HOW TO "AVOID" WORK. UNDERSTANDING THE WAYS IN WHICH PHYSICS USES MATHEMATICS WITH A NEW METHOD TO RECOGNIZE THE CONSTANT OF MOTION OF MECHANICAL ENERGY Marisa Michelini, Gian Luigi Michelutti, Department of Physics, University of Udine, Italy 1. Introduction Researchers and teachers often find themselves faced by the difficulties which students have with the mathematical instruments which physics uses both on the descriptive level and also on the interpretative level; almost as a logical, unquestionable consequence, they look for ways to avoid or reduce involvement on the formal level [1,2,3]. For example, they try to give greater weight to experimental activities (the educational role of which is beyond discussion for an experimental subject) [4,5,6], or they try to entrust to operativity and/or informal education the connection between the perception and observation of phenomenology and the physical description [7,8,9]. Didactic projects done in the 60s and 70s throughout the Western world  are examples of a translation of the various pedagogical theories into operational strategies for effective teaching. These projects mainly relied on experimental activity to construct a gradual awareness of the formal relationships between the significant variables in selected experiments (PSSC, IPS, PS2), even when the formulation was of a historic type (PPC). Such experiments were conducted over a wide scale, and established that it is not sufficient to optimize teaching in order to achieve good learning, and that other types of difficulties occur , such as those linked to the lack of connection between common-sense interpretation and physical interpretation [12,13], or those linked to the ability to use ways of representing things which physics uses, for example graphs . The difficulties in mechanics are particularly well-known [15-21]. If we examine them we notice that the difficulties are of a conceptual type, both with regard to the significance of the elements of formulas which physics introduces to describe and interpret, and also with regard to the styles of formalization which physics assumes. Studies on learning processes [22,23], and theories on conceptual change  have given useful indications for involving students, for the processes of building knowledge, for ways to encourage the contextualization of concepts, and for the ways in which to help students look at the world from a physical point of view. Research into the use of the computer in physics teaching has given an important contribution to the ability of looking at processes from a physical point of view, to reading and using graphs [25-29]. Such research has contributed decisively to putting into students' hands the process of constructing formalized physical models starting from qualitative hypotheses [30-34]. With regard on how to make students aware of the ways physics uses mathematics to deal with descriptive and interpretative problems in various circumstances: this problem is still open. It seems to us that this cannot be considered a secondary problem for a subject like ours, which has assumed, as a work style, a predictive capacity based on the description of phenomena by means of mathematical tools. It is a style which is a part of the epistemic roots of physics and we do not think it is possible to give this up, if we want to give young people the opportunity to develop a passion for this discipline . Therefore, we need contributions which show the ways physics uses mathematics, which familiarize students with these ways, and which give young people the opportunity to operate on this level without inhibitions, overcoming the prejudice that the symbolic language is impossible for them to manage. This work wants to give a contribution to this end, and offer a new way of recognizing mechanical energy as a constant of motion. 2. Definition of the proposal The point of view which directs this proposal favors the principles of energy conservation in the knowledge of physics and associates them with the existence of one or more constants of motion. In this conference we shall consider the conservation of mechanical energy, which allows to identify interesting characteristics of the motion of a material point, establishing a relationship between position and velocity. In the teaching of physics, the principle of conservation of mechanical energy is traditionally introduced by using the concept of work. In reality, in many basic physics problems, it is this very same concept which takes on significance and usefulness from the formulation of