Building strategic partnerships between teachers’ unions and NGOs

The need for quality teachers to achieve EFA
Building strategic partnerships
between teachers’ unions
and NGOs
CONTENTS
Preface
4
Section 1
The context: challenges facing public education
5
Section 2
Rationale for deepening partnership between
unions and NGOs
7
Section 3
Critical issues for convergence
10
3
3.1
Macro-economics and education
10
3.2
Addressing the question of non-professionals
13
3.3
Gender and education
15
3.4
HIV and education
16
3.5
School-level governance
17
3.6
Privatisation and public education
18
3.7
Building a code of ethics
18
Section 4
Conclusions
19
Annex 1:
Participants
20
Annex 2:
Background information
21
PREFACE
ovrty senior Education International (EI) and
F
Since Dakar some progress has been made. Today
ActionAid (AAI) representatives from across India,
there are 20 million fewer children out of school than
Nepal, Nigeria, Malawi, Tanzania, Cote d’Ivoire,
in 2000. But at this mid-term point we are still a long
Burkina Faso, Senegal and Brazil met in the Parktonian
way from achieving the EFA goals – and it will take new
Hotel, Johannesburg, South Africa, over three days in
forms of partnership to make the big breakthroughs that
April 2006. This publication is a composite text of the
are needed. There is an urgent need to build stronger
working paper produced for the meeting and the
national education coalitions and campaigns around
recommendations adopted at the end of the meeting.
the world. NGOs and unions have mutually reinforcing
strengths. Together we can build truly formidable
4
In the meeting there was a clear convergence of political
platforms, placing education at the top of the political
understanding that served to build strong relationships
agenda. Together we can ensure that the call for quality
of trust between the teachers’ union and ActionAid
public education based on quality teachers is
delegates. It became clear that Education International
heard everywhere.
and ActionAid share a deep passion for securing quality
basic education for all. Both organisations see education
We call on all teachers’ unions and NGOs to deepen
as a fundamental right and as a defining responsibility of
dialogue and cooperation. We hope that this paper
governments. Both recognise that achieving quality
helps to map out some of the ways in which this can
education depends more than anything on the availability
be done.
of quality teachers. We see the commitments in the
Dakar Framework of Action on Education For All (EFA),
and the education Millennium Development Goals drawn
from that, as key reference points, to which all
governments should be held accountable.
We believe that the dialogue that started at the
Parktonian meeting needs to be extended to the country
level, involving all teachers’ unions and NGOs committed
to EFA. This paper lays out some of the reasons why
building trust between teachers’ unions and education
NGOs has not been easy. It then goes on to identify
a series of issues around which joint work can be
(and is being) developed.
SECTION 1
The context:
challenges facing
public education
ver one billion people, the majority of them
0
gender parity in primary and secondary education by
women, lack a basic education. At least 77
2005. The rights of girls and women to education seem
million children are out of school, the majority
to be all too easily overlooked.
go to primary school (either through user fees or other
In order to achieve the Education For All goals, there
charges) and this has a particular impact on girls’ access
needs to be a huge increase in spending on education
to education. In many countries, International Monetary
over the next 10 years. Education systems will need to
Fund (IMF) macro-economic constraints are undermining
absorb the 77 million children presently out of primary
the capacity of the state to educate its citizens, whilst
school (let alone those excluded from secondary school)
donor practices are diminishing accountability and
as well as respond to population growth. Class sizes in
transparency. Privatisation is accelerating and
many countries need to be reduced (to at least 40 to 1)
undermining the contract between State and citizen.
to ensure quality education. The impact of HIV/AIDS on
of them girls. In 92 countries children have to pay to
While schools have the potential to transform pupils'
the teaching profession also needs to be factored in.
lives for the better, in reality they often reproduce the
At present, 75% of high prevalence countries have no
injustices and inequalities found outside their doors.
plans to train more teachers to cope with staff losses1.
Too often children are crammed inhumanely in classes
The effects of low wages must also be considered, as
of a hundred, whilst trained teachers remain unemployed
teachers from poor countries, such as Nigeria, Ethiopia
by governments whose hands are tied. Yet education
and Bangladesh, leave the systems that trained them
saves lives. Each year that a child (especially a girl) stays
and migrate to work in the North.
in school their risk of HIV infection reduces. According
to the Global Campaign for Education, if all children
Quality teachers are essential to quality education
completed a primary education 700,000 lives a year
but this requirement is being ignored. Indeed, many
would be saved.
governments are undertaking the large-scale recruitment
of non-professional, para-professional or contract
The Dakar Framework for Action on Education, agreed
teachers. Neo-liberal policies imposed by the IMF leave
in 2000, offers a vision for a better future, setting goals
governments with few alternatives, as constraints are
to achieve Education For All by 2015. But the global
placed on public spending, often including explicit limits
community has failed shamefully to follow up its pledges
on public sector pay.2 Governments are faced with
with adequate resources. A high-level meeting of donors
a direct contradiction. They are under international
convened in Brussels in May 2007 and committed to
pressure to expand primary school enrolments but
“Keeping Our Promises on Education”, delivered less
at the same time they are under even more powerful
than 1% of the estimated $16 billion in aid needed to
international pressure to limit public spending and avoid
achieve the goals. We already know that 90 countries
employing more teachers. The result is predictable, with
failed to reach the Millennium Development Goal of
governments either:
1 See Deadly Inertia, GCE 2006
2 See “Contradicting Commitments” by AAI/GCE 2005 and “Confronting the Contradictions”,
AAI 2007. These reports show how the IMF’s disputed definition of macroeconomic
stability focuses on low single-digit inflation rates and fiscal deficits, discouraging public
spending on education – which is seen as “consumption” not as “investment”.
5
•
•
•
•
imposing wage freezes;
These sensitive issues need to be addressed directly
imposing recruitment freezes (and accepting large
if we want to build really strong national coalitions and
class sizes);
campaigns. This is crucial because it is becoming
introducing contract-teachers (who can be hired and
increasingly clear that national governments will not
fired at will); or
deliver on their promises unless there is a strong,
bringing non-professionals into the workforce (with
coordinated domestic constituency that can hold them
few qualifications and low salaries).
accountable. The stakes are high and the challenges
3
In many cases these policies are being actively
are great. The ideal of education as an equalising force
advocated by donors, most notably the World Bank.
in society is coming under direct threat. People are
The Fast Track Initiative’s unjustified guideline on
encouraged to give up all hope of building a unitary
teachers’ salary levels contributes to the pressure on
public education system that guarantees quality
some governments to consider low-cost alternatives
education for all. Faced with this, those who still believe
to qualified teachers.
in quality public education need to stand together and
build new alliances.
