How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA How To Do A Latarjet Procedure Matthew T. Provencher, MD CDR MC USN Chief, Sports Surgery Massachusetts General Hospital Associate Professor of Surgery, Harvard University [email protected] Rachel M. Frank, BS Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL USA | [email protected] Introduction à Potential Pitfalls in Any Shoulder Instability Repair1 • • • • • • • • • Glenoid bone loss à lots of attention in recent literature o Over 40 peer-review publications in major journals since 2009 alone (pubmed) Significant Hill-Sachs lesion Revision situation – post thermal cases Revision situation with prior capsular insufficiency Prior anchor (mal) placement Error in diagnosis Rehabilitation issues and compliance Technical errors o Correct anchor placement o Proper capsular mobilization (HAGL) o RI Closure? o Prior thermal cases? o Adequate capsular tensioning – 1cm? Associated injuries o SLAP, HAGL, bony deficiencies o Neurologic injury (winging!) • Boileau (JBJS 2006)2 – “Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair” o 91 patients followed prospectively o 15.3% recurrence (36 months f/u), at 17 months post-surgery o Recurrence higher in hyperlaxity, bone loss, and number of anchors - 4 or more was good prognostic sign • Tauber3 – “Reasons for failure after surgical repair of anterior shoulder instability” o 41 patients followed 49 months How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA o At revision surgery – 56% with persistent bony defect, 22% with patulous capsule, 5% with laterally torn capsule Glenoid Bone Loss à Prevalence, Etiology, Classification, and History • • • • • • Burkhart and DeBeer (Arthroscopy 2000)4 o 21 of 194 patients with “significant” glenoid bone loss o Defined “Inverted Pear” glenoid o 61 % failure in patients with inverted pear glenoid treated arthroscopically 100 CT scans of shoulder instability patients (Sugaya JBJS 2003)5 o 50% osseous Bankart lesion (1 large -27%, 27 med– 11%, 22 small – 3%) Location of glenoid defect – mean at 4:17 o’clock (antero-inferior) (Saito AJSM 2005)6 o Parallel to long axis of glenoid o At higher % defects, the line of bone loss changes somewhat to slightly more oblique Griffith – AJR 20087 o More bone loss in recurrent instability o 145 patients with CT scan: § 0-10% bone loss – 51% § 10-20% bone loss – 37% § 20-25% bone loss – 6% § >25% bone loss – 6% Glenoid bone loss higher rate of failure after stabilization procedures (Bigliani AJSM 1998)8 o Amount and type of bone loss quantified and classified into 3 types o 25 patients with glenoid rim lesions were classified o 22 / 24 shoulder with good stability at 30 months (88%) o Type I (16 pts); Type II (5 pts); Type IIIA (3 pts); Type IIIB (1 pt) o Recommendations from their clinical experience: Type I Avulsion fracture Bone/capsule repair Type II Medial fragment Capsular Repair Type IIIA <25% bone loss Capsular repair Type IIIB >25% bone loss Coracoid transfer Burkhart and DeBeer, Arthroscopy 20004 o 194 athletes (101 rugby players) with arthroscopic Bankart Repair o 3 metallic suture anchors on average o 10.8% recurrence rate (21 total; 14 redislocations, 7 subluxations) o 173 without bony defects à 4% recurrence o 21 with bony defects à 67% recurrence § Contact athletes with bone defect à 89% recurrence o Significant bone defect = “Inverted pear glenoid” (not precisely measured, but as viewed from the anterosuperior portal the inferior diameter of the glenoid was smaller than the superior diameter”)9 How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA o Conclusion: Patients with significant bone defects, especially contact athletes are not candidates for arthroscopic repair § Approximately 11% had significant glenoid bone defects • Patient History – low threshold for glenoid bone loss suspicion especially if (Piasecki, Provencher, Romeo et al; JAAOS 2009): o Long-term instability o Multiple dislocations o Mechanical clunk o Multiple reductions/ER reductions. o Progressive ease of dislocation and also reduction o History of self reduction (Not MDI) o Instability symptoms in mid-ranges of motion Glenoid Bone Loss - Biomechanics • • • • Biomechanics: Itoi (JBJS 2000)10 – glenoid defects anteroinferiorly of >21% (mean 6.8 mm) causes persistent instability and limit ER after Bankart repair. However, he demonstrated stability in ABER position due to competent capsular constraints. ABD&IR allowed to subluxate. CONCLUSION: Glenoid Defects >21% (approx 6.8 mm) may cause continued