the principle of energy conservation. We therefore propose a didactic definition which sees the principle of energy conservation as the pivot of a mechanism which holds the concept of work as marginal and reserved only for dissipative forces. This approach develops from the second law of dynamics to a search for quantities which are constants of motion, that is, which re-write the law in terms of temporal derivatives of quantity, which express it in the direction of the motion. In order to do this, we consider the scalar products with the velocity v of both terms of Newton's second law. On the didactic level, in carrying out this first step, we point out to students that the scalar product of two vectorial sizes selects the contribution of one in the direction of the other. Moreover, we get the students used to exploring the significance of the temporal variation of one size with respect to its value: this usually helps us to know new properties, as happens in the description of phases in space. By representing the quantity of motion as a function of the position for a mass-spring oscillator, we see immediately if the motion of the system is dissipative or not. The expression of the kinetic energy emerges from the search for a quantity whose derivative gives the scalar product of the quantity of motion with the velocity. The expression of the potential energy is defined as that quantity whose temporal derivative gives the scalar product of the force with the velocity and it is recognized that this is possible only if the force has constant components in all directions. Since the two scalar products are equal, students recognize the conservation of mechanical energy both in classical dynamics and also in relativistic dynamics. The student finds himself face-to-face with a new way of looking at the characteristics of force. It must be subjected to verification and the general characteristics must be examined. From the expressions already found it is easy to obtain the known expressions of mechanical energy in the case of weight force, elastic force, gravitational force, Coulomb force and Lorenz force. The definition of conservative force emerges as the consequence of the fact that the scalar product of force times the velocity is equal to the temporal derivative of the potential energy. Work is obtained by examining the variation of mechanical energy when forces of friction are in play. This approach uses elementary mathematical tools, without losing the formal elegance and generality of the ordinary treatment based on infinitesimal calculus. It can therefore be given to first year students on no-calculus courses or as more detailed work for secondary school students specializing in science. 3. The formal itinerary proposed Newton's second law dp F= = p& , (1) dt compares the resulting force F acting on the material point with mass m and velocity v with the derivative of its quantity of motion p = m v. To recognize the contribution in the direction of motion, we consider the scalar products with the velocity v of the two members of the law. F ⋅ v = p& ⋅ v & ⋅v 3.1 The classic case of the scalar product p (2) It is known that the second member of (1) in the classic case of constant mass can be written as follows: dp d dv p& = = (mv) = m = ma (1.1) dt dt dt and hence the scalar product p& ⋅ v which is the second member of (2) can be written as dv y dv dv ma ⋅ v = m(v x x + v y + vz z ) . (3) dt dt dt Each term of (3) contains the component of the velocity vector in that direction and its temporal derivative, we shall therefore look at it as the temporal derivative of a single quantity. It is recognized that: vx dv x d 1 dv = v x2 + C x , v y y = d 1 v 2y + Cy , v z dvz = d 1 v 2z + Cz , dt dt 2 dt dt 2 dt dt 2 where Cx , Cy and Cz are arbitrary constants, from the second member of (3) we get vx dv dvx dv d 1 + vy y + v z z = v 2 + C , dt dt dt dt 2 Due to the principle of composition of motions we can put v 2x + v 2y + vz2 = v 2 and C = Cx + Cy + Cz . Thus we obtain d 1 dp ⋅ v = ma ⋅ v = mv 2 + C ' . dt 2 dt putting C'=0 so that the kinetic energy Ec (v ) = (3.1) 1 2 mv , is cancelled when velocity is nil, we obtain 2 dE dp ⋅v = c dt dt (4) & ⋅v 3.2 The relativistic case of the scalar product p In relativistic dynamics the expression of the quantity of motion vector is v2 p = mγ v = m1 − 2 c −1 2 v, (5) where m is constant and γ (v ) = (1 − v 2 c 2 ) −1 2 v2 dp = m1 − 2 c dt By definition, therefore, −3 2 . Deriving (5), therefore, we find v2 v dv v + m1 − 2 c 2 dt c −1 2 dv . dt (6) v2 F = m1 − 2 c −3 2 v2 