Unfortunately, many NGOs are implicated in these
6
policies, running non-formal education (NFE) centres
This is why Education International and ActionAid have
or community schools and recruiting contract or para-
taken a strong stand, arguing that NGOs should not take
teachers, in order to improve access and retention in
on a service delivery role - absolving governments of
remote areas. Under financial pressure, governments
their central responsibility to deliver on the right to
have seized on these examples to justify recruiting non-
education. Together we want to encourage others to join
professionals into the formal education system. In some
us in making a vocal stand in defence of quality public
cases this is done on a massive scale. For example, at
education, building stronger platforms or coalitions at a
least 500,000 non-professional teachers have been
national and international level to oppose policies such
recruited in India in recent years. This situation has led
as the use of non-professionals. There are many other
to:
critical issues on which teachers’ unions and NGOs can
•
•
distrust between unions and NGOs;
work together effectively – this paper touches on some
the creation of a parallel and informal labour market
of these.
that undermines the status of professional teachers;
•
the division of the teaching population and
consequently the weakening of the capacity of
teacher’s unions to engage in effective collective
bargaining at national level;
•
the spread of low-quality and unregulated private
schools targeting poor parents (as schools can
operate at very low cost paying non-professional
teachers very low wages);
•
a deterioration in the quality of education and the
integrity of the public education system.
3 We have used the term non-professional though some people may refer to this group
as “para-teachers” or “local teachers”.
SECTION 2
Rationale for deepening
partnership between
unions and NGOs
he need for a strong collective response in
T
been as vocal as they could. There are continuing
defence of public education has never been
tensions and mistrust in many countries. There are also
greater than it is today. We need to be creative in
cultural differences in the ways in which the unions and
our response to the challenges, bringing different voices
NGOs work. They have different capacities and different
together through new platforms and alliances.
approaches. Whilst a level of cooperation is achieved
around key moments like the GCE Global Week of
Globally, remarkable progress has been made in the
Action, these connections often fail to endure
past eight years, with the emergence of the Global
through the year.
Campaign for Education, which has kept education
high on the global agenda. GCE was formed in 1999 by
Education International, ActionAid, Oxfam and the Global
March Against Child Labour. It took off rapidly, using the
Dakar World Conference on EFA in April 2000 as a
springboard for action. Many national coalitions formed
Global Action Week: Over 5 million people are
mobilised in over 120 countries during the annual
week of action. In 2005 the uniting slogan was “Send
My Friend to School”. In 2006 it was “Every Child
Needs a Teacher” and in 2007 the rallying cry was
under the inspiration of GCE, to put pressure on their
“Education Rights: Join Up Now”. Unions and NGOs
governments to critically review progress towards the
have indeed joined up for specific events during
EFA goals set in 1990 in Jomtien and framed for
these weeks – but in most countries this has not
achievement in 2000. There was an intensive process
evolved into an enduring partnership or a truly
of lobbying and campaigning that led to a Framework
trusting relationship. The time is ripe to take the
for Action emerging from Dakar, which was clearly
next step and forge closer links.
influenced by GCE and was seen to offer a positive way
forward. Tom Bediako from EI (a senior teachers’ union
activist, now retired) warned global leaders in the final
What then are the obstacles? Partly, there is the burden
plenary session that civil society would be keeping an
of history and partly a set of prejudices that need to be
eye on governments to ensure they delivered on their
overcome. To explore this, a few sweeping
promises. GCE has maintained that pressure since
generalisations and stereotypes might help…
2000, growing rapidly to gain a high international profile.
A major priority of GCE has always been to link the
Teachers’ unions perceive NGOs as politically naïve,
NGOs and unions in each country and this is a requirement
as opportunists who lack a credible base. To whom are
for all national coalitions that seek to affiliate to GCE.
NGOs accountable? No one. It is galling to the unions
to see NGOs invited to the policy table with national
However, the national links between NGOs and
government, especially when unions themselves are
unions have often been relatively superficial. Whilst there
often excluded. The unions have seen the proliferation of
are some positive exceptions, the coalitions are often
NGOs in recent years with some alarm – almost as part
dominated by NGOs and the teachers’ unions have not
of the neo-liberal agenda. It is as if NGOs are facilitating
7
the privatisation of poverty and responses to poverty.
involvement. But critical evaluations of this work have
NGOs have often undermined public sector services,
raised serious concerns. NGOs are rarely a permanent
creating parallel provision and absolving governments
presence in the communities where they work and so
of their responsibility. As such, NGOs have undermined
after a few years most of them planned to hand over
people’s rights to quality education. Most worryingly,
responsibility for their education centres to the
NGOs have undermined the status of professional
government. But often governments were reluctant to
teachers by employing non-professional teachers in
take on the centres. Indeed, in districts where NGOs
non-formal education centres. This opened the way
were running such centres the government would often,
for governments to justify the recruitment of non-
quite rationally, reduce its own investments in order to
professional teachers on a larger scale.
channel scarce resources elsewhere. The end result was
that when NGOs withdrew, the centres would close and
8
In return NGOs have their own prejudices about
local people would struggle to re-engage the government.
professional teachers and teachers’ unions. In rural areas
In responding to people’s immediate needs, NGOs found
they lament that teachers never turn up at school, or just
themselves actually undermining their rights, increasing
turn up for three days a week. Sometimes NGOs accuse
the distance between them and government services.
teachers of being lazy, bureaucratic and self-interested.
Other problems included a lack of coherent planning –
Teachers’ unions are sometimes seen by NGOs as self-
with NGO centres clustered in some locations and
interested and bureaucratic – concerned only with the
absent in others. Whilst some NGO centres were very
salaries and conditions of teachers, and unwilling to
good, some were bad – there was very little quality
reform. Some NGOs see union leaders as
control. Besides, it became clear that NGO service
unrepresentative of their members, making false claims
provision could only ever be a drop in the ocean. Even
about their membership. Often unions are seen as party-
in a context like Bangladesh where BRAC attracts huge
political or co-opted in one way or another – lacking an
donor support, their 35,000 centres only ever reached
independent voice. They are seen as pursuing agendas
8% of the population.
that have little to do with improving the quality of
education for all children.