instability and limit ER after Bankart Repair (especially with capsular repair) Clinical Applicability: What is also inferred from Itoi’s work is that in up to a 21% bone defect, the capsular restraints will potentially be enough for stability when adequately repaired Biomechanical Implications of Glenoid Bone Loss ↓ glenohumeral stability ↓ articular arc length = ↓ balance stability angle ↓ articular arc depth = ↓ concavity-compression stability ↑ glenohumeral contact pressures ↑ surgical failure rates (if not addressed appropriately) ↑ shear forces seen by isolated soft-tissue repairs = ↑ failure rates Quantifying Glenoid Bone Loss • Radiographic: How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 • • • Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA o Axillary view and also true AP of the glenohumeral joint may offer “hint” of subtle bone loss o Easier to see large losses. Body habitus, radiographic quality (axillary esp.), and other factors may inhibit determination of amount of glenoid bone loss by plain radiography o Special axillary views that are helpful: § Apical oblique – Garth JBJS 198411 § West Point View – Roukis and Feagin CORR 197212 o Itoi AJSM 200313: cadaveric glenoids utilized to create glenoid bone defects, and West Point and CT scan compared. § 21% defect was 18.6% on the West Point § 21% defect was 50% of width on single slice (axial) Saito, Sugaya et al AJSM 20056 o 123 CT scans – patients with anterior shoulder instability o Defined location of the defect (approximately 3 o’clock centered, extending inferiorly) Sugaya et al. JBJS 20035 o 100 instability shoulder with CT scan studied o Defect measured based on CT scan and digitized the inferior 2/3rds of the glenoid § The inferior 2/3rds of glenoid is consistently a “circle”14, 15 § (Provencher personal images) Gold Standard to assess bone loss is by 3D CT scan, with humeral head digitally subtracted o Loss of circle bone comprises amount (percent) of bone loss How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA From Piasecki, Romeo, Provencher et al. JAAOS 2009. • • Bone Loss and size of Fragment (#1 in the right panel) indicates a certain percentage of loss, in a percent = area Fragment #1 divided by area of circle #1. (From JBJS, 2003)5 MRI or MRA may be helpful: 16 (Provencher images) • Conclusions – Radiographic Measurements: o CT scan remains the gold standard for determination of bone loss o Large Majority of instability patients have some form of bone loss (erosion or “attritional” versus bony fragment) • Arthroscopic Measurements • Lo, Parten & Burkhart, “The inverted pear glenoid: An indicator of significant glenoid bone loss” Arthroscopy 20049 o Cadaveric study and clinical study (53 patients) to evaluate amount of glenoid bone loss arthroscopically o termed “inverted pear glenoid” when viewed from anterosuperior portal. o Correlated with cadaveric measurements o Based upon measurements from the glenoid bare spot17 How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA Glenoid Bone Loss – Treatment Options • • Based upon preoperative or intraoperative determination of bone loss Key: How to obtain a successful stabilization procedure with minimal losses of motion • Nonoperative o Smaller fragments o Lower demand individuals: • Maquieira (JBJS-Br 2007) found no redislocations in 14 patients with >5 mm bone fracture treated nonoperatively • Arthroscopic Repair o Glenoid bone loss less than 20 to 25% o Can be successful o Provencher et al (2007)16– results better with incorporation of bony fragment o Sugaya et al (2006)20, 21 – bony lesion, if repaired with arthroscopic techniques can heal to more normal/near anatomic position § Reconstitutes the bone loss of glenoid § Better if more acute injury § Less predictable if attritional/erosion loss • Open Repair without Bony Augmentation o Described for open capsulolabral repair to address bone loss § Probably similar to arthroscopic repairs, potentially higher success? § 0/14 recurrences in open repair procedure22 o Open repairs – screw fixation of acute fractures23 • Bone Augmentation Procedures o Glenoid bone loss of potentially any amount o Especially in loss >20-25% o Variety of options and techniques o Arthroscopic bone grafts o Arthroscopic coracoid transfer • THE LATARJET TECHNIQUE o – Many ways in which to do a Latarjet Procedure § >20 different variations of the original description from 1954 § All involve – on some level- transfer of the coracoid to the anterior glenoid § Coracoid transfer § Bristow – “tip” of