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our
Another anomaly involves the official
justification for taking up arms against
Libya. Supposedly it’s about human rights
violations, but the evidence is contradictory.
According to an article on the Fox News
website on February 28:
As the United Nations works feverishly
to condemn Libyan leader Muammar alQaddafi for cracking down on protesters,
the body’s Human Rights Council is poised
to adopt a report chock-full of praise for
Libya’s human rights record.
The review commends Libya for improving educational opportunities, for making
human rights a “priority” and for bettering
its “constitutional” framework. Several
countries, including Iran, Venezuela, North
Korea, and Saudi Arabia but also Canada,
give Libya positive marks for the legal
protections afforded to its citizens – who are
now revolting against the regime and facing
bloody reprisal.
Whatever might be said of Gaddafi’s personal crimes, the Libyan people seem to be
thriving. A delegation of medical professionals from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
wrote in an appeal to Russian President
Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister
Vladimir Putin that after becoming acquainted with Libyan life, it was their view
that in few nations did people live in such
[Libyans] are entitled to free treatment,
and their hospitals provide the best in the
world of medical equipment. Education in
Libya is free, capable young people have the
opportunity to study abroad at government
expense. When marrying, young couples
receive 60,000 Libyan dinars (about 50,000
US dollars) of financial assistance. Due to
government subsidies the price of cars is
much lower than in Europe, and they are
affordable for every family. Gasoline and
bread cost a penny, no taxes for those who
are engaged in agriculture. The Libyan people are quiet and peaceful, are not inclined
to drink, and are very religious.
They maintained that the international community had been misinformed about the
struggle against the regime. “Tell us,” they
said, “who would not like such a regime?”
Even if that is just propaganda, there is no
denying at least one very popular achievement of the Libyan government: it brought
water to the desert by building the largest
and most expensive irrigation project in
history, the US$33 billion GMMR (Great
Man-Made River) project. Even more than
oil, water is crucial to life in Libya.
The GMMR provides 70% of the population with water for drinking and irrigation,
pumping it from Libya’s vast underground
Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System in the
south to populated coastal areas 4,000 kilometers to the north. The Libyan government
has done at least some things right.
Another explanation for the assault on
Libya is that it is “all about oil”, but that
theory too is problematic. As noted in the
National Journal, the country produces only
about 2% of the world’s oil. Saudi Arabia
alone has enough spare capacity to make up
for any lost production if Libyan oil were
to disappear from the market. And if it’s
all about oil, why the rush to set up a new
central bank?
Another provocative bit of data circulating
on the Net is a 2007 “Democracy Now” interview of US General Wesley Clark (Ret).
In it he says that about 10 days after September 11, 2001, he was told by a general
that the decision had been made to go to war
with Iraq. Clark was surprised and asked
12 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
why. “I don’t know!” was the response. “I
guess they don’t know what else to do!”
Later, the same general said they planned to
take out seven countries in five years: Iraq,
Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and
What do these seven countries have in
common? In the context of banking, one
that sticks out is that none of them is listed
among the 56 member banks of the Bank
for International Settlements (BIS). That
evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers’ central bank
in Switzerland.
The most renegade of the lot could be Libya
and Iraq, the two that have actually been
attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr, writing on, noted that “[s]ix months
before the US moved into Iraq to take down
Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made
the move to accept euros instead of dollars
for oil, and this became a threat to the global
dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar.”
According to a Russian article titled “Bombing of Libya – Punishment for Ghaddafi for
His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar”, Gaddafi
made a similarly bold move: he initiated a
movement to refuse the dollar and the euro,
and called on Arab and African nations to
use a new currency instead, the gold dinar.
Gaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people
using this single currency.
During the past year, the idea was approved
by many Arab countries and most African
countries. The only opponents were the
Republic of South Africa and the head of
the League of Arab States. The initiative
was viewed negatively by the USA and the
European Union, with French President
Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the
financial security of mankind; but Gaddafi
was not swayed and continued his push for
the creation of a united Africa.