As a result, many NGOs have recognised that the real
challenge lies in reforming the government system. The
These stereotypes of course represent a gross
political naivety of the past has given way to a greater
exaggeration. Not all NGOs are the same and not all
understanding of the national and international context
unions are the same. Some of the biggest critics of
in which NGOs operate. The importance of reinforcing
NGOs are within NGOs themselves and some of the
the responsibility of the State and the capacity of
biggest critics of unions are within unions.
governments to deliver on rights is now centre-stage.
But this is not uniform. Some NGOs continue to run NFE
Many NGOs have changed dramatically in recent
centres and this continuing practice has prolonged the
years, moving away from direct service delivery and
legacy of distrust between teachers’ unions and NGOs.
adopting a rights-based approach. In the past, many
From the teachers’ union perspective, these centres
NGOs were involved in running NFE centres or
have undermined the professional status of teachers,
community schools – seeing this as an essential
paving the way for the World Bank and governments
response to the basic needs of poor communities where
to employ non-professionals on a large scale.
large numbers of children were not reached by the
government system. These centres usually employed
Trade unions have also been through an evolution in
local people as teachers and taught a reduced
their approach to the wider development agenda. Many
curriculum, often in the mother tongue, using child-
unions have not, in the past, considered themselves to
centred methods and encouraging active community
be part of “civil society” and have focused closely on
collective bargaining, addressing the conditions of
•
Our strengths are complementary. Teachers’ unions
service and salaries of their members. This is changing,
have a clear base and authority that arises from
as the context of globalisation and rampant neo-liberalism
representation of their members. Many NGOs have
presents new challenges. Unions have come to recognise
developed an expertise in policy analysis, lobbying
the need to address wider development issues, especially
and campaigning especially around financing.
the constraints on national policies and budgets. As this
•
Teachers’ unions and a growing number of NGOs
wider agenda becomes more important, unions are
oppose the creation of parallel systems and the
recognising the need to link with wider civil society.
privatisation of education.
•
NGOs and unions recognise the major challenge
As unions are taking on a wider agenda, some have
of HIV/AIDS – both the impact the pandemic has
changed their internal governance in ways that will
on education and the role that education plays
enable them to build new links. There are changes in
in addressing HIV/AIDS.
internal flows of communication between the leadership
•
Unions and NGOs are both engaged in the EFA
and grassroots, and external communication with new
debates at multiple levels from local to national,
partners. Education International is in the forefront of the
regional to global – and often find themselves
global union movement, expanding the roles of unions
in the same spaces.
and their engagement with a wider agenda by promoting
•
There are many shared convictions: that education
internal democracy, increasing involvement in
should be higher up the political agenda, that
development issues at national and international level
financing constraints need to be addressed and
and through campaigning, advocacy and lobbying work.
that the key to sustainable progress is to make
public schools work.
With NGOs and unions in a process of change, there
is a real opportunity to overcome the legacy of distrust
In the next sections we outline in more detail some areas
between them. There are many reasons for working
where collaboration between unions and NGOs could be
together to build stronger partnerships in the future:
deepened to great effect:
•
•
The threats to quality public education have never
been greater.
•
Collectively our voice will always be stronger on
those issues on which we agree to work together.
•
We need to build stronger national coalitions on EFA
to hold governments accountable and to achieve this
we need to build greater trust between unions
and NGOs.
5 This initial list was generated in the AAI / EI meeting in the Parktonian, Johannesburg
South Africa, April 2006
to challenge unjustifiable macro-economic constraints
to education budgets;
•
•
•
•
•
•
to challenge the spread of non-professional teachers;
to address violence against girls in schools;
to respond to HIV and AIDS;
to develop joint positions on school governance;
to confront privatisation and defend public education;
to advance a code of ethics.5
9
PART 3
Critical issues for
convergence
3.1
Macro-economics and education:
challenging the IMF
In many other countries with an IMF loan arrangement,
the Fund does not directly require a wage bill ceiling.
Instead it targets single-digit inflation rates and low
fiscal deficit levels, effectively limiting the size of the
The UNESCO Institute of Statistics estimates that 18
government budget relative to gross domestic product
million new teachers are needed globally between now
(GDP), including the budget for teachers. Based on
and 2015 to get all children into school in acceptable
these overall budgetary restrictions, the Ministry of
class sizes. At least 2.4 million new teachers will be
Finance may set specific ‘caps’ on the number of
needed in sub-Saharan Africa. Some countries will have
teachers and health workers that can be hired.
to increase teacher numbers by more than 20% year-on-
10
year (EFA GMR 2006). Thousands of new classrooms
However, the formula used in setting the ceilings remains
will have to be built and millions of new textbooks
unclear. Do the Ministry of Finance and the IMF assess
printed. It is clear that massive new investments need
the number of teachers needed to ensure quality
to be made. But it is equally clear that this growth in
education? Is there any analysis of rising enrolment
spending is impossible under the present macro-
rates in primary and secondary schools? Is there any
economic regime. The IMF dominates present macro-
consideration of the impact of these ceilings, especially on
economic practices, either through conditions it imposes
how they discourage girls’ schooling and compromise
on countries in exchange for loans, or through its
long-term development goals? It seems not. Recent
success in getting Ministries of Finance to internalise
research in Mozambique, Malawi and Sierra Leone6
fundamentalist monetarist economics.
showed that the Ministry of Education is not consulted
by the IMF. Rather the Ministry of Education is simply
A recent IMF working paper (Fedelino et al, 2006)
told, after the decision has been taken, how many new
showed that between 2003 and 2005, the IMF imposed
teachers can be hired. As a senior education official
some conditionality on the public sector wage bill
in Sierra Leone explained, “It is the ceiling that dictates
in half of the 42 countries studied; 17 of these faced
how many more teachers we can hire. Schools tell
quantitative ceilings on the wage bill, and for eight the
us their needs, but we are rarely able to meet
ceiling was a ‘hard’ condition, a performance criterion
those requests.”
that could cause an interruption in the IMF programme
if breached. Conditionality is concentrated in sub-
Despite compelling evidence that education is one of the
Saharan Africa and Central America: Benin, Burkina
soundest long-term economic investments a country can
Faso, Burundi, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo,
make, the IMF regards spending on education simply as
Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger,
“consumption” not as “productive investment”. Their
Senegal, Sierra Leone, Zambia, Nepal, Azerbaijan,
obsession with short-term macro-economic stability
Tajikistan, Dominica, Guyana, Honduras and Nicaragua.