coracoids § Latarjet – larger piece of coracoids How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 - Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA Why does a Latarjet work? o 1. Bone block augmentation of the glenoid § reconstitution of glenoid bone stock o 2. “Sling” effect of the conjoint tendon through a subscapularis split § Abduction and ER – sling tightens providing improved anterior stability o 3. Anterior capsule repair to bone block, anchors, or CA ligament § Capsule repair = anterior restraint o o Technical Issue #1: How much bone to take - - Latarjet typically is about 20-25 mm of bone of anterior tip coracoid to posterior o Sufficient for two screws Bristow is smaller amount, about 10-15 mm o Sufficient for one screw Measure from anterior tip of coracoid posterior with ruler Cut with either 90 degree angled sagittal saw or ¼ to ½ inch osteotome. Protect inferior structures Dissect off pectoralis minor off medial edge of coracoid CA Ligament o – If you want to repair capsule to the CA ligament, keep CA ligament long and cut 1cm in length laterally off the coracoid o – Recommend preserving the CA ligament length on the bone in order to sew in capsule at end of case if desired Bone for Latarjet should be just long enough to get to the elbow of the coracoid and have small splinter into the curve of the coracoid Technical Issue #2: How to manage the subscapularis (SSc) - Traditionally done with a SSc split o – The SSc split allows for the conjoint tendon to drape over the SScà allows for anterior stability improvement via “sling” effect Split in the SSc is generally halfway as measured from top of rolled edge of SSc to the bottom (near vessels) Can make split slightly more superior in patient with anterior instability and hyperlaxity to help address the inferior laxity Pitfall: Avoid LHB (laterally) at the groove Pitfall: Avoid going medial to the level of the coracoid (nerve to SSc penetrates anteriorly to the SSc muscle about 1 cm medial to the coracoid) Goal: SSc preservation of insertion site on LT Alternative: If difficult to see GH joint, one may take down the superior part of the SSc, but perform meticulous repair, augmented with suture anchors. How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA Technical Issue #3: Rationale and Technique on How to Orient the Bone Block - Orientation of the coracoid – two ways to orient coracoid 1. Lateral edge (traditional) of coracoid is the glenoid face a. Preserves CA ligament for repair of anterior capsule b. Allows for ease of bone fixation c. Pitfall - Surface is “rougher” than with inferior edge, however, may not be issue d. Provides about 7-8 mm of bone stock for glenoid face 2. Inferior edge (Burkhart/DeBeer) of coracoid is glenoid face a. Inferior edge as glenoid face by rotating 90 degrees b. Allows for improved conformity of the glenoid (surface is concave like the glenoid) c. Allows for more bone stock and bone length (10-13 mm of bone stock for glenoid face) d. Pitfall – more difficult to fix with screws (narrower margine for error and trajectory) e. Pitfall- may serve as larger lever arm and bend/fracture Technical Issue #4: How to Manage the Anterior Glenohumeral Capsule - Many ways to manage the capsule – provides greatest variation in the case 1. No capsule management a. Do SSc split and then also cut directly through capsule b. Bone block is affixed after capsule is taken down off glenoid neck c. Capsule not repaired at end 2. Capsule dissected medially off glenoid neck a. L-based incision – start superior in rotator interval and take medial and horizontal to the glenoid neck How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA b. Dissect off as much capsule anteriorly as possible preserving length of capsule c. Dissect off medially from glenoid neck and tag with #2 suture. Can repair with variety of techniques 3. Capsule off humerus a. May take off humerus and repair back, however, still need to dissect capsule off glenoid for bone to bone contact Technical Issue #5: Bony Fixation Techniques - Fixation accomplished with screws Other methods have been described (cortical suture buttons, PEEK or bioabsorbable screws) “Gold” standard is two 3.5 mm AO screws, non-cannulated with small washer Overdrill the anterior aspect of coracoid to obtain compression fixation (lag technique) May use 4.0mm cancellous screws (again overdrill with lag technique) if need better fixation bite Cannulated systems are described Pitfall: cannulated screws <3.5mm may be prone to failure and