Document 17919

Portia Today No need for 'drag' Karen Blum
se Johannesburg Bar
of the Supreme Court was unable to
accept and register the same. Miss
W ookey applied to the Provincial
Division for an order to compel the
Law Society to accept and register
her articles of clerkship and obtained
an order from Maasdorp JP that she
was so entitled to enter into such
articles of clerkship and, upon attain­
ing the required qualifications, to be
enrolled as an attorney. From that
order the Law Society appealed and
it is of interest to note that all four
Law Societies clubbed together and
the costs of the appeal to the Appel­
late Division from this judgment were
subscribed to in equal proportions by
each. Such was the strength of
It is further of interest to note that
a similar application had served
before Bristowe J of the Transvaal
Supreme Court in the case of Schle­
sin v Law Society 1909 TS 363 where
the learned Judge stated:
In view of the long practice which has
prevailed not only in this country, but
in Holland and in England too, not to
admit women to be solicitors, I feel
that the proper course to be adopted,
if an innovation is to be made, is to
approach the Legislature and not the
The author, daughter of Adv I Godblatt QC, founder of the Bar in South West
Africa, was born and attended school in Windhoek, whereafter she obtained
a BA(Law) at the University of Cape Town and an LLB at the University
of London (University College). She practised first at the Windhoek Bar and
since 1976 at the Johannesburg Bar and took silk (the first woman to do so
in the Transvaal) in 1984. She acted on the Bench in SWAIN amibia in 1988
and in the Transvaal Provincial Division also in 1988. Karen is therefore well­
equipped to write on the position of women in the legal profession.
Historical background
On 26 March 1923 women became
persons. On that date the Vrouwen
Wetspraktizijnswet 7 of 1923 was
assented to, and it provided in s 1
that 'Women shall be entitled to be
admitted to practise and to be
enrolled as advocates, attorneys,
notaries public or conveyancers in
any Province of the Union, subject to
the same terms and conditions as
apply to men, and any law in force in
any province of the Union regulating
the admission or enrolment of per­
sons as advocates, attorneys, notaries
public or conveyancers shall hence­
forth be interpreted accordingly.'
It required the passage of an Act
of Parliament to afford recognition to
women to practise law since in the
celebrated case of Incorporated Law
Society v Wookey 1912 AD 623 Innes
ACJ, Solomon J and De Villiers JP
had held that the word 'persons' in
s 20 of the Cape Charter ofJustice,
regulating the admission of attorneys
in the Cape Province, included only
male persons and thus the respondent
Miss W ookey was not so qualified.
Miss W ookey had entered into
articles of clerkship with attorneys in
the Cape Province. The Secretary of
the Cape Incorporated Law Society,
however, refused to register the
articles and accordingly the Registrar
Miss Schlesin' s application was
accordingly refused.
Innes ACJ in Wookey's case, went
into the practice which prevailed
under the Roman Law and the
Roman Dutch legal system as it was
received into the Netherlands, and
the learned Judge concluded that
under the Roman Dutch system,
women could not be enrolled and
admitted as attorneys. When the
Roman Dutch system was introduced
into South Africa, this practice
remained unaltered during the whole
of the 18th Century. Following on the
British occupation there was promul­
gated the Charter ofJustice of 1827,
which was in turn superseded by the
Charter of 1934, s 20 of which fell to
be interpreted by the Court in
Wooktry's case.
The Court based its finding on a
similar decision held in the case of
Hall v Society oj Law Agents (38 Scot­
tish Law Reporter 776) where the
word 'persons' where it occured in an
Act dealing with the qualifications of
law agents, was held by the Full Scot­
tish Court to denote male persons
only. The term being ambiguous,
that meaning was assigned to it which
was shown to be in accordance with
inveterate usage. Innes ACJ con­
cluded that an intention to amend the
law of the new Colony and to
introduce at the Cape a rule which
was unknown in England would not
have been indicated by the mere use
of an ambiguous term, but would
have been expressed in clear and
definite language.