(over three to five years) and dogmatic attachment to
inflation targets under 5%, prevents countries from
making strategic long-term investments which could
be essential for economic growth.
6 Confronting the Contradictions: The IMF, Wage Bill Caps and the Case for Teachers.
ActionAid 2007
The impact of these constraints on wage bills is clear.
In Kenya, for example, the government implemented
in some other contexts.
•
Employing non-professional teachers – paying
free primary education in 2003. As a result, enrolment
people with few or no qualifications a third of a
rates soared from 5.8 million in 2002 to 7.1 million in
proper teacher’s salary, such as in India where at
2004. However, in 1997 the IMF had set a cap on
least 220,000 non-professionals have now been
the number of teachers the government of Kenya can
introduced leading to major concerns about quality.
employ – limited at 235,000 teachers. Even when
The status of teachers is undermined and the
enrolment rose dramatically, the cap was not lifted and
bargaining power of teachers’ unions is destroyed,
the government was not allowed to recruit more
as non-professionals are not allowed to unionise.
teachers. Class sizes rose dramatically and in rural
schools pupil-teacher ratios (PTRs) reached excessive
This last solution is the one most actively supported
levels, with teachers facing classrooms of over a
by the World Bank. Independent country studies
hundred children. The quality of education plummeted.
undertaken in 2005/6 as part of a review of the World
Bank’s investments in primary education since 1990
IMF pressures on wage bills lead governments to
(by the Independent Evaluation Group) showed that
choose one of four options:
the World Bank has supported the spread of “para-
•
Limiting teacher numbers – Kenya needs 60,000
professional” teachers in many countries. Reports from
new teachers to deal with rising enrolments but
Mali, Pakistan and Peru revealed how the pay, status
teacher numbers are frozen at 1997 levels. Nepal is
and conditions of teachers have fallen in recent years.
not allowed to employ any more teachers until 2009
The Bank refused to address this and refused to cover
even though enrolment campaigns have recently
recurrent costs such as teacher salaries – even when it
meant 200,000 more children are in school.
was clear that this was what countries most desperately
•
Freezing teacher wages – often driving wages
needed. Teacher salaries make up the vast bulk of the
below the level at which teachers can make a living
education budget and if donors refuse to use their
and thus contributing to a brain drain from countries
funding for this then they are meddling at the margins.
like Ghana, Ethiopia and Bangladesh to Europe or
•
the US. Sierra Leone has agreed to decrease its
Rather than invest in urgently needed professional
wage bill from 8.4% to 5.8% of GDP by 2008.
teachers, the World Bank has used such situations to
Employing only “contract teachers” on short-term
promote the use of non-professional teachers as the
contracts – whether the 2-year contract (with no
only viable solution for countries. They have supported
benefits and lower pay) now routinely offered to
the closing of teacher training colleges or the reduction
teachers in Nigeria or 10-month contracts offered
of training courses (e.g. from two to one year). Most
Malawi7
•
The Ministry of Education continues to struggle
countries studied: 27% and 32% respectively. To
with the aftermath of the launch of free primary
provide quality primary education, the PTR needs
education in 1994. The government initially
to fall to 40:1 by 2015, which would require
responded to the huge increase in demand by
government to hire 94,777 teachers. At the
hiring 22,000 untrained teachers. Only a handful of
moment 45,268 teachers are employed.
additional new teachers have been hired since
•
•
There continues to be a wage bill ceiling at 7.2%
then, as no new teachers have received pre-
of GDP. Inflation is targeted to decrease to 5%,
service training in the last 10 years.
and the fiscal deficit target is expected to fall to
Enrolment rates have continued to rise. As a
0% by 2009. Ambitiously, the government hopes to
result, the quality of education is poor. The PTR
meet these targets by limiting government
remains high at 72:1. Malawi has the lowest
expenditure to 39.5% of GDP. This will limit
completion rate for girls and boys of all three
expenditure on the wage bill – preventing the
recruitment of urgently needed teachers.
7 ibid.
11
especially they have supported schemes for the rapid
inflationary pressures. Even if they do accept aid money
recruitment of a new cadre of non-professionals.
for education, much of the money risks ending up in
Unfortunately the World Bank has not supported decent
reserves rather than being spent on education. A recent
training programmes for this new cadre nor invested in
Independent Evaluation Office report on the IMF showed
programmes to facilitate transition from such schemes.
that, where African countries have inflation rates over
For the World Bank, it seems, this is a permanent low
5%, up to 85% of aid risks ending up in reserves.8
cost solution – low-quality cheap labour to replace
professional teachers.
These absurd contradictions need to be exposed and
they need to be urgently resolved. But when challenged
The growing international pressure for countries to
about these issues the IMF response has been either:
abolish explicit user fees in primary education (which
•
To claim critics are extremists advocating high
governments in many countries have done, e.g. Kenya,
inflation that will be damaging to poor people. The
Tanzania, Uganda, Burundi, Malawi, Zambia) makes
IMF has a vicious media and rapid-response team
addressing the macro-economic constraints even more
who will make up stories to make it look as if you
urgent. When there are sudden increases in enrolments,
are being ideological, cleverly disguising their own
governments have to be able to respond by recruiting
ideologically driven agenda. It is important to ensure
more trained teachers. The alternative is to create a
that the focus is kept clearly on why the IMF pushes
situation where it is almost impossible for teachers to
for excessively low inflation and avoid a situation
teach and for children to learn – with absurdly large class
where we can be dismissed as advocates of
sizes and unacceptable working conditions for teachers.
high inflation.
Sadly this is the reality in many countries.
•
To argue that they always insist on “protecting”
education spending when negotiating with national
12
The control that the IMF, a single organization, retains
governments. However, when you hear the word
over the monetary and fiscal policies of other countries is
“protect” from the IMF you should read the word
astonishing. If countries do not abide by its policies, then
“freeze” because this is what they really mean. If an
all aid can and has been cut off. This raises major issues
education system is expanding (with more children
around North-South power relations:
enrolling) how do you cope if your budget is frozen?