And that brings us back to the puzzle of the
Libyan central bank. In an article posted on
the Market Oracle, Eric Encina observed:
“One seldom-mentioned fact by western
politicians and media pundits: the Central
Bank of Libya is 100% State owned. Currently, the Libyan government creates its
own money, the Libyan Dinar, through the
facilities of its own central bank. Few can
argue that Libya is a sovereign nation with
its own great resources, able to sustain its
own economic destiny. One major problem
for globalist banking cartels is that in order
to do business with Libya, they must go
through the Libyan Central Bank and its
national currency, a place where they have
absolutely zero dominion or power-broking
ability. Hence, taking down the Central
Bank of Libya (CBL) may not appear in the
speeches of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy
but this is certainly at the top of the globalist
agenda for absorbing Libya into its hive of
compliant nations.
Libya not only has oil. According to the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), its central bank has nearly 144 tonnes of gold in
its vaults. With that sort of asset base, who
needs the BIS, the IMF and their rules?
All of which prompts a closer look at the
BIS rules and their effect on local economies. An article on the BIS website states
that central banks in the Central Bank
Governance Network are supposed to have
as their single or primary objective “to preserve price stability”.
They are to be kept independent from government to make sure that political considerations don’t interfere with this mandate.
“Price stability” means maintaining a stable
money supply, even if that means burdening
the people with heavy foreign debts. Central
banks are discouraged from increasing the
money supply by printing money and using
it for the benefit of the state, either directly
or as loans.
In a 2002 article in Asia Times Online titled
“The BIS vs national banks” Henry Liu
maintained: “BIS regulations serve only the
single purpose of strengthening the international private banking system, even at the
peril of national economies. The BIS does to
national banking systems what the IMF has
done to national monetary regimes. National
economies under financial globalization no
longer serve national interests.
“... FDI [foreign direct investment] denominated in foreign currencies, mostly dollars,
has condemned many national economies
into unbalanced development toward export,
merely to make dollar-denominated interest
payments to FDI, with little net benefit to
the domestic economies.
He added, “Applying the State Theory of
Money, any government can fund with its
own currency all its domestic developmental needs to maintain full employment without inflation.” The “state theory of money”
refers to money created by governments
rather than private banks.
The presumption of the rule against borrowing from the government’s own central bank
is that this will be inflationary, while borrowing existing money from foreign banks
or the IMF will not. But all banks actually
create the money they lend on their books,
whether publicly owned or privately owned.
Most new money today comes from bank
loans. Borrowing it from the government’s
own central bank has the advantage that the
loan is effectively interest-free. Eliminating
interest has been shown to reduce the cost
of public projects by an average of 50%.
And that appears to be how the Libyan
system works. According to Wikipedia, the
functions of the Central Bank of Libya include “issuing and regulating banknotes and
coins in Libya” and “managing and issuing
all state loans”. Libya’s wholly state-owned
bank can and does issue the national currency and lend it for state purposes.
The Truth
About Libya
That would explain where Libya gets the
money to provide free education and medical care, and to issue each young couple
$50,000 in interest-free state loans. It would
also explain where the country found the
$33 billion to build the Great Man-Made
River project. Libyans are worried that
North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led air
strikes are coming perilously close to this
pipeline, threatening another humanitarian
So is this new war all about oil or all about
banking? Maybe both – and water as well.
With energy, water, and ample credit to
develop the infrastructure to access them,
a nation can be free of the grip of foreign
creditors. And that may be the real threat
of Libya: it could show the world what is
Most countries don’t have oil, but new
technologies are being developed that could
make non-oil-producing nations energyindependent, particularly if infrastructure
costs are halved by borrowing from the
nation’s own publicly owned bank. Energy
independence would free governments from
the web of the international bankers, and of
the need to shift production from domestic
to foreign markets to service the loans.
If the Gaddafi government goes down, it
will be interesting to watch whether the new
central bank joins the BIS, whether the nationalized oil industry gets sold off to investors, and whether education and healthcare
continue to be free.