Solomon J and De Villiers J con­
curred with this finding .
Thus it was decided that women
were not 'persons' for the purposes
of the relevant legislation governing
the admission of attorneys in South
Africa, notwithstanding the clear
provision contained in s 7 of the
Union In terpretation Act 1910, that
in every law, unless the contrary
intention appears, words importing
the masculine gender shall include
This Act was not referred to at all in
argument or in the judgment,
although presumably the decision
could still have been justified by the
qualifying words 'unless the contrary
intention appears'.
Women in South Africa were not
alone in being relegated to this non­
status, since a similar position
prevailed in Scotland as can be seen
from Hall's case, and also in
England, where even after the pass­
ing of the Solicitors' Act 1843,
women were not permitted to qualify
and practise as solicitors.
In 1914, a young lady called Bebb
brought an application against the
Law Society which is reported in Bebb
v Law Society 1914 (1) Chancery 286,
for a declarator that she was a person
within the meaning of the Solicitors'
Act and that she was entitled to write
a preliminary examination which
would give her entry to apprentice­
ship. That Court, going into the
historical background in regard to
solicitors found that women had
never before been admitted as solici­
tors and that the Solicitors' Act,
where it referred to 'persons' also did
not intend such term to apply to
women, and made no provision
therefor. It was only in 1919 that this
disqualification was removed by way
of legislation, namely the Sex Dis­
qualification (Removal) Act of 1919.
South Africa was therefore not too
long in following this lead to make the
revolutionary change required to
admit women to the ranks of attor­
neys and advocates.
Prior to the passage of this legisla­
tion, however, there appeared in the
South African Law Journal at different
times, some interesting articles which
reflected the current thinking of
members of the legal profession. To
term these views 'chauvinistic' is
somewhat of an understatement, but
regard must be had to the position of
women in society at that time, and particularly in the professions.
These articles make for fascinating
reading and bear detailed quotation
to appreciate the strong feelings
which the prospect of women in the
ranks of the legal profession evoked
in potential male colleagues.
RPB Davis (later appointed to the
Bench), writing in the South African
LawJournal (1914) XXXI 383 refers
only in passing to Wookey's case, but
quotes in detail the substance of a
judgment in the State of Wisconsin,
in the Matter of Goodell, reported in
20 Am. Rep. 42. There the learned
American Judge R yan states as
It well becomes every court to be care­
ful of its Bar, and jealous of the rule
of admission to it, with the view of
fostering in it the highest order of
professional excellence. . . There are
employments in life not unfit for
female character. The profession of
law is surely not one of these. The
peculiar qualities of womanhood, its
gentle graces, its quick sensibility, its
tender susceptibility, its purity, its
delicacy, its emotional impulses, its
subordination of hard reason to sym­
pathetic feeling, are surely not qualifi­
cations for forensic strife. Nature has
tempered women as little for the
juridical conflicts of the courtroom, as
for the physical conflicts of the battle­
field. Womanhood is moulded for the
gentler and better things. And it is not
the saints of the world who chiefly give
employment to our profession. It has
essentially and habitually to do with all
that is selfish and malicious, knavish
and criminal, course and brutal,
repulsive and obscene in human life.
It would be revolting to all female
sense of the innocence and sancti ty of
their sex, shocking to man's reverence
for womanhood and faith in women,
on which hinge all the better affections
and humanities of life, that women
should be permitted to mix profession­
ally in all the nastiness of the world
which finds its way into courts of
justice; all the unclean issues, all the
collateral questions of sodomy, incest,
rape, seduction, fornication, adultery,
pregnancy, bastardy, legitimacy,
prostitution, lascivious cohabitation,
abortion, infanticide, obscene publi­
cations, libel and slander of sex, impo­
tence , divorce; all the nameless
catalogue of indecencies . . . Discus­
sions are habitually necessary in
courts of justice which are unfit for
female ears. The habitual presence of
women at these tend to relax the pub­
lic sense of decency and propriety. If,
as counsel threatened, these things are
to come, we will take no voluntary
part in bringing them about.!