•
•
Policies are not decided by national goals. Education
may be recognized as a fundamental right in the
In the 2006 Parktonian meeting between Education
Constitution, but this priority is not reflected in budget
International and ActionAid, the following
allocations because of the constraints imposed by
recommendations emerged for collaborative work
IMF policies.
between unions and NGOs on this critical issue:
As a result, policy space is severely limited, throwing
•
into question a country’s right to democratic
national-level studies to better understand how
governance and control over its own economy.
IMF policies constrain budgets and contradict
Parliaments are often not consulted on the
the achievement of education goals.
agreements made between the IMF and the Central
•
NGOs and unions should work together on
•
NGOs and unions should link up with wider
Bank and Ministry of Finance.
education coalitions nationally and
All this contributes to eroding the role of the state in
internationally (with the Global Campaign for
providing education.
Education) on this work.
•
Efforts should be made to build links with
Poor countries are under ever more international
parliamentarians (working with existing
pressure to reduce poverty, especially to invest in actions
committees or creating new ones) and to raise
to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. Yet the
public awareness through links to national
same international community is directly responsible for
media.
blocking this investment. There are even suggestions
•
that if large amounts of new aid are mobilized for
education (as promised by the G8), many countries will
not be allowed to accept it as to do so would increase
Connections should be made with work to
demystify and track education budgets.
•
Joint advocacy and campaigning should be
developed to place this issue at the centre of
national and international attention.
8 The IMF and Aid to Sub-Saharan Africa, IMF 2007
3.2
Addressing the question of
non-professionals
and 30% in South Asia are untrained). The active
promotion of non-professional teachers as a solution is
at its most vigorous and intensive in francophone West
Africa and South Asia, but there are similar approaches
As noted in the previous section, the World Bank is now
emerging in East and Central Africa and Latin America.
pushing the use of non-professional teachers as the only
This trend is likely to spread to many more countries in
way for many countries to deal with the macro-economic
the coming years unless a very strong stand is taken.
constraints.
The EFA Fast Track Initiative is part of the problem here,
both for having recommended a wage level for teachers
In April 2006 Adrian Verspoor, a World Bank education
set at 3.5% of GDP per capita (which has no credible
stalwart, presented two pieces of supposed “scientific
basis) and for then encouraging countries to calculate
research” to a major international conference in Africa
average salaries of teachers in a two-tier system (for
convened by ADEA. One piece of research claimed to
“civil service teachers” and “contract teachers”).
show that there was no link between teacher training
and learning outcomes. The other argued that there
NGOs are also partly to blame for creating this situation.
were no differences in learning outcomes in Africa when
NGOs, in their noble intention to improve access and
children were in classes of up to 60. The policy message
retention in remote areas, run non-formal education
to Ministers was clear: close down teacher training
centres or community schools, recruiting local people as
colleges, employ non-professionals and cram more
contract or para-teachers. Governments, under financial
children into each classroom. This is surely a recipe for
pressure (and sometimes with active support from the
disaster and represents the World Bank at its most
World Bank), have seized on these examples to justify
irresponsible – collecting policy-based evidence to justify
recruiting non-professionals into the formal education
ideological positions.
system. In some cases this is done on a massive scale
(see box on India).
This sort of positioning by the World Bank exacerbates
an already problematic situation where many teachers,
Education International is deeply concerned about this
especially in rural schools, are untrained (according to
situation and has initiated a dialogue with the World
the 2006 EFA GMR, 20% of primary teachers in Africa
Bank and others (ADEA, UNESCO), for example in
The case of para-teachers in India (from “Contradicting Commitments”, GCE 2005)
India provides a good example of how the
the underlying stated rationale. In some states, such
implementation of IMF policies can lead to the hiring of
schemes were seen as interim or exceptional measures,
para-teachers. After the launch of the World Bank
whereas in others they are long-term policy. Madhya
supported ‘District Primary Education Programme’ in
Pradesh comes in the latter category, where the regular
the 1990’s, India has witnessed a phenomenal rise in the
teacher cadre is disappearing. Gradually, the exception
number of para-teachers from primary to senior
appears to become the ‘norm’ all over the country.
secondary schools. The most recent figures from the
Often such a move is justified in financial terms; for one
Ministry of Human Resource Development record that
regular teacher’s salary, three to five para-teachers can
more than 220,000 para-teachers were engaged in full-
be appointed.
time regular schools during the period from 1994-1999.
In Andhra Pradesh – 35,000; Assam – 2,332; Gujarat –
However, there are now a large number of field studies
26,485; Himachal Pradesh – 10,961; Kerala – 385;
that suggest that such schemes have little merit. As
Madhya Pradesh – 1,18,000; Orissa – 380; West Bengal –
well as creating ‘dualism’ within public provision, the
8,065; Uttar Pradesh – 19,758; Rajasthan – 18,269. Given
damage to education quality has been huge. World
that this practice is now firmly entrenched in almost
Bank reports are completely contradictory to these field
every state of the country, the present count is likely to
studies and view Madhya Pradesh as providing “the
be substantially higher. Unofficial estimates put it in
most promising developments in primary education
excess of 500,000.
where communities have been allowed to hire informal
teachers at much lower wages than possible in the civil
Recruitment procedures and service conditions of these
service with much better performance in terms of
teachers vary considerably across the states, as does
attendance as well as educational outcomes”.
13
Bamako in November 2004. However, some World Bank
positive inputs don’t have a negative impact on the
people in this process are actively arguing for the
professional status of teachers? Teachers’ unions
benefits of non-professionals and there has not been a
in many countries have worked extensively on
strong coordinated stand against this. NGOs, who have
this question.
been part of the problem, have generally not taken a
strong public stand and yet clearly they should do so.