About the author:
Ellen Brown is an attorney and president of
the Public Banking Institute, In Web of
Debt, her latest of eleven books, she shows
how a private cartel has usurped the power
to create money from the people themselves,
and how we the people can get it back. Her
websites are
UNCENSORED June – September 2011
By Stephen Goodson
April 4, 2011
Colonel Muammar Gadaffi is frequently
referred to in the media as a “mad
dictator” and “bloody tyrant”, but do these
allegations accord with the facts?
Libya consists of over 150 tribes, with the
two main groups, the Meghabra
living in Tripolitania in the west and the
Wafallah living in Cyrenaica in the
east. Previous attempts to unite these
tribes by the Turkish (1855-1911) and
ltalian (1911-43) colonial rulers failed and
the country was split in two for
administrative purposes.
Oil was discovered in Libya in 1959, but
King ldris of the Senussi tribe allowed
most of the oil profits to be siphoned
into the coffers of the oil companies. The
coup d’etat on 1 September 1969 led by
Colonel Gadaffi had countrywide support.
He subsequently married a woman from
the royal Barqa tribe and adroitly unified
the nation.
By retaining Libya’s oil wealth for the
benefit of all its people, Gadaffi had
created a socialist paradise. There is no
unemployment, Libya has the highest
GDP in Africa, less than 5% of the population is classified as poor and it has
fewer people living below the poverty 13
datum line than, for example, Holland.
Life expectancy is 75 years and is the
highest in Africa and 10% above the
world average.
With the exception of the nomadic Bedouin and Tuareg tribes, most Libyan
families possess a house and a car. There
is free health care and education and
not surprisingly Libya has a literacy rate
of 82%. Last year Gadaffi distributed $500
to each man, woman and child (population
6.5 million).
Libya has a tolerable human rights record
and stands at 61 on the International
Incarceration Index, comparable with
countries in central Europe (the lower the
rating, the lower the standing – the USA
occupies the no.1 spot!). There is
hardly any crime and only rebels and traitors are dealt with harshly.
Anyone who has read Gadaffi’s Little
Green Book will realise that he is a
thoughtful and enlightened leader. Libya
has been accused of having committed
numerous acts of terrorism in the past, but
many of these have been perpetrated
by foreign intelligence agencies as false
flag operations – the Lockerbie bombing
being a prime example.
The CIA and MI6 and their frontmen have
been stoking up dissent in the east of
the country for almost 30 years. Libya
produces exceptionally high quality
light crude oil and its production cost of
$1 a barrel, is the lowest in the world.
Riba (usury) is not permitted. The Central
bank of Libya is wholly-owned by
the Libyan Government and is run as a
state bank, issuing all government loans
free of interest. This is in contrast to the
exploitative fractional reserve banking
system of the West. The no-fly zone and
the bombing of Libya have nothing to do
with the protection of civilians. It is an act
of war a blatant and crude attempt by the
oil corporations and international bankers
to steal the wealth of Libya.
Icelanders Refuse
To Sell Themselves
Into Slavery –
Iceland Won’t Pay
For Bankers’ Sins
By Al-Jazeera
The UK and the Netherlands are set to sue
Iceland after voters there rejected a debt
repayment plan over collapsed bank
Icesave. British and Dutch depositors
were bailed out by their governments,
which are now demanding the $3.5bn
Rory Challands reports from Reykjavic,
Iceland’s capital.
Icelandic voters reject Icesave
debt repayment plan
Prime minister says the ‘worst option was
chosen’ after 60% of voters in referendum
oppose £3bn repayment
By Agencies in Reykjavik
April 10, 2011 The Guardian – Icelanders have rejected the latest governmentapproved plan to repay the £3bn owed to
Britain and the Netherlands from the crash
of the country’s banking system in 2008,
prompting the prime minister to warn of
economic and political chaos.
Final results from five of six constituencies, including the capital, Reykjavik,
showed the “no” side taking nearly 60%
of the vote, meaning the dispute is likely
to end up in a European court.
“The worst option was chosen,” said the
prime minister, Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir.