In that case too, the Wisconsin court
held that in interpreting the relevant
legislation regulating the admission
oflegal practitioners, women did not
fall within the definition of 'persons'.
The author of this article concludes
by uttering a word of warning in
regard to any attempt which may be
made to persuade the legislature to
make an alteration in the law as
decided in Wookey'scase.
Profession's attitude
From another note appearing in the
South African Law Journal (1917)
XXXIV 342 it is clear that the
passage of the legislation in England
was not too enthusiastically received
by male members of the legal profes­
sion. A Bill to enable women to prac­
tise as solicitors was introduced in the
House of Lords, where the Bill was
carried at the third reading, but
bearing in mind the involvement of
England in the First World War, it
was not anticipated that the House of
Commons would provide the special
facilities for the discussion of the Bill
in those circumstances.
Prior to that both branches of the
legal profession in England had
recently spoken with no uncertain
voice as to the undesirability of so
drastic a change in the personnel of
the profession at a time when so
many barristers and solicitors were
serving at the front. At a general
meeting of the Bar, the proposal that
the General Council should consider
and report upon the desirability of
making provision for the admission
of duly qualified women, was rejected
by an overwhelming majority.
The author of this note goes on to
state that:
There is no doubt that on the merits
of the question there is a feeling
among the majority of the members of
both branches of the profession, in
England a well as in this country, that
an exception to the qualification of
women to enter the profession ... is
well founded. Though there is much
to be said for the view that women
should have a Parliamentary vote,
and even · Parliamentary represent­
ation, the instinctive objection to their
entering the public profession of the
law is a wholesome one .
Lower down the note continues:
In the present state of competition, it
does not seem right that an already
overcrowded profession should be
inundated by a deluge of women,
many of whom might find it difficult
to obtain a lucrative practice for abili­
ties which might be more profitably
employed in other directions.
The author then goes on to quote
an article in a recent edition of the
Nineteenth Century and After. The fol­
lowing excerpt makes for amusing
If there is one calling in the world for
which women are conspicuously unfit­
ted it is the law. Putting aside the
George Eliots and the Humphry
Wards, who are not five percent of
their sex, women have no idea of
relevance, or analogy, or evidence
. . . By the by, Portia is the only
woman who ever cut an effective
figure in a court of law, and Shake­
speare was notoriously partial to girls
in men's clothing and boys in pet­
ticoats. It must be admitted that the
young and learned doctor from Padua
had everything made easy for her.
For, although she appeared for the
defendant, there was no 'learned
friend' - which in the jargon of the
Bar means unlearned enemy - to say
her nay. The Duke too, the President
of the Court (probably under the
unconscious influence of sex), allowed
the advocate to climb onto the Bench
and not only to interpret the Statute
but pronounce judgment. Yet in her
hour of triumph Portia proved her real
incapacity for the cloth by refusing the
fee of three thousand ducats tendered
by a grateful client . . . "Robes and
furr'd gowns hide all" except the
female form divine, which is not
wanted in the Forum .
to approach the subject under discus­
sion from the standpoint which it is
generally approached, namely that it
is an injustice to women that they
should be excluded from the legal
profession. . . The question properly
to be dealt with ought not to be
whether an injustice is done to women
by excluding them from participating
in the pleasures and profits of the legal
profession, but whether it is in the
interests of the community at large
that they should be admi tted thereto.
The author then develops the idea
that difference of sex means differ­
ence of function and that women's
prime purpose is the perpetuation of
the race. When at a certain period of
In the following year 1918, Melius
de Villiers expressed himself as fol­
lows in the South African Law Journal
XXXV 289:
The conclusion at which I have
arrived after due consideration of all
the issues involved in the discussion of
this matter is that it is absolutely most
undesirable that women should be
life women cease to be capable of
exercising the functions of mother­
hood, the chief objection to their
becoming practising lawyers falls
away. But the author concludes,
'before that time, it seems to me it
would be a thing pernicious to the
good of society to admit women to
legal practice.' What woman would
have the temerity to persist in her
application for admission to practise
law if it was so clearly against the
interests of society?