Teachers’ unions and progressive NGOs can develop
A united front between unions and NGOs on this issue
strong and clear positions on these questions, adapted
could make a real difference, focusing attention on the
to their national context. They can also play a key role
importance of a quality teacher for quality education.
in reaching out to many others, including other NGOs,
governments, bi-laterals and multilaterals to sign up to
For a collective voice to be heard clearly it is important
a code of good practice. Unless action is taken on this
for unions and NGOs in different countries to develop
question, the spread of non-professional teachers will
a comprehensive position on this key issue. A blanket
have a devastating impact on the teaching profession
“no” to non-professionals is unlikely to be effective.
as a whole. As non-professional teachers organize
Teachers’ unions and NGOs need to consider the
themselves into separate associations, existing teachers’
following, relating these to existing ILO standards:
unions will find their bargaining power diminished – so
•
What happens when user fees are abolished and
they will be unable to negotiate liveable wages, fair
enrolment rises suddenly? Or what happens post-
contracts and decent working conditions. Everyone
conflict when the education system needs to be
stands to lose from this, especially children.
rebuilt and there is a shortage of teachers. We need
14
•
to agree what measures are acceptable in such
The following recommendations emerged from the
emergency contexts to get a new cadre of people
Parktonian meeting in 2006 and may serve as a useful
into schools.
reference point for national discussions:
How is the transition from such situations to full
•
professionalisation best managed? What are
professional teachers. It is a violation of
reasonable timeframes and procedures? What are
children’s right to quality education and leads
the broad guidelines for acceptable practice in
to discrimination against poor children!
respect of in-service training and progressive
•
•
•
Government should be the employers of all
teachers in the public education system, with
What are the minimum rights (including union rights)
salaries set through national processes of
of non-professional teachers during transition
collective bargaining.
•
Governments should undertake workforce
conditions and what happens if these are violated?
planning from now to 2015 to determine the
How do we deal with situations where
number of teachers needed year-on-year to get
decentralization means communities employ non-
all children into school in acceptable class sizes
professional teachers for local schools (i.e. it is not
(and a practice of ten-year comprehensive
part of a central government scheme – even if
demographic-based education planning should
government policy creates the environment that
always be maintained). Governments should
makes this happen)?
then invest in significantly expanding teacher-
What happens when there is a real need to bring
training facilities to ensure that sufficient
new groups of people into the teaching profession,
numbers of professional teachers are trained.
for example women or people from certain minority
•
•
qualification for these groups?
periods? How do we guarantee acceptable working
•
There should be no more recruitment of non-
•
In situations of unexpected or rapid expansion
groups? What are acceptable changes to entry
(e.g. following abolition of user fees),
requirements to incentivise new groups into the
governments should first bring into the
teaching profession and how should such groups
workforce any unemployed trained teachers or
be supported?
retired professional teachers – and seek to
What changes are acceptable in response to
attract back into frontline teaching any trained
HIV/AIDS?
teachers who are otherwise employed. If there
What are the parameters within which parents and
is a remaining gap, then, in consultation with
other local people can the brought into schools as
teacher unions, emergency measures may be
teachers’ assistants? How can we ensure that
taken to bring in a temporary new cadre, who
•
should be given accelerated opportunities for
integrated into the professional workforce.
full professionalisation within a maximum of
They should be given access to quality distance
five years. Emergency measures may also be
education courses, backed up with face-to-face
needed in situations of conflict but there should
formal courses in vacations and school-level
be explicit plans for time-bound transition
mentoring and support, leading to public
agreed from the start.
examinations which must be achieved within
Clear agreements should be established on the
minimum standards for pre-service teacher
•
•
a maximum five-year timeframe.
•
There should be an end to single-teacher
training, with reference to ILO / UNESCO
schools. Progress should be made rapidly
standards. There is a need to improve the
towards having one teacher per grade, at least
quality of present teacher training provision and
one classroom per grade, adequate sanitation
to develop regulatory mechanisms to ensure all
facilities, and a balance of female and male
facilities deliver quality training.
teachers.
National teachers’ unions should actively
•
All teachers should have access to good
encourage existing non-professional teachers
quality professional development courses and
to become members.
ongoing training.
Existing non-professional teachers should be
3.3
Gender and education:
violence against girls
pressure to restructure their behaviour to conform to
what is considered culturally ‘appropriate’, so as not to
‘invite’ harassment. Moreover, cultures that maintain rigid
control over women’s sexuality are nervous about sexual
The majority of teachers’ unions and NGOs are
‘improprieties’ their daughter may commit and/or sexual
committed to challenging discrimination against women.
violence they may encounter on the way to school.
Most teachers’ unions have women’s committees and
Violence and the threat of sexual violence is a significant
most NGOs have staff working on women’s rights.
factor impeding girls’ access to education, especially
There are many areas where shared interest may
when the schools are at distance from their residences.
develop, for example around work on violence against
girls in schools, an issue taken up by women’s
Research shows that girls often bear the burden of
committees in many teachers’ unions and also a focus
housework and take on the role of caring for younger
of increasing attention by NGOs.
siblings; excessive housework impacts girls’
performance and attendance in schools as it results in
It is clear that these are sensitive issues and some
physical and mental fatigue. The same is true of girls
discussion of gender violence in schools can place the
employed as child labour. Girls’ absenteeism and poor
blame wrongly on teachers rather than systems, or
performance in schools in turn invites corporal
generalise from the example of a few bad teachers to
punishment and public shaming by school authorities
damage the reputation of all teachers. But Education
and teachers, which amplifies their disinclination to
International recognises that this is not a reason for
attend school. Early marriage and pregnancy have also
staying silent. By standing up against violations of trust
been identified as impediments to securing girls’
and talking directly about these issues, systems can be
education. These factors impact on girls’ education in
put in place that will protect both girls and teachers.
two ways. If she gets married or becomes pregnant, the
girl may find that her family and community circumscribe
For girls around the world, exercising the right to
her mobility and choices. In many cases, schools
education means putting themselves at risk of abuse.
themselves disallow married and pregnant students.
Girls are at risk on the journey to and from school, in the
It is also evident that girls of school-going age may be
classroom, in the school grounds, and in the family or
trafficked and/or coerced into prostitution. Poverty
community. Research shows that in many societies, girls
increases girls’ vulnerability to trafficking and
not only face sexual harassment but are also under
transactional sex with older men.
15
Even as we focus on violence in and around schools, it
To address these crucial issues we recommend that
is imperative to understand that violence in education
NGOs and unions should:
institutions is a mere reflection of violence in society. In
•
•
fact, the rate of violence in homes and communities is
Collaborate to break the silence on this issue.