“The vote has split the nation in two. We
must do all we can to prevent political
and economic chaos as a result of this
Iceland rejected an earlier Icesave repayment blueprint in a referendum.
Economists say uncertainty over the payback deal is hurting efforts to drag Iceland
out of recession, end currency controls
and boost investment. Many voters cited
opposition to taxpayers footing the bill for
irresponsible bankers as their reason for
voting against the plan.
“I know this will probably hurt us internationally, but it is worth taking a stance,”
said Thorgerdun Ásgeirsdóttir, a 28-yearold barista, after casting a “no” vote.
Svanhvit Ingibergs, 33, who works at a
rest home, said: “I had no part in causing
those debts, and I don’t want our children
to risk having to pay them. It would be
better to settle this in a court.”
Sigurðardóttir said Iceland would now
defend its case before the court of the
European trade body overseeing Iceland’s co-operation with the EU, the Efta
Surveillance Authority (ESA). Economists have said this route could be much
Iceland is still pulling itself out of a deep
recession. Politicians and economists believe solving the Icesave issue would help
the country get back into international
financial markets. Getting such funding is
also part of a plan to end the controls on
capital flows it imposed in 2008 to stabilise a tumbling currency.
The controls have left an estimated
equivalent to a quarter of Iceland’s gross
domestic product in the hands of foreign
investors, many of whom are expected
to want to pull out. Ratings agencies
will have followed the vote closely, with
Moody’s having said it may lower its
credit rating on Iceland after a “no” vote.
The debt was incurred when Britain and
the Netherlands compensated their nationals who lost savings in online Icesave
accounts owned by Landsbanki, one of
three Icelandic banks that collapsed in late
Icelandic politicians in February backed
a repayment plan agreed with creditors,
but the president refused to sign the bill,
triggering the vote. In March last year,
14 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
Whistleblower claims it was “MURDER”. Is that why the company doesn”t want to “fully
participate in the inquiry”?
By Penny Bright
April 7, 2011
Was it “MURDER” at Pike River Mine?
Is that why the company isn’t “facing up to
its responsibilities” and apparently trying to
dodge fronting up to the Royal Commission
of inquiry into the Pike River disaster, in a
proper way?
“Pike River Coal lawyer Stacey Shortall
said the company could not afford to fully
participate in the inquiry. She said the company did not have the money to prepare the
documents and witness statements the commission had requested and would have legal
representation at only some hearings.”
“Whistle-blowing” author of Murder at Pike
River Mine, Jacob Cohen, sent me hard copies of his work, with additional hard copy
evidence to support his extremely disturbing
Essentially, the allegation is that the Pike
River mining disaster was deliberate, that
the 29 miners were murdered, in order to
help build support for open-cast mining,
which can then be argued to be “safer” than
underground mining, thus help open up New
Zealand for international mining companies.
Here are some excerpts, which focus on
Jacob Cohen’s allegation of “safety negligence” at Pike River Mine:
Chapter Two: “Pike River Coal Mine
Explosion & Safety Negligence”
According to news reports, the giant methane explosion in the mine occurred around
3.15pm ± 3.30pm on Friday,19 November
2010. Quite simply, it was massive. The
force of the explosion blew out of a 110
meter deep ventilation shaft and blackened
the surrounding bush 60 meters away from
the shaft portal.
It also blew over 2km down the main access tunnel and was recorded by a CCTV
camera at the portal blasting outwards for
52 seconds, so remarkably, there must have
been an enormous, undetected buildup of
methane in the mine prior to the explosion,
but no warnings or alarms for the miners
ever sounded.
Clearly, there was no proper fixed methane
gas detection monitoring system in the mine
connected to alarms, or if there was the
system was not working. It seems there also
was no monitoring system to the office outside for 24 hour constant surveillance either.
All this is rather strange, since strategically
located gas detectors are now a standard
requirement in all Australian and US underground coal mines.
There are strict requirements to provide
extensive gas monitoring, safety and health
management systems in all Australian mines
in which the CEO, Peter Whittall, has been
trained and worked.