North America
(That the dreaded deluge was not
forthcoming, in other countries as
well as in South Africa, is apparent
from an analysis of figures later in this
article. )
allowed to become practising mem­
bers of the legal profession; though
possibly there may be a certain very
useful limitation to this proposition.
It does not appear to me to be fitting
In North America, the State of
Ontario in Canada was more
progressive and as early as 1892 the
legislature passed an Act providing
for the admission of women to prac­
tise as solicitors.
In 1895 a further Act, amending
the original Act, was passed giving
the Law Society the additional power
of calling women to the Bar at its dis­
cretion and after a delay of two years
a certain Miss Martin was called to
the Bar in February 1897 and was
admitted as a solicitor on the same
The fear that there would be a
deluge of women in the legal profes­
sion was not borne out by the facts,
and in 1919 in Canada it appeared
that only seven women had been
admitted as solicitors, six of whom
were still practising. Their members
at that time amounted to one half per­
cent of the total number of practising
At that date, however, there were
in the United States about 1 200
women practising as lawyers, their
admission dating from 1869.
An article in the December 1918
volume of the Journal of Comparative
Legislation and International Law deal­
ing with the question of women in the
legal profession states as follows:
The great body of the profession is
beginning - has indeed progressed
some distance on the way - to treat
the woman lawyer as a desirable and
useful part of a profession and the
body politic. The courts have invari­
ably treated women practising before
them with the greatest courtesy and
kindness. On enquiry, I find that the
Bench can discover no difference in
the ability and acumen in man and
woman; it is the individual talent and
industry which tell, not the sex. While
there are exceptions, the rule is that
women do not take trial briefs; as in
Ontario, they mainly confine them­
selves to Chamber practice. The num­
ber of women lawyers is increasing
slowly if at all, and there seems to be
no more fear of man losing his lead in
law than in the sister profession of
medicine - indeed the competition is
not so great as in medicine.
Thus in the field of admission of
women as legal practitioners, so
jealously guarded by the male sex in
England, Scotland, South Africa and
Down Under, the N ew World led the
way by some decades.
Roman law
Aspiring women legal practitioners in
those countries such as South Africa
and Holland whose legal systems are
firmly rooted in the Roman law, have
for centuries borne the penalty for the
activities of one of their very early
predecessors. InJustinian's time the
Praetor's Edict had to be issued pro­
hibiting women from appearing as
advocates or attorneys for other per­
sons, the reason given being
Lest contrary to the proper modesty
of the female sex, they should mix
themselves up in the affairs of others,
and lest women should take upon
themselves the duties of men. (Digest
This Edict originated from the activi­
ties of a certain procurator of whom
V oet says the following:
Thus for example we find in many
females a praiseworthy modesty of
sex, while from the shameful manner
in which a certain Carfinia pleaded a
suit and annoyed the judges, we see
that other women might be given to
this vice of immodesty.
'Therefore', continues Voet, 'it is
rightly enjoined that a woman should
no longer appear as an advocate for
another person.' (Voet 1. 3.5).
Carfinia's conduct must have been
shameful indeed to have reverberated
through the centuries.
South Africa
In South Africa, there was no inun­
dation by women after the 1923 Act;
and it was not until 1926 that Con­
stance Mary Hall became the first
woman to be admitted as an attorney
in South Africa. This memorable
occasion was witnessed by three well­
known brothers in the legal profes­
sion; on the Bench was Judge BA
Tindall, counsel for the applicant was
Advocate RJL Tindall and Miss
Hall's principal, Mr WA Tindall.