vv& v + m1 − 2 c2 c −1 2 a. (7) 4. The law of force and mechanical energy in free motion We want to show that there are four basic cases where the law of force, acting on a free material point, allows us to find the constant of motion mechanical energy, using elementary rules of derivation If the force acting on the material point is constant and can be written as F = F0 = F0,x xˆ + F0, yyˆ + F0,z ˆz . (4.1) The scalar product of the force times the velocity gives F ⋅ v = F0, x dx dy dz d + F0, y + F0, z = (F0, x x + F0, y y + F0, z z + C ) (4.2) dt dt dt dt Thus we can introduce the function of the coordinates of potential energy − E p (x,y,z) = F0, x x + F0,y y + F0,z z + C , (4.3) where C usually represents an arbitrary constant By choosing C = 0 , so that Ep (0,0,0 ) = 0 we can write F⋅v = Remembering d (− E p ) . dt (4.4) F ⋅ v = p& ⋅ v . Replacing in (4), we find d d −E p )= (Ec ) , ( dt dt that is to say, d (E + E p ) = 0 . dt c (4.5) We can interpret (5) saying that mechanical energy Em = Ec + E p remains constant during the motion of the material point. We point out that the expression of kinetic energy is always given by (2.4) or by (2.9), whereas the expression of potential energy changes, case by case, and is deduced from the equation F ⋅ v = E& p . Replacing (4.3) in (3.1) we find, in classic dynamics, Em = 1 2 mv − F0, x x − F0, y y − F0,z z 2 (4.4) or, in relativistic dynamics, Em = mc 2 (γ − 1) − F0,x x − F0, y y − F0,z z . (4.5) Let us examine the case of weight force and take, to fix our ideas, F0 = −mgzˆ . (4.4) becomes Em = 1 2 mv + m gz 2 (4.6) that is 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 mvx + mvy + mvz + mgz = mv0, x + mv0, y + mv0,z + mgz0 . 2 2 2 2 2 2 (4.7) From (4.6), since the Cartesian components of acceleration a x e a y are nil, we deduce the relations between the components of the position vector and the velocity vector in the motion of free fall of bodies v x = v0, x , v y = v0,y , v 2z − v 20, z = g(z0 − z ). (4.8) 5. Elastic force Let us consider a material point subject to a force, which obeys Hooke’s law, F = -k x xˆ . (5.1) By calculating the scalar product of force times the velocity, we find F ⋅ v = -k x dx d 1 2 = - k x + C . dt dt 2 (5.2) By comparing (5.2) with (3.1), we can put Ep = 1 2 kx + C. 2 (5.3) If we take C = 0 , so that Ep (0 ) = 0 , we find Em = 1 2 1 2 mv + k x 2 2 (5.4) or, distinguishing the relativistic case from the classic case, 1 2 2 Em = mc (γ − 1) + k x . 2 6. Gravitational force and Coulomb force (5.5) On the level of macroscopic objects, motion is governed by two basic forces only, gravitational force and Coulomb or electromagnetic force. Mathematically, these two forces can be represented by the same formula, −3 2 2 2 F = k r r = k (x + y + z ) (xxˆ + yyˆ + zzˆ ). (6.1) If we put k = −G Mm , then (6.1) identifies the gravitational force which the material mass point M , located at the origin of the reference system, exerts on the material mass point m , located in the point identified by the position vector r . On the contrary, if we put k = Qq 4πε r ε 0 then (6.1) identifies the Coulomb force which the punctiform load Q exerts on the punctiform load q . If we calculate the scalar product of the force times the velocity, from (6.1) we directly obtain −3 2 ( F ⋅ v = k x2 + y2 + z2 ) (xv −3 2 x + yv y + zv z ) . (6.2) On the other hand, if we take u = r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 e u −1 2 = r −1 = (x 2 + y 2 + z2 ) d −1 2 1 −3 2 1 2 2 2 −3 2 u = − u = − (x + y + z ) , (6.3) 2 2 du −1 2 and d d 2 2 2 u = (x + y + z )= 2(xvx + yvy + zvz ). dt dt , we find (6.4) Consequently, by combining (6.3) and (6.4), we have d −1 2 d −1 2 d 2 2 2 −3 2 u = u u = − (x + y + z ) (xvx + yvy + zvz ). dt du dt (6.5) Therefore, by replacing (6.5) in (6.2), we can write F⋅v = − d d k ( k u −1 2 + C ) = − + C . dt dt r (6.6) By comparing (6.6) with (3.1), which provides the definition of potential energy, we can put k Ep = + C . (6.7) r If we choose C = 0 , so that the potential energy is annulled at an infinite distance from the origin, the formula for the constant of motion mechanical energy is Em = Ec + E p = 1 2 k mv + 2 r (6.8) in classical dynamics, while in relativistic dynamics it becomes k 2 Em = Ec + E p = mc (γ − 1) + . r (6.9) 7. Lorentz force Lorentz force acts on a punctiform electric load moving in a magnetic field FL = qv × B , (7.1) where q is the algebraic value of the movable load, v is the velocity of the load, B is the magnetic induction of the field where the load moves. The scalar product of the Lorentz force for the velocity is nil, FL ⋅ v = (q v × B ) ⋅ v = 0 , (7.2) because in the double mixed product the same velocity vector appears twice. In this case, therefore, the motion constant of mechanical energy coincides with the kinetic energy, Em = Ec . (7.3) 8. Conservative forces We underline the fact that the mechanical energy of a material point on which any force F acts, is a motion constant if F ⋅ v = − E& p . This consideration also suggests the way to define the concept of conservative force. 