bending Generally two screws to fix bone graft Pitfall: Length of screws is between 32-38 mm. Longer screws indicate either too long in the back or trajectory (angle relative to face of glenoid) is too divergent Goal: to have screw trajectory be within 10-15 degrees of the face of the glenoid Technical Issue #6: Capsule Closure Management - If choose to repair capsule – multiple ways 1. Repair to native CA ligament that comes off the coracoid (traditional Latarjer) a. Utilized #2 suture to repair capsule to CA ligament. b. Ensure there is good ER at side and equal to opposite side when tensioned c. Two to 3 figure of 8 sutures are sufficient 2. Repair capsule to anterior construct a. Repair to sutures placed under washers b. Sutures tensioned and capsule tied to anterior aspect of bone (this is way to do fixation for ICBG and allograft – i.e. distal tibia) 3. Suture anchors to native glenoid a. Suture anchors (usually two) are placed after bone graft affixed in native glenoid b. Sutures are utilized to tie down the capsule c. Pitfall: the capsule may be “posteriorized” by this procedure – meaning the capsule is moved posteriorly esp with a case in which there is bone loss of the glenoid i. May result in significant losses of ER How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA Glenoid Bone Loss – Selected Results • Previously discussed Burkhart and De Beer (Arthroscopy 2000) o Very high recurrence (67%) with “inverted pear glenoid” • Sugaya et al. (JBJS 2005)20 – “Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability” o 42 patients followed 34 months with mean loss of 24.8% anterior glenoid. § All had osseous fragment that was incorporated into the Bankart Repair (anchors) § 39/42 G/E result at final f/u – 2 with reinjury • Provencher, Mologne et al AJSM 200716 o 23 patients (mean age 25 years, San Diego military population) o 93% follow-up at mean of 37 months o Mean of 25% anterior glenoid bone loss o All treated with arthroscopic repair (3 to 4 bioabsorbable anchors) o 11 patients had “Attritional loss” (no bony Bankart); 10 patients had Bony Bankart o 3 Failures à all in the “attritional” group (2 sublux, 1 dislocated) § Mean loss ABER = 8 degrees • Porcellini et al AJSM 200728 o 215 arthroscopic repairs over 6 years o 31.5% had bony Bankart; operated on early versus late o Review of results showed chronic (61 Rowe score) had less favorable outcomes than acute (92 Rowe score) • Rhee et al Int Orthop 200729 o Open Bankart repair those with glenoid bone loss (20 pts) and those without (20 pts) o Less favorable scores with larger glenoid bone loss • Burkhart et al Arthrosc 200730 o 102 patients treated with a Modified Latarjet with glenoid bone loss o All had “inverted pear” Glenoid (arthroscopically measured) o 5 of 102 patients à recurrence (4.9%) • Boileau et al Arthrosc 200731 o Arthroscopic Bristow procedure; transfer of coracoid with conjoint and a repair of the capsulolabral structures o 8% failures of 36 patients total o Provencher et al Arthrosc 2008 o Anatomic osteochondral allograft reconstruction for glenoid bone deficiency using distal tibia allograft o Basic science work has demonstrated excellent congruence and similar radius of curvature across numerous specimens • How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Kang RW, Frank RM, Nho SJ, et al. Complications associated with anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy. Aug 2009;25(8):909-920. Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. Aug 1 2006;88(8):1755-1763. Tauber M, Resch H, Forstner R, Raffl M, Schauer J. Reasons for failure after surgical repair of anterior shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. May-Jun 2004;13(3):279285. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. Oct 2000;16(7):677-694. Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. May 2003;85-A(5):878-884. Saito H, Itoi E, Sugaya H, Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Tuoheti Y. Location of the glenoid defect in shoulders with recurrent anterior dislocation. Am J Sports Med. Jun 2005;33(6):889-893. Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Yung PS, et al. Prevalence, pattern, and spectrum of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation: CT analysis of 218 patients. AJR American journal of roentgenology. May 1 2008;190(5):1247-1254. Bigliani LU, Newton PM, Steinmann SP, Connor PM, McLlveen SJ. Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 1998;26(1):41-45. Lo IK, Parten PM, Burkhart SS. The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopy. Feb 2004;20(2):169-174. Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 2000;82(1):35-46. Garth WP, Slappey CE, Ochs CW. Roentgenographic demonstration of instability of the shoulder: the apical oblique projection. A technical note. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. Dec 1 1984;66(9):1450-1453. Roukos J, Feagin J. Modified axillary roentgenogram: A useful adjunct in the diagnosis of recurrent instability of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;82:84-86. Itoi E, Lee SB, Amrami KK, Wenger DE, An KN. Quantitative assessment of classic anteroinferior bony Bankart lesions by radiography and computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 2003;31(1):112-118. Huijsmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, van der Hulst VP, Willems WJ. Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [et al]. Jan 1 2007;16(6):803-809. Huysmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, Willems JW. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [et al]. Jan 1 2006;15(6):759-763. Mologne TS, Provencher MT, Menzel KA, Vachon TA, Dewing CB. Arthroscopic Stabilization in Patients With an Inverted Pear Glenoid: Results in Patients With Bone Loss of the Anterior Glenoid. Am J Sports Med. Mar 26 2007. How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM, Parten PM. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. May-Jun 2002;18(5):488-491. Kralinger F, Aigner F, Longato S, Rieger M, Wambacher M. Is the bare spot a consistent landmark for shoulder arthroscopy? A study of 20 embalmed glenoids with 3dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction. Arthroscopy. Apr 2006;22(4):428432. Provencher MT, Detterline AJ, Ghodadra N, et al. Measurement of glenoid bone loss: a comparison of measurement error between 45 degrees and 0 degrees bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations. Am J Sports Med. Jun 1 2008;36(6):1132-1138. Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Kanisawa I, Tsuchiya A. Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Aug 2005;87(8):1752-1760. Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Kanisawa I, Tsuchiya A. Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. Surgical technique. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. Sep 1 2006;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:159169. Pagnani MJ. Open Capsular Repair Without Bone Block for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients With and Without Bony Defects of the Glenoid and/or Humeral Head. Am J Sports Med. Apr 30 2008. Tauber M, Moursy M, Eppel M, Koller H, Resch H. Arthroscopic screw fixation of large anterior glenoid fractures. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. Mar 1 2008;16(3):326-332. Haaker RG, Eickhoff U, Klammer HL. Intraarticular autogenous bone grafting in recurrent shoulder dislocations. Military medicine. Mar 1 1993;158(3):164-169. Warner JJ, Gill TJ, O'hollerhan JD, Pathare N, Millett PJ. Anatomical glenoid reconstruction for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with glenoid deficiency using an autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft. Am J Sports Med. Feb 1 2006;34(2):205-212. Hutchinson JW, Neumann L, Wallace WA. Bone buttress operation for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation in epilepsy. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. Nov 1 1995;77(6):928-932. Auffarth A, Schauer J, Matis N, Kofler B, Hitzl W, Resch H. The J-bone graft for anatomical glenoid reconstruction in recurrent posttraumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Am J Sports Med. Apr 1 2008;36(4):638-647. Porcellini G, Paladini P, Campi F, Paganelli M. Long-term outcome of acute versus chronic bony Bankart lesions managed arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med. Dec 1 2007;35(12):2067-2072. Rhee YG, Lim CT. Glenoid defect associated with anterior shoulder instability: results of open Bankart repair. International orthopaedics. Oct 1 2007;31(5):629-634. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF, Barth JR, et al. Results of modified Latarjet reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior instability and significant bone loss. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. Oct 1 2007;23(10):10331041. Boileau P, Bicknell RT, El Fegoun AB, Chuinard C. Arthroscopic Bristow procedure for anterior instability in shoulders with a stretched or deficient capsule: the "belt-andsuspenders" operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy : the journal of How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 32. 