In the same year that Constance
Mary Hall was admitted as an attor­
ney, Gladys Steyn became the first
woman to be admitted to the Bar.
Our male colleagues need have had
no fear that the passage of the 1923
legislation would open the floodgates
for women coming into the legal
profession. The rise in the number of
women practising as attorneys, at the
Bar, and on the academic staff of
universities has risen slowly indeed,
but steadily. In fact it is only in the
last few years that there has been a
marked increase in the number of
women appearing in all three arms of
the legal profession.
The following figures showing the
number of women actively involved
in the legal profession are of interest.
THE SITUATION TODAY Advocates Witwatersrand Local Division .......... 38 Transvaal Provincial Division .......... 7 Cape Provincial Division ................ 14 Durban & Coast Local Division ........ 4 Natal Provincial Division ................ 1 Northern Cape Division .................. 1 OFS Provincial Division ................. . South-Eastern Cape Local
Division .................................... . 65
There are several women enrolled
as pupils, but at present the 65 active
practitioners represent 6,4% of the
total number of practising advocates.
There is one practising silk in South
The Transvaal Law Society advised
that according to their records, no
distinction is made between attorneys
in relation to sex or race, and were
accordingly unable to supply the
information requested. However,
from an article by Barbara Lucatti in
the July 1989 edition of De Rebus, it
is noted that of the women in attor­
neys' offices in the Transvaal, 6% are
attorneys; and 8 % are articled clerks.
The other Law Societies advise as
follows in regard to practising women
Cape of Good Hope ..... 134
Orange Free State ....... 15 Natal ....................... 112 The same author gives the following
further statistics; of the total number
of practising attorneys, 450 (6%), are
women and of the articled clerks, 454
(22,5 %) are women, women con­
stituting 31 % of all new admissions
for 1988.
Academical statistics
Insofar as female students in univer­
sities and women on the academic
staff are concerned, the following
statistics have been obtained. The
figures include all law degrees and
diplomas offered at the respective
university and cover all the years
required for such degree or diploma.
Figures have also been provided,
where possible, showing the number
of female law graduates in 1988 and
134 483 55 110 271 159 228 381 26 352 2146 254 373 38
Cape Town ..................................
Durban-Westville ...........................
Fort Hare ....................................
Natal ..........................................
OFS ...........................................
Port Elizabeth ...............................
Potchefstroom .............................
Rand Afrikaans University ...............
Rhodes .......................................
Stellenbosch ................................
UNISA ........................................
Western Cape ..............................
Witwatersrand ..............................
No figures given
No figures given
No figures given
The above figures from 'Wits' can be further broken down as follows:
White ........................................ .
Coloured .................................... .
Indian ........................................ .
Chinese ...................................... .
Black ......................................... .
No replies were received from the University of Pretoria and The Uni­
versity of the North.
Insofar as legally qualified women employed on the staff of universities
is concerned, the following figures were supplied:
University of Cape Town.........
No figures given
University of Durban-Westville ..
2 (part-time junior lecturers)
Universify of Fort Hare............
2 lecturers
University of Natal.................
No figures given
University of Orange Free State.
7 (administration, research
and academic assistants)
University of Port Elizabeth ..... .
University of Potchefstroom ..... .
5 (lecturers)
3 (2 lecturers; 1 supervisor of
Rand Afrikaans University ...... .
Law Clinic)
University of Rhodes .............. . 1 (part-time lecturer)
University of Stellenbosch ........ . 2 senior lecturers
University of South Africa ....... . 62 (3 professors, 10 associate
professors; 23 senior lecturers;
15 lecturers; research staff)
University of Western Cape .... ..
2 (lecturers)
University of Witwatersrand ..... .
25 (academic staff).
Other capacities
Apart from the three recognised arms
of the profession, there are, of course,
those legally qualified women who
are employed in other capacities. The
following statistics were obtained
from the Manpower Survey No 17
Occupational Information 1987.