Why were there none working?
The first reports of an explosion were at
3.45pm and management was not even
aware that there had been an explosion until
around 4.10pm, nearly a half an hour after
the estimated time of the explosion!
This is much more than extreme negligence.
Gas detectors are also available for miners as well that are lightweight, shock and
vibration resistant, simple to operate, self
calibrating, will not ignite coal dust, provide
instant gas analysis, and provide REMOTE
These detectors are also invaluable in mine
rescue operations.
Today there is simply no excuse for any,
properly run, safety conscious, coal mine
company to have any explosion at all!
For example, there are strict requirements
for alternative electricity supply, continuous
gas monitoring of both portable and fixed
methane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide
and oxygen gas detectors in all underground
coal mines in Queensland, Australia, and
they are all clearly outlined in the Queensland Coal Mining Safety and Health Regulation 2001 (still in force as at 1st October
These regulations also specify precise locations of detectors and alarms, an under-
UNCENSORED June – September 2011
ground mine manager who is designated to
acknowledge alarms, and at least one person
must be on the surface at all times monitoring the situation when at least one person is
The regulations also provide precise safety
requirements for the site senior executive to
follow, including the monitoring of auxiliary
or booster fans which are to be protected by
methane detectors connected to audible and
visible alarms that trip the electricity supply to the fans when the gas concentration
exceeds 2%. See: www.legislation.qld.
According to all news reports, the Pike River
Mine explosion was discovered by a mine
electrician, Russell Smith, who went into
the mine to investigate a power outage, and
was hit by the mine blast about 1km into
the access tunnel. In the United States, it
is well known by all executives in the coal
mine industry that Federal Mining Regulations require that all personnel must begin
evacuating a mine within 15 minutes of a fan
Since the power stoppage had occurred long
before the explosion, it may have caused the
ventilation fans to stop, causing the methane gas levels to build up to dangerously
explosive levels very quickly, thus causing
the explosion.
Had the workers stopped and evacuated the
mine immediately the power outage had occurred as they should have within the wellknown recommended safety period, they
would never have been killed, and probably
there never would have been an explosion.
All underground coalmines in the US and
Australia must have secondary power supply.
According to reports, remarkably, Pike
River Mine Ltd had no proper gas monitoring system, no auxiliary power supply, and
obviously no safety plan to evacuate the
mine following a power failure, accident or
This is just for “starters”! There is more... a
whole LOT more!
I strongly recommend that you make the
time to read the whole report, from beginning to end with an “open mind”.
Then ask yourself if there may indeed be
good reasons other than alleged “financial
hardship”, behind the Pike River Mine
company not wanting to “fully participate in
the inquiry”?
Penny Bright is a Court-recognised “Public
Watchdog” and anti-corruption campaigner”. 15
Is PM John Key Set to Profit from
Oil Drilling Off NZ’s Shores?
The New Zealand government's decision to open up NZ waters to foreign oil
companies is meeting with concerted opposition from New Zealanders determined
to protect their natural environment from
potentially devastating oil contamination
like the Deep Water Horizon disaster that
caused massive contamination of the Gulf
of Mexico in 2010.
A flotilla of boats set off from Auckland
on March 27 in response to a call for help
from East Cape iwi [tribe] Te Whanau a
Apanui to help them protect their ancestral
fisheries from oil exploration by oil giant
Petrobras, which is part owned by the Brazilian government. At the time Petrobras
was conducting seismic surveys in the
Raukuamara basin off the East Cape of the
North Island of New Zealand.
A coalition of different groups
including Greenpeace, Forest and
Bird, anti-mining group Coromandel Watchdog, The Coal Action
Network (CAN) and climate action
group 350 Aotearoa have pledged
support for the campaign to resist or
stop oil exploration and exploitation
off the coast of New Zealand.
Greenpeace reported that the
captain of the Orient Explorer had
confirmed that he had received
radio messages from Greenpeace
New Zealand Climate Campaigner
Vanessa Atkinson requesting him to cease
surveying and leave the area.