33. 34. 35. Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. Jun 1 2007;23(6):593601. Provencher MT, Mologne TS, Hongo M, Zhao K, Tasto JP, An KN. Arthroscopic versus open rotator interval closure: biomechanical evaluation of stability and motion. Arthroscopy. Jun 2007;23(6):583-592. Mologne TS, Michio H, Zhao K, An KN, Provencher MT. The Addition of Rotator Interval Closure after Arthroscopic Repair of either Anterior or Posterior Shoulder Instability: Impact of Glenohumeral Translation and Range of Motion. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008;TBD(In Print). Plausinis D, Bravman JT, Heywood C, Kummer FJ, Kwon YW, Jazrawi LM. Arthroscopic rotator interval closure: effect of sutures on glenohumeral motion and anterior-posterior translation. Am J Sports Med. Oct 2006;34(10):1656-1661. Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Tuoheti Y, et al. Effect of rotator interval closure on glenohumeral stability and motion: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Nov-Dec 2006;15(6):750-758. Additional Reading and Resources 1. Piasecki D, Ghodadra N, Bach BR, Romeo AA, Provencher MT. The diagnosis and management of glenoid bone loss in recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2009; 17(8):482-493. 2. Seroyer S, Nho S, Provencher MT, Romeo AA. Four-Quadrant Approach to Capsulolabral Repair: An Arthroscopic Roadmap to The Glenoid. Arthroscopy (In Press). 3. Detterline AJ, Provencher MT, Ghodadra N, Bach BR, Verma N, Romeo AA. A novel measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss; correlation measurements of the inverted pear glenoid. Arthroscopy 2009. In print. 4. Grumet R, Ghodadra N, Romeo AA, Bach BR Jr., Provencher MT. Recurrent shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update, Online 7(9); http://www5.aaos.org/oko/description.cfm?topic=SHO032. Accessed September 2, 2009. 5. Provencher MT, Ghodadra N, LeClere L, Bach BR, Solomon DJ, Romeo AA. Anatomical osteochondral glenoid reconstruction for recurrent glenohumeral instability with glenoid deficiency using a distal tibia allograft. Arthroscopy 2009;25(4)446-452 6. Kang RW, Frank R, Nho S, Ghodadra N, Verma NN, Romeo AA, Provencher MT. Complications Associated with Anterior Shoulder Instability Repair. Arthroscopy 2009; 25(8):909-920. 7. Provencher MT, Detterline AJ, Ghodadra N, Romeo AA, Bach BR, Cole BJ, Verma N. Measurement of glenoid bone loss: A comparison of measurement error between 45° and 0° bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008; 36(6):1132-1138. How to do a Latarjet Procedure AANA Fall Course 2013 Provencher MT, Frank RM MGH Sports Boston MA 8. Schroder DT, Provencher MT, Mologne TS, Cox JS. The modified Bristow Procedure for anterior shoulder instability: 26-year outcomes in Naval Academy Midshipmen. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2006;34(5):778-786. 9. Mologne TS, Provencher MT, Menzel KA, Bell SJ. Arthroscopic stabilization of patients with glenoid bone deficiency. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2007;35(8)1276-1283. 10. Provencher MT, Ghodadra N, Romeo AA, Solomon DJ. Characterization of anterior shoulder instability. AAOS Annual Meeting Multimedia Presentation, New Orleans, LA, 2010. 11. Ghodadra N, Grumet R, Mologne TS, Bach BR, Romeo AA, Provencher MT. The diagnosis and management of glenoid bone loss. AAOS Annual Meeting Scientific Exhibit, New Orleans, LA, 2010. 12. Provencher MT. Pearls and pitfall in the surgical treatment of recurrent instability of the shoulder – techniques and bailouts. AAOS Annual Meeting Multimedia Presentation, Las Vegas, NV 2009. 13. Provencher MT, Solomon DJ. The diagnosis, measurement, and treatment of shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone loss. AAOS Annual Meeting Multimedia Presentation, Las Vegas, NV 2009. 14. Provencher MT, LeClere LE, Ghodadra N, Solomon DJ. Postsurgical glenohumeral anchor arthropathy treated with a fresh distal tibia allograft to the glenoid and a fresh allograft to the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Sep;19(6):e6-11. Epub 2010 Jun 15. 15. Provencher MT, Ghodadra N, LeClere L, Solomon DJ, Romeo AA. Anatomic osteochondral glenoid reconstruction for recurrent glenohumeral instability with glenoid deficiency using a distal tibia allograft. Arthroscopy. 2009 Apr;25(4):446-52. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
© Copyright 2019