(Although these are not the most
recent statistics available the figures
for 1988 are apparently unreliable
since there seems to be an overall
reduction in all sectors.)
It is worthy of comment that in
1984 Adv N atalie Fleischack SC was
appointed Deputy Attorney-General
in Pietermaritzburg, a first, in what
was hitherto an entirely male
domain. This has not been repeated
elsewhere. Furthermore of the 16
magistrates in the Pretoria criminal
court, 9 are women (56%), and from
a modest figure of 1 female magis­
trate in the Pretoria civil courts, in the
early 1980s, there are today 14 in that
One can assume that there are
similar trends in other centres, but
unfortunately no other figures in this
regard have been obtainable to date.
It has not been possible to establish
the numbers of legally qualified
women who are employed in other
fields, such as legal advisers in min­
ing houses, industry and commerce
and by local authorities.
Insofar as the women in active
legal practice is concerned, it has
been noted that of the total number
of practising attorneys 6 % are
women, and the percentage is
approximately the same in regard to
the advocates. It may be of interest
to note some comparisons with other
In England, for example in 1955
there were women barristers com­
prising 4 % of the total. InJ uly 1989
there were 820 including Scotland,
which comprise 14% of the total.
37% of the barristers called to the Bar
in 1987 were women. Out of a total
of635 Queen's Counsel, only 25 are
women (Observer 3 July 1988).
Insofar as solicitors are concerned,
women account for just over 20 % of
all the solicitors on the Roll, but sig­
nificantly, for 45 % of all admissions
at present. (Editorial in the Solicitors)
Journal Volume 133 No 31, 4 August
1989. )
Moreover women made up no less
than 51 % of students passing the
final examination in 1987/88, the
most recent year for which figures
were available. (See the above
article. )
New Zealand
In New Zealand in 1988, Lowell
Goddard and Sian Elias were the first
two women to be appointed as QC's.
This was 92 years after the passing of
the Female Law Practitioner's Act
1896 which enabled Ethel Benjamin
to be the first woman to be admitted
to the profession as a barrister and
solicitor in 1897.
Insofar as university undergradu­
ates are concerned, in 1976 women
comprised 36 %, but by 1985 this
proportion had risen to 43 %. In 1976
the proportion of women doing doc­
torates was 17,8 % whereas by 1985
it was 30,9% (New Zealand LawJour­
nal21 January 1989). There is, as yet,
however, no woman appointed as a
High Court Judge.
South Africa can perhaps take
pride in the fact that although they
were somewhat tardy in allowing
women to be admitted to the Bar in
comparison to New Zealand, by 1968
South Africa had its first woman silk
and by 1969 Miss Justice Leonara
van den Heever had been appointed
Articled Clerk
5823 4621 712
1 781 1 258 327
Other legal occupations,
eg Legal Assistants
and Sheriffs
1 889 1 069 348
Sworn Appraiser
1 634 1 317
Women are also being employed in increasing numbers in the Depart­
ment of Justice, which furnished the following particulars:
Magistrates .... .. ....... . ................. . ... . ... . ....................... 86 State Prosecutors Magistrate's Court ........... .. .. ... ....... . ..... 296 State Prosecutors in Regional Court . .. . .. .. .. . ................... .. 52 State Attorney ' s Division................. . ...... . ... .. ... . ............ 10 Attorney-Generals' Division .................... . ..................... 20 Head Office ..... .... . . . .. ... . .. .. . . ......................... ... ... .. . .. . ..
Masters' Division.... . .. .. .. .. . .. ................................. . ... . .. 25 to the Supreme Court Bench , which
she has graced so ably for the last 20
years. However, it does not seem
likely that the number of women silks
or women judges is likely to increase
at all for a considerable number of
United States
It has not been possible to obtain any
figures from Australia or Canada.
Insofar as the United States is con­
cerned, however, a great deal of
attention is given to the subject of
women legal practitioners, many
articles are written, and many semi­
nars held in trying to improve the dis­
criminatory practices under which
women often have to work.