On April 10, activists disrupted the testing
process by swimming into the path of the
oil survey ship Orient Explorer, causing
the ship to divert from its course.
Rikirangi Gage, spokesperson for Te
Whanau a Apanui said, “Petrobras has
no consent to be in these waters from Te
Whanau a Apanui. We’ve already told
them that. This is not a protest. This is an
act of defence of our ancestral lands and
waters that have sustained us for generations. Te Whanau a Apanui want Petrobras
to leave these waters and not return.”
According to the NZ Herald (April 12) a
NZ Air Force Orion has been patrolling
the surveying area and there is also a naval
ship in the area.
On April 24, police boarded the San Pietro
and arrested its skipper Elvis Teddy. An
additional charge (that of resisting arrest)
has also been added to the first charge
(that of operating a vessel in an unsafe
According to the Dominion Post: "Petrobras has earlier warned that action off
the East Cape could cause it to withdraw
earlier from its contractural obligations."
By Katherine Smith
Meanwhile, questions are being asked
whose interests are being served by the
deep sea oil exploration. Auckland activist
Penny Bright from the Water Pressure
Group discovered that Prime Minister
John Key holds shares in the Bank of
America which was one of the banks
which helped to manage $70 billion worth
of Petrobas shares sales last year.
According to The New York Times' Dealbook financial news service, the
banks involved in the massive
share deal earned 147.2 million
dollars in fees between them,
something which is considered
small potatoes in investment banking circles.
While most people who oppose deep
sea oil drilling don't want to risk another
"Deep Water Horizon" disaster off New
Zealand's coast with its attendant ecological and economic devastation, there are
also concerns that the seismic survey itself
may have harmful effects on local wildlife
such as whales and as well as adverse effects on the seafood industry.
Local people have also reported that there
have been dead penguins found washed up
in the area and Maori Party MP Te Ururoa
Flavell is calling for the penguins' deaths
to be investigated.
16 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
Petrobras has reportedly borrowed
a large amount of money to expand its operations, taking a loan
from the US Import Export Bank as well
as a large loan from China.
Interestingly, Bank of America Merill
Lynch is listed as one of the "Working
Capital Guarantee Delegated Authority
Lenders" for the US Import Bank. (See:
ebd-w-13.pdf )
To keep up to date with developments
on this issue:
See: http://www.stopdeepseaoil.
See also: http://uriohau.blogspot.
Herbal medicines
banned as EU directive
comes into force
By Daily Mail Reporter
April 30, 2011
was only open to those who could afford
the licensing process which costs between
£80,000 to £120,000.
At least 50 herbs, including horny goat
weed (so-called natural Viagra), hawthorn
berry, used for angina pain, and wild yam
will no longer be stocked in health food
Patients have lost access to hundreds
of herbal medicines today, after European regulations came into force.
Acupuncture falls outside the EU
directive and so remains unaffected.
Sales of all herbal remedies, except
for a small number of popular products for “mild” illness such as Echinacea for colds and St John's Wort
for depression have been banned.
Prince Charles, a long-standing supporter of complementary therapies,
has voiced his support for formal
regulation of herbal practitioners.
Until now the industry has been
covered by the 1968 Medicines
Act. This was drawn up when only
a small number of herbal remedies
were available.
For the first time traditional products
must be licensed or prescribed by a
registered herbal practitioner.
The government allowed access
to some unlicensed manufactured
herbal medicines via a statutory
Both herbal remedy practitioners and
manufacturers fear they could be forced out
of business as a result.
Some of the most commonly used products
were saved after the Health Secretary Andrew Lansley approved a plan for the Health
Professions Council to establish a register
of practitioners supplying unlicensed herbal
However, many remedies were lost as it
Royal Family Enforces
Media Embargo
Against Australia To
Prevent Nazi Jokes
By Paul Joseph Watson
April 29, 2011
Still think the British Royal Family has
no power and fulfils merely a ceremonial
purpose? Think again. In order to prevent an
Australian comedy show from making jokes
about Prince Philip being a Nazi during the
Royal Wedding, the Royals ordered broadcasters in Britain to enforce a media embargo that would have completely severed live
coverage to Australia’s biggest broadcaster if
they refused to cancel the satirical show.