9. The exact differential F ⋅ dr = − dE p Let us take a free material point, immersed in a force field F = F (r) , which describes the trajectory identified by r = r(t ), with velocity v = rÝ. If the hypothesis F ⋅ v = − E& p (r ) is valid, we find F ⋅ vdt = − E& (r )dt , that is p F ⋅ dr = −dE p (r ) . (8.1) (8.1) expresses the variation in potential energy along an elementary segment of trajectory. If we take a finished arc of the trajectory, with ends rA ed rB , the variation in the potential energy is given by ∫ rB rA F ⋅ dr = − ∫ dE p = E p (r A ) − E p (rB ) . rB (8.2) rA If we consider all the possible trajectories, with ends rA and rB , then (8.2) states that the integral ∫ rB rA F ⋅ dr , although calculated along different integration paths, always assumes the same value expressed by − ∆E p . Therefore (8.2) suggests the well known definition of conservative force; if it is an exact differential, the force F is conservative, that is, ∫ rB rA F ⋅ dr == E p (r A ) − E p (rB ) , whatever may be the path which has rA ed rB as its ends. 10. Constrained motion, friction forces and the concept of work Let us consider the material point on which not only active forces but also constraining reactions act. We shall indicate these constraining reactions with the symbol Φ . The law governing these forces is not generally known in advance, that is, before finding the law of motion. However, if the constraining reactions are normal at the trajectory of the material point, that is, normal to the velocity vector, the mechanical energy is always a motion constant. But if there are constraining reactions acting on the material point which possess an anti-parallel component to the velocity vector, the mechanical energy is not preserved. In may cases which occur in practice the antiparallel component is due to the friction or resistant forces. If we calculate the quantity of mechanical energy dissipated due to the friction forces, this leads to the natural definition of work done by a force. 11. Constraining reactions normal to the velocity vector Let us assume that the resultant force acts on the material point R = F + Φ, (9.1) where F represents the active force, while Φ represents the constraining reaction. If Φ⋅v = 0, (9.2) the mechanical energy is always a motion constant. In fact, we can write (F + Φ ) ⋅ v = F ⋅ v = dp ⋅ v . (9.3) dt Consequently, if F ⋅ v = − E& p , we can conclude that the principle of conservation of mechanical energy Em = Ec + E p remains valid. We observe that Φ can represent the tension of the unstretchable wire, T , in the motion of the mathematical pendulum, or the normal constraining reaction of the supporting plane, N , in the case of motion along an inclined plane without friction. 12. Friction forces Let us now suppose that on the material point a resultant force is acting, given by R = F + Φ + Fr , (10.1) where F represents the active force, Φ the constraining reaction perpendicular to the velocity vector and Fr = Fr (− vˆ ) a friction force, anti-parallel to the velocity vector. In the case of dynamic grazing friction, for example, we have Fr = µ d N (− vˆ ) , in the case of viscous friction Fr = bv (− vˆ ). Remembering that R = p& , from (10.1) we find dp ⋅ v − F ⋅ v = Fr ⋅ v , dt (10.2) that is, thanks to (2.5) and to (3.1), d E m = Fr ⋅ v . dt (10.3) Therefore the mechanical energy is not preserved, in fact the product Fr ⋅ v = − Fr v expresses the rapidity with which it is dissipated. The variation of energy in a time interval [tA , tB ] is defined by means of the integral of the first and the second member (10.3), that is, tB ∆E m = ∫ Fr ⋅ vdt . (10.4) tA Since v dt = dr , from (10.3) we obtain dE m = Fr ⋅ dr and we can re-write (10.4) in the form rB ∆E m = ∫ Fr ⋅ dr , rA (10.5) where rA and rB are the ends of the trajectory arc described by the material point in the time interval [tA , tB ]. We should point out that, in general, (10.4) or (10.5) do not allow us to calculate ∆Em and therefore of the integral which appears as the second member, if the dependency of the velocity