Build conceptual understanding around the
often greater than violence in schools. In schools,
wide scope of direct and indirect violence
violence takes the form of aggressive sexual behaviour,
affecting girls at home, on the way to school
intimidation and physical assault by older boys; sexual
and in school.
advances by male teachers (even if this is rare); corporal
•
positions.
punishment and verbal abuse. Male sexual aggression in
schools, as in society, is normalized and girls respond
•
Ensure gender-based violence is addressed
seriously in teacher training colleges.
with resignation and passivity. By denying that abuse
and violence exists in schools, failing to institute policies
Undertake joint research and agree clear
•
Influence curriculum review processes to
and mechanisms that encourage reporting of abuse, and
ensure gender issues and gender violence are
failing to punish the perpetrators and redress
effectively covered.
victimisation, schools become complicit in the abuse.
•
Campaign jointly for zero tolerance towards
violence against girls and to ensure
9
A recent Model Policy on Violence Against Girls in
Schools was developed out of a southern African
meeting involving NGOs, unions, education coalitions
perpetrators of violence are brought to justice.
•
Ensure this is taken on by everyone and not just
by women or women’s committees.
and Ministries of Education. This provides a powerful
reference point for NGOs and unions seeking a
comprehensive response to the issue in their country.
16
3.4
HIV and education
with civil society education coalitions and HIV coalitions
in 20 countries. One possible area of common concern
for unions and NGOs lies in how we can place teachers
Many teachers’ unions and NGOs are also actively
at the centre of the response to HIV/AIDS and how we
engaged in work on HIV/AIDS and education. Education
can link this to work on gender inequality. Gender
International has cooperated with the World Health
inequality is a major driver of HIV/AIDS epidemics around
Organisation on teacher training programmes for
the world, as evidenced through the increasing
HIV/AIDS prevention in schools across 17 countries in
feminisation of the epidemic. The same gender inequality
Africa. The objective is to provide teachers with the skills
that makes girls sexually vulnerable is also keeping girls
necessary to prevent HIV infection for themselves, their
out of school, denying them the protection that
colleagues and students. The programme also enables
education offers.10
teachers to advocate for the role of schools in preventing
HIV infection and to raise awareness on a number of
The inter-play between gender inequality, education and
HIV-related issues, including antiretroviral therapy,
HIV is complex. Deep-rooted prejudices and underlying
voluntary testing, stigma and discrimination, etc. The
gender and power structures are embedded in schools
main goal of the programme is to have in each school of
as in wider society. Unless systematic steps are taken to
the countries involved, a trained teacher with valuable
transform schools, the potential for education to protect
expertise in HIV/AIDS.
girls and contribute to greater equality in society, will be
lost. Whilst there have been many initiatives to get
NGOs have also been active in addressing the interface
HIV/AIDS into national education policies and national
of HIV and education. ActionAid has represented the
curricula, the Deadly Inertia report by GCE showed very
Global Campaign for Education on the UNAIDS Inter-
little change in practices at the school level. The reason
Agency Task Team on Education and HIV/AIDS. In 2006
is clear. Teachers themselves are almost always
the GCE published “Deadly Inertia” based on interviews
9 See Model Policy, ActionAid / OSISA 2006
10 See Girl Power, ActionAid 2006
overlooked. Few teachers are trained adequately in using
The following recommendations outline a way forward:
new materials and even fewer feel confident to translate
•
Governments should make a more
comprehensive educational response to the
training into classroom practice.
pandemic and should recognise the important
role played by teachers’ unions.
EI’s work has started to reverse this trend in 17
countries, but much more could be done. There is a real
•
Workplace policies are urgently needed in all
need for new work linking effective education on
countries to defend the rights of teachers and
HIV/AIDS and effective approaches to promoting gender
students living with HIV.
equality in schools. Teachers need to be placed centre-
•
All pre-service teacher-training courses should
stage. If schools are to be transformed, the central
integrate significant core programmes on HIV
means to do so must be through the teachers who are
and related gender issues, using participatory
their life-blood.
methods.
•
programmes on HIV/AIDS are also required.
Most HIV/AIDS education or girls’ education
programmes tag on training for teachers as an after-
Closely evaluated in-service training
•
Unions and NGOs should work together on
thought, rather than making training and support to
research into the impact of HIV on education
teachers the heart of the programme. Refocusing our
and should work together to develop effective
energies on building the capacity of teachers to deal with
models for pre-service and in-service training.
difficult issues such as gender and HIV is the only way to
•
Increased engagement with parents and wider
create a school environment in which young people have
communities is needed to challenge stigma
the opportunity to critically assess historical gender
and discrimination.
inequalities and protect themselves from HIV. There is
plenty of scope here for collaboration between teachers’
unions and NGOs.
3.5
School-level governance
17
•
Play a strong advisory role to head teachers
and have clear links to district education
authorities and school inspectorates. They
Different structures of governance exist in different
should be empowered to register serious
countries. However, in the context of widespread
complaints against teachers (though not take
decentralisation it is important to recognise the role to be
played by school management committees (SMCs) or
governing bodies. Many NGOs have worked extensively
disciplinary actions directly themselves).
•
to make recommendations about budget
in this areas and it is clearly important that SMCs should
be systematically empowered. Equally, there are clear
limits to the powers they should be given. Teachers’
allocations (though not relating to salaries).
•
parents to be involved in the life of the school,
teachers or set salaries. Governments should be
including mobilising parents to support
responsible for employing teachers and salaries should
important for NGOs to recognise this – and this can be
teachers inside and outside the classroom.
•
Be representative of all parents and actors in
the local community (especially guaranteeing
the basis for the developing some strong consensus on
female participation), and have teachers’ union
the roles of SMCs. The Parktonian meeting
recommended that SMCs should:
Be active in strengthening relations with the
local community, linking with PTAs and enabling
unions are concerned that SMCs should not hire or fire
be set by national processes of collective bargaining. It is
Have oversight of school budgets and be able
representation.
•
Be facilitated to develop district and national
level platforms.
3.6
Privatisation and public education
manageable class sizes and better trained
teachers.
•
We should work together to fight for a common
Education is a fundamental right and a core government
school system which is genuinely free, to
responsibility. Public education, even where under-
ensure government schools work effectively
resourced, remains the most effective means to
and to win over parents so that they want to
guarantee quality education for all. Yet private education
send their children to public schools.
in multiple forms is on the rise everywhere, undermining
•
We should demand better regulation of private
the capacity for education to be an equalising force in
schools and an end to all government (and
society. NGOs and unions need to work together on this
international donor) subsidies to private schools
and the following recommendations from the
(and taxes on any profit-making institutions).