After Prince Charles’ Clarence House found
out that Australian broadcaster ABC planned
to run a satirical commentary of the Royal
Wedding alongside the regular feed, Charles
issued more than a dozen alerts in the past
two years, including a warning last month
over a contaminated weight loss pill called
Herbal Flos Lonicerae (Herbal Xenicol) due
to concerns over possible side-effects.
Mr Lansley, in a written statement, said the
Government wanted to ensure continuing
access to unlicensed herbal medicines via a
statutory register for practitioners ‘to
meet individual patient needs’.
But recent studies show that at least
six million Britons have used a herbal medicine in the past two years.
shops, says the British Herbal Medicine
The 2004 EU directive demands that a
traditional herbal medicinal product must
be shown to have been in use for 30 years
in the EU – or at 15 years in the EU and 15
years elsewhere – for it to be licensed.
The UK drug safety watchdog, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency, has
Professor George Lewith, professor of
health research at Southampton University,
said: ‘Evidence for the efficacy of herbal
medicines is growing; they may offer cheap,
safe and effective approaches for many
common complaints.’
SOURCE: http://www.dailymail.
demanded ABC cancel the show, and then
ordered broadcast suppliers BBC, Associated Press, Sky and ITN to cut off the feed to
Australia, a command which they instantly
That’s right – the Royals have the power to
enforce media embargoes between Britain
and other major countries of the world. If
this doesn’t indicate how much influence
and power they still retain then nothing does.
The Royal Family threatened to deny Australia’s national broadcaster access to the
Royal Wedding after they announced plans
to run a satirical show called Chaser, which
would have featured comedians providing
light-hearted commentary over live pictures
of the marriage of Prince William and Kate
Read more at:
UNCENSORED June – September 2011 17
Shock Finding:
Princess Diana’s Post-Mortem
Samples Were Switched
An investigation of
official documents
that were withheld
from the 2007-8
Diana inquest jury
has revealed that
Princess Diana’s
post-mortem samples
were switched
prior to undergoing
toxicological testing.
A new book, published early May, shows
that the samples that were tested at the
Charing Cross Hospital on 1 September
1997 – although purported to be from
Princess Diana – were actually taken from
another body.
The book by Brisbane-based investigative
writer, John Morgan, is the definitive work
on what actually occurred in the 24 hours
following the deaths of Princess Diana
and Dodi Fayed in a Paris car crash on 31
August 1997.
In this latest volume of a series written
about the Diana inquest, entitled Diana
Inquest: The British Cover-Up, Morgan
reveals that the inquest judge, Lord Justice
Scott Baker, prevented the jury from
having access to the two most important
documents that assist in establishing cause of death – the PostMortem Report and the subsequent Toxicology Report on the
tested samples. The book shows
that when these documents are
studied – along with other important official documents that were
also withheld – they reveal that
Princess Diana’s samples were not
handed over to the toxicologist
based at Charing Cross Hospital.
Instead the toxicologist received
the samples of another female and
tested them in the belief that they
were from Princess Diana.
from the inquest jury. Further surprising
revelations in Diana Inquest: The British
Cover-Up, the fourth volume of the series,
• Princess Diana was subjected to two
post-mortems and two embalmings – both
in France and the UK – within the first 25
hours after her death
• The earliest post-death events – including Diana’s pre-post-mortem French embalming – were instigated and controlled
by the royals in Balmoral
• On 31 August 1997 the royal coroner
took illegal jurisdiction over Princess
Diana’s body
• Out of 23 documents connected to the
post-mortem of Princess Diana, the inquest jury got to see just 2, and they heard
evidence from only 3 of 14 key witnesses.
John Morgan says that “it is amazing that
the inquest jury – who were expected to
arrive at a verdict on the cause of death –
were prevented from having access to the
post-mortem reports for the two people,
Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed, whose
deaths they were investigating”.