on the time v = v(t ) is not explicitly known. Therefore, for the actual calculation of the dissipated energy, we must first solve the differential equation dp ˆ ˆ + F ⋅T ˆ, ⋅T = F⋅T (10.6) r dt ˆ, obtained from (10.1) by multiplying in scalar fashion the first and second member by the versor T ˆ = 0. tangent in every point of the trajectory, replacing R = pÝ and remembering that Φ ⋅ T 13. Work Traditionally, the integral ∫ rB rA Fr ⋅ dr is called work done by the resistant force Fr and is indicated by the symbol rB L = ∫ Fr ⋅ dr . rA (11.1) The physical meaning of (11.1) is supplied by (10.4) or by (10.6). We would add that this definition of work also clarifies the etymological meaning of the term , which in Italian derives from the Latin labor and, apart from work, action, enterprise can also denote labor, toil, worry. 14. Conclusions The teaching of physics to young people must include activities suitable to develop awareness of the role of mathematics in physics and the ways in which it is used in different circumstances. In physics, it is the integration of the two planes, phenomenal and formal, which creates the meanings; it builds those concepts which allow us to describe and interpret the world, using models able to explain classes of phenomena through theory. The well-known limits in managing mathematics are mainly of a conceptual character and due to the fact that students are not used to looking for the significance of the calculus which they have learnt to do. Attention must therefore be paid to this problem and time must be spent on didactic research in order to construct proposals able to encourage the acquisition of a thorough knowledge of quantitative features of physics. Starting from the following considerations: - The principles of conservation are part of the deepest roots of physics and, in particular, are decisive in the development of mechanics. - Every principle of conservation entails the existence of one or more constants of motion. - Among these, mechanical energy is particularly important, which allows us to identify interesting characteristics of motion of a material point, establishing a relationship between position and velocity. We have developed a proposal which leads to identify mechanical energy and its conservation starting from Newton's second law, without the prior introduction of the concept of work. Its coherence and completeness are recognized by the possibility of obtaining the expressions of mechanical energy in the same way when the forces in play are of various types: from gravitational forces to Coulomb forces, from weight to elastic force, from Lorenz force to restraining reactions. The definition of conservative force can be recognized in terms of a corollary with respect to the prior introduction of a potential energy. The case of forces of friction introduces the nonconservation of mechanical energy and the concept of work. The itinerary proposed, which does not require mathematical knowledge and/or ability above those which every student learns in a secondary school specializing in scientific subjects, allows the student to familiarize himself with some important ways of looking at physics through mathematics, such as using the scalar product, vectorial de-composition and the properties of temporal derivatives with respect thereto, the search for primitive functions, the identification of quantities which are conserved. If we do not choose it as an alternative to the traditional way of introducing mechanical energy and its conservation, it represents a powerful opportunity for reflecting on concepts which connect the way of looking at the world through forces with the way of looking at the world through energy. References  J. Piaget, R. Garcia, Les explications causales, Etudes d'épistèmologie génètique, vol. XXVI, P.U.F. (1972).  E. Guesne, A. Tiberghien & G. Delacote, Methodes et resultats concernant 1'analyse des conceptions des hleves dans differents domaines de la physique, Rev. Fran. Pbda., 45, (1978), 25-32.  S. Strauss & R. Stavy, U-Shaped behavorial growth: Implications for theories of development, in «Review of child development research», W.W. Hartup Ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1985).  P. Black, B. E. Woolnough, The role of the Laboratory in Physics Education, Girep International Conference, Oxford, University Press, (1986).  La Fisica nella Scuola, Special issue on strategies of physics teaching: the role of the problem and the role of the laboratory , in Italian, (Speciale sulle strategie di insegnamento della fisica : il ruolo del problema e il ruolo del laboratorio), XXVII, 4, (1994).  