In 1984 there were more than
649 000 lawyers admitted to practise
in the United States. Of that number
about 13% were women. By 1986
there were approximately 103 000
women lawyers comprising 15 % of
all practising lawyers. At that time
40% of the Nation's Law School stu­
dents were women (ABA Journal
1 December 1986). Today women
represent 20 % of practising lawyers
and more than 40 % of students.
Although the statistics are impress­
ive as indicating a significant increase
in the number of women graduating
from universities, and entering the
professions, there is, however, a uni­
form recognition that women have to
battle against considerable odds to
achieve the same financial rewards or
professional recognition as men do.
'Glass ceiling'
Although originally applied to top
management in business, the phrase
is now commonly used in studies and
analyses of the progress of women
legal practitioners in law firms in the
United Kingdom, USA and even lat­
terly in South Africa. Much of the
problem in changing damaging
stereotypes of women hinges around
what is referred to as 'a glass ceiling'
for women. It exists in most organis­
ations and consist of a complex web
of management myths and values
which suggest that women are not fit­
ted for senior jobs . The 'glass ceiling'
was first identified in the United
States by Mrs Anne Morrison a
director of the Centre for Creative
Leadership, a management centre in
North Carolina. Her team made a
three year study of the progress of76
top female executives in the country's
biggest companies. The results were
compared with a similar study of
male executives. It revealed two bar­
riers that women encountered during
their progress up th e corpora te lad­
der . The first is at general manage­
m en t level and the second at senior
Th e ce ntr e dis covered that
women 's progress is slowed because
their companies forced them to per­
form to higher standards than men.
This is often because businesses
believe it is risky to promote women
to senior positions . The companies
also put greater pressures on women
to develop an acceptable image and
management style. Some 38 % of
women compared with 5 % of men
failed to get to the top because of a
poor image ; 50 % of women failed
because they were too ambitious
compared with 20 % of men and 25 %
of women were not ambitious enough
compared with 10 % of men.
Women's frustration
That the same views and pressures
apply to women in the legal field, can
be clearly seen from an article by the
Hon Rosalie Abella, a Provincial
Court Judge in Ontario, Canada,
published in the 26 October 1989 edi­
tion of Law Talk. Unfortunately
space does not permit any significant
analysis of the contents, which high­
lights the pain and frustration
suffered by women in their attempts
to be treated equally with their male
colleagues. Insofar as the attor­
ney/solicitor is concerned, the com­
plaints that one notes in research in
this country are exactly those which
obtained in England and in the
United States just to mention the
two. These are the reluctance to
appoint women as full equity part­
ners , the reluctance to recognise the
physiological demands of mother­
hood and the associated need for
proper maternity leave.
In the States, the percentage of
women partners has risen only 1 % a
year since 1982 (A BA Journal 1 June
1988). At that rate, only one in five
partners will be female by the year
2000. In South Africa it would be sur­
prising if the number was even as
high as that. It has been discovered
that in a number of larger firms in
Johannesburg , women have slowly
been appointed in latter years as full
equity partners, and are justifying
those appointments in the highest
degree. A survey to establish what the
actual percentage of women partners
there is in all the firms in South Africa
would be illuminating, but, I venture
to suggest, most discouraging. There
is also the question as to whether they
are full equity partners or merely
salaried partners, whose names
appear on the letterhead and which
makes it look as if women are in fact
being treated as equals.
Alternatives for women
In England women are seeking solu­
tions to the problems encountered in
different ways, such as working from
home, part-time working, job shar­
ing and career breaks.