He continues: “Scott Baker’s inquest jury
were required to draw conclusions without
being allowed to view some of the most
basic documentation and without hearing any evidence from some of the most
important witnesses.”
A leading UK QC, Michael Mansfield,
who served throughout the six months of
the London inquest, stated in 2010: “I
have read all of the books that John Morgan has produced.... I have no doubt that
the volumes written by [him] will come to
be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the
crash ... that resulted in the unlawful killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi
Al Fayed and the cover-up that followed.”
Diana Inquest: The British Cover-Up is
available at Amazon. Book details can be
viewed at:
All the books in the Diana Inquest series
can be viewed at:
Contact information:
Email: [email protected]
Morgan has spent over 5 years
investigating the evidence relating
to the 1997 crash in Paris’ Alma
Tunnel. The Diana Inquest series
of books is based on the testimony
heard during the inquest and also
evidence in official documents
from within the British police
investigation that were withheld
18 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
Medical Fascism in the US
April 16, 2011
Fascist Symbols in the US
The fasces is an ancient symbol of authority and power from Roman
times. Below is a picture of a Roman lictor carrying a fasces. The elm
whips could be removed from the bundle and used to punish, the ax could
be used to execute.
If you ever had any doubt that
the medical police state has
descended upon us, look no further than what just happened in
Detroit to an African-American
mother of a 13-year-old daughter:
Up until World War II the fasces symbol was widely applied in American
political iconography and appears twice on the Lincoln Memorial and
twice in the House of Representatives on the wall behind the rostrum.
For refusing to medicate her
daughter with dangerous psychiatric drugs, she was subjected to an attempting kidnapping
by CPS, then her front door was
broken down by armed police,
then a SWAT team beseiged
her house for 12 hours with
semiautomatic weapons, and
now she faces multiple felony
What was her crime? Not giving
her child psychiatric drugs!
The medical police state is
angry at parents who refuse to
drug their children.
More here:
UNCENSORED June – September 2011 19
Obama: Who is he
your license five seconds before the state
suspends you.
2. Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993.
3. So, we have the first black President
and First Lady – who don’t actually have
licenses to practice law. Facts.
This is from a former Chicago lawyer now
practicing law in Tyler, Texas.
This is legit. I checked it out myself at Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It’s the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very
strict and mean as hell. (Talk about irony.)
Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65,
maintain (at the cost of approximately
$600/year) my law license that I worked
so hard and long to earn. Big surprise.
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and
U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional
Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU)
Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama,
former editor of the Harvard Law Review,
is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered
his license back in 2008 in order to escape
charges he lied on his bar application.
A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something
where you decide, “Gee, a license is not
really something I need anymore, is it?”
and forget to renew your license. No, a
“Voluntary Surrender” is something you
do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender”
Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.
4. A senior
lecturer is one
thing, a fully
ranked law professor is another.
Barack Obama
was NOT a
Law Professor at
the University of
5. The University of Chicago
released a statement in March
2008 saying,
Sen. Barack
Obama (D-Ill.)
“served as a
professor” in
the law school.
However, that is
a title Obama,
who taught
courses there part-time, never held, a
spokesman for the school confirmed in
6. “He did not hold the title of Professor
of Law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky,
an Assistant Dean for Communications
and Lecturer in Law at the University of
Chicago School of Law.
7. The former Constitutional Senior
Lecturer (Obama)
cited the U.S. Constitution during his
State of the Union
Address. Unfortunately, the quote
he cited was from
the Declaration of
20 UNCENSORED June – September 2011
Independence... not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video:
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union
Address, President Obama said: “We find
unity in our incredible diversity, drawing
on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there, Champ, I mean Mr.
President. By the way, the promises are
not a notion, our founders named them
“unalienable rights”. The document is our
Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are created equal, that they
are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured
the Supreme Court moments later in the
same speech?
When you are a phony it’s hard to keep
facts straight. Still in doubt? Check it out
through the sources provided.