M. Michelini, Quale laboratorio per la formazione degli insegnanti: un contributo sul problema del laboratorio nella didattica della fisica, Quaderni MPI, Roma, (1998).  Physics Education special issue on hands-on science, vol.25, N.5, (1990).  S. Chaikin, J. Lave, eds., Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context, Cambridge, University Press, (1993).  S. Bosio, V. Capocchiani, M. C. Mazzadi, M. Michelini, S. Pugliese, C. Sartori, M. L. Scillia, A. Stefanel, Playing, experimenting, thinking: exploring informal learning within an exhibit of simple experiments, in Proceedings of GIREP-ICPE International Conference – Ljubljana, (1996).  Some of the well known projects translate in different language are the following: PSSC - Physical Science Study Curriculum, developed in MIT, USA; PPC : Project Physcs Course, developed in Harvard University, USA; Nuffield developed by Nuffield Foundation, UK; IPS & PS2 developed in MIT, USA for introduction of science in 14-16 age; Spoerg Nature developed in Denmark; IPN Curriculum science, developed in Kiel, Germany  J. Novak, D. Gowin, Learning how to learn, Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, UK, (1978).  H. Pfundt & R. Duit Students' alternative Frameworks and Sci Educ Inst for Sci Educ (1995)-Kiel (D).  M. Vicentini M. Mayer, Didattica della fisica, La Nuova Italia, Roma, (1996).  L.C. McDermott, M.L Rosenquist and E.H Van Zee, Students difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics, Am. J. Phys., 55, (1987), 503.  Articolo sullo speciale delle rappresentazioni mentali.  L. Viennot, "Le raisonnement spontané en dinamique élémentaire", Hermann, Paris, (1979).  E. Saltiel, J.L. Malgrange, "Les raisonnements naturels en cinématique élémentaire", BUP, 616, (1979), 1326.  D.E. Trouwbridge and L.C. McDermott, Investigation of students understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension, Am. J. Phys., 48, (1980), 1020.  D.E. Trouwbridge and L.C. McDermott, Investigation of students understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension, Am. J. Phys., 49, (1981), 242.  L. Viennot, L. "Bilan des forces et loi des actions réciproques. Analyse des difficultés des élèves et les enjeux didactiques", BUP, 716, (1989), 951.  M. Gagliardi, G. Gallina, P. Guidoni, S. Piscitelli, "Forze, deformazioni, movimento" Emme Edizioni, Torino, (1989).  K. Bednar, D. Cunningam, T. M. Duffy, J. D. Perry, Teory into practice: How do we link? in Instructional technology. Past, present and future, J. C. Angelin ed., Englewood, Colorado, Libraries Unlimited, (1991).  M. D. Merrill, Constructivism and the technology of instruction, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum (1992).  G.L. Posner, K.A. Strike, P.W. Hewson and W.A. Gertzog, Accomodation of scientific conceptions: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci. Educ., 66, (1982), 211.  R.K. Thornton, Tools for scientific thinking - microcomputer based laboratories for physics teaching, Phys. Educ. 22, (1987), 230.  K. Swan, M. Miltrani, The changing nature of teaching and learning in computer-based classrooms, Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 25, (1993), 121-127.  M. Riel, Educational Change in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 26, (1994), 31-43.  L.T. Rogers, "The computer-assisted laboratory", Phys. Educ. 22, (1987), 219.  R.F. Tinker, "Computer-aided student investigations", Computers in Physics, Jan/Feb (1988), 46.  R. K. Thornton, Changing the physics teaching lab:Using tech and new approach to learning physics concepts, AJP, 58, (1990), 858.  M. Michelini, L'elaboratore nel laboratorio didattico di fisica: nuove opportunita' per l'apprendimento, Giornale di Fisica, XXXIII, 4, (1992), 269.  S. Hennessy, D. Twigger, R Driver, T. O’Shea, C. E. O’Malley, M. Byard, S. Draper, R. Hartley, R. Mohamed, E. Scanlon, A classroom intervention using a computer-argumented curriculum for mechanics, International Journal of Science Education, 17 (2), (1995), 189.  M. L. Aiello Nicosia et al., Teaching mechanical oscillations using an integrate curriculum, International Journal in research on Science Education, 19, 8, (1997), 981-995.  M.Wells, D. Hestenes A modelling method for high school phys instruction, AJP, 63, (1995), 606.  M Michelini, R Millar et al., Texts of the intervention to the round table "The contribution of nstitutions to the improvement of physics teaching", International Girep Conference Book, Barcellona, (2000).
© Copyright 2019