These alternatives formed the sub­
ject of a recent conference at Liver­
pool University which had the aim of
considering changes in both law and
practice which would assist women at
present in the profession to stay and
encourage those who have left to
These options have also found
favour in the United States, but a
more intriguing innovation is finding
a place namely in temporary employ­
ment services for lawyers. Such ser­
vices exist in San Francisco, Los
Angeles, New York, Washington
DC, Chicago, Detroit and other
cities. The work done by such tem­
porary lawyers, ranges from filling in
at court for a motion call to the hand­
ling of complex litigation, tax or
bankruptcy work. This practice has
given rise to certain ethical aspects,
where, for example, a temporary law­
yer works for different law firms at
different times where there might be
a conflict of interest. Revolutionary
it certainly is. Can one envisage an
employment agency in South Africa
for part-time attorneys?
yers Division in America, among
3 000 lawyers of all ages, disclosed
the following interesting but
disturbing statistics:
D Women are far worse off finan­
cially than their male colleagues.
D Far more women report that their
chances of advancement are poor
(25% v 20% male) and that
advancement is not determined
by the quality of their work (21 %
v 16%).
D Far more women report a lack of
time for themselves (57 % v
D Compared to men, many more
women lawyers are divorced
(13 % v 4%) or single (22 % v
15 % ) and far more are childless
than their male colleagues (56 %
v 40%).
D The survey also found that
among lawyers who entered the
profession after 1968, fewer
women were employed in private
practice than men (54% v 76%)
and far more men were partners
than women (44% v 13%) (AEA
Journal 1 June 1988).
That women practitioners in law
firms in the United States, United
Kingdom and South Africa and no
doubt many other Western countries,
encounter difficulty in breaking
through this glass ceiling is
undoubted. But what of women bar­
risters/advocates in countries where
there is no fused system? The figures
there tell their own story. Women at
the Bar have made great strides in all
countries where a separate Bar
Success at the Bar
Interesting statistics
Television viewers might be tempted
to believe that women legal practi­
tioners live a glamorous and exciting
life constantly filled with challenge
and success. However, a survey con­
ducted in 1984 by the Young Law­
Recognition and success at the Bar of
course does not depend on senior
partners and recognition in a firm,
but is the result of individual appli­
cation and determination against
tremendous odds and often at great
personal and domestic cost.
In an article in The Observer (3 July
1988) the author, writing on the
recent appointment of Lady
Elizabeth Butler-Sloss as the first
woman to be appointed to the English
Court of Appeal, notes that specialist
expertise is an effective weapon
against discriminatory barriers in
employment - which is why some of
the most successful women at the Bar
today are those who have avoided the
scrum of general practice.
The same cannot be said of women
who are making their mark at the Bar
in South Africa. If they have suc­
ceeded, it is because they have been
in the thick of the scrum, playing the
game according to the rules dictated
by their male colleagues.
There is no doubt that in this coun­
try at least, women entering the Bar
were until recently looked upon as
dabbling in the profession to a large
extent. In order to prove oneself, one
had to be more assertive if not directly
aggressive, more dedicated and com­
pletely impervious to derogatory
remarks from colleagues and clients.
The parry and thrust of the court
room is a very severe testing ground
particularly if one is to enter the field
of commercial litigation. U nfor­
tunately the bulk of women at the Bar
are categorised as being fit to do only,
or mainly, matrimonial work, some
criminal work and perhaps motor
vehicle insurance matters. The num­
ber of women at the Bar who can be
counted as serious commercial coun­
sel with successful practices can be
counted on the fingers of one hand.
When one considers the personal
and other sacrifices demanded to suc­
ceed at the Bar, one is tempted to
rewrite the old Vaudeville song
'Don't let your daughter into Court
Mrs W orthington' .
I believe, however, that despite the
fears and strong views expressed by
RP Davis and others of his time,
women lawyers have proved them­
selves to be as able as their male coun­
terparts despite greater obstacles.
Women have had to succeed lest it be
said 'if women lawyers can't stand
the heat, let them get back into the
kitchen' (with apologies to President
(In any proposal of improvement, the proposer must sooner or later come down to a draft of words. And until he has tried to frame the words for his proposal, he can­
not be sure that he has himself grasped it, either in its extent or in its practicability. ' Henry John Wjgmore