Parktonian meeting may offer a starting point for national
•
All teachers in private schools should be
dialogue:
governed by the same rules, regulations and
•
salary scales as government teachers.
The rise of private education should be actively
checked.
•
•
We should exchange information about
The key means to reverse the rise of private
negotiation processes in the WTO and jointly
schools is to improve the quality of public
lobby to oppose the inclusion of education in
schools - getting more teachers, better
GATS.
infrastructure, more resources, better salaries,
18
3.7
Building code of ethics
One final area where NGOs and unions can work
together concerns a code of ethics. This can build on
the existing work of Education International to develop
and popularise a code of ethics for teachers, which can
be internalised by all stakeholders. In this respect we
recommend that:
•
We should prioritise a positive code, which
has a collective character.
•
Our starting point should be the rights of
children to quality education and the
importance of building wider human values of
solidarity, a culture of peace and moral
behaviour, etc.
PART 4
Conclusions
his paper is a first attempt to map out issues
T
governments across Africa, Asia and Latin America are
where NGO and unions can work more closely
failing to prioritise public education and do not commit
together to ensure the achievement of quality
sufficient resources to the sector (most fail to reach the
public education for all. The initial positions have
recommended levels of 20% of national budgets being
emerged from joint analysis between affiliates of
earmarked for education). Only by building much
Education International and ActionAid. Much more could
stronger national education coalitions will we succeed in
be added by other NGOs – on a range of issues that are
holding governments accountable – and we can only do
not yet addressed, for example to explore collaboration
this by building deeper trust and cooperation between
between unions and NGOs in fragile states or on issues
NGOs and teachers’ unions.
of inclusive education. But this paper does not aim to be
exhaustive. Instead it aims to outline an initial common
If teachers’ unions and NGOs can overcome some
agenda for deepening trust in order to build stronger
of the past tensions between them and deepen trust
national regional and global campaigning in defence
around a common vision of quality public education for
of quality public education for all. The need has never
all, then national coalitions and campaigns on education
been greater.
can build into formidable platforms, drawing on the
mutually reinforcing strengths of NGOs and unions. The
The time is also right for a deepening of partnerships
power of this convergence has already been seen in the
between NGOs and unions. The donor community
Global Campaign for Education. Now is the time to build
continues to fail to live up to its promises on resourcing
the links at every level – from local through to national
for EFA (most recently in the disappointing donor
and regional – so that the call for quality public education
meeting in Brussels in May 2007). Moreover many
based on quality teachers is heard everywhere.
19
ANNEX 1:
Participants at the Education International/ActionAid
meeting in Johannesburg, April 2006
No
1
Country
Surname
Name
Organisation
Brazil
DUTRA VIEIRA
Juçara
EI/ CNTE
2
APARECIDA SILVA
Fatima
BABU
Mathieu
4
SETH
Niraj
5
ESWARAN
Subramanian
6
ARUN DONDE
Sulbha
3
7
India
Malawi
8
9
10
11
Nepal
Chris
Julita
CHIKADZA
Lucien
KAMPHONJE
Alfred
EI/ AIPTF
AAI
EI /TUM
C. REGMI
Shibesh
MATHEMA
Sujeeta
13
SINGH RAWAL
Jhapat
EI/ NNTA
14
PRAKASH SHRESTHA
Birendra
EI/ NTA
IGBUZOR
Otive
AI
16
ODEMWINGIE
Thomas
AAI
17
ABDULWAHED OMAR
Mallam Ibrahim
EI /NUT
18
OBONG
Ikpe Johnny
EI/NUT
12
20
KINIYANJUI
NSANJAMA
AAI
15
19
Nigeria
Senegal
20
21
Burkina
22
23
Tanzania
AAI
DIA
Aïssata
AAI
DIAOUNE
Amadou
EI/SUDES
OUEDRAOGO
Andre Richard
AAI/A&A
HIEN
Lambert
EI/SNEAB
MUSHI
Rose
AAI
24
MMARI
Tumsifu
AAI
25
KIGUHE
Mwandile
EI/TTU
26
MVANGU
Anthony John
EI/TTU
27
Togo
KANNAE
Lawrence
PATC
28
RSA
KENT
Alex
GCE
29
30
London
SANDE MUKULURA
Caroline
AAI/RSA
ARCHER
David
AAI/IET
31
MARPHATIA
Akanksha
AAI/IET
32
BOLER
Tania
AA/IET
AAI/IET
33
Nigeria
ALIYU
Balaraba
34
RSA
DJITRINOU
Victorine
AAI/IET
35
RSA
MOKOME
TSHEPISO
AAI/admin
36
Brussels
JOUEN
Elie
EI / DGS
37
CI
DOUMBIA
Salimata
EI/ IEB
38
Togo
FATOMA
Emanuel
EI/ARO
NAPOE
Assibi
EI/ARO
39
ANNEX 2:
Background information on Education International
and ActionAid
Education International represents more than 29 million
ActionAid is an international development agency whose
teachers and education workers. It seeks to improve the
aim is to fight poverty worldwide. Formed in 1972, it now
welfare and status of teachers and other education
works in 43 countries helping over 13 million of the world's
employees, protecting their human rights, their trade union
poorest and most disadvantaged people. ActionAid focuses
rights and their professional freedoms. It has 348 member
on helping people fight for and gain their rights to food,
organizations operating in 166 countries, covering
education, healthcare and a voice in the decisions that
education from pre-school to university. With its
affect their lives. It has an annual income of about 150
headquarters in Brussels, EI is the world’s largest global
million euros raised largely from 600,000 long-term
union federation, and the only one representing education
supporters across Europe. It employs about 2,000 staff,
workers in every corner of the globe. EI protects the rights
89% of who are from developing countries. In 2003,
of every teacher and education worker, and every student
ActionAid established a new head office in Johannesburg,
they educate. It assists in the development of democratic
South Africa, and began the process of making all country
organisations for teachers and other education workers and
programmes equal partners with an equal say. Its 2,000
it works to build solidarity & mutual co-operation.
partner organisations range from small community support
groups to national alliances and international networks
EI regards free quality public education as a fundamental
seeking education for all, trade justice, women’s rights and
human right for all and insists that this should be achieved
action against HIV/AIDS.
through the establishment, protection and promotion of
publicly funded and regulated systems of education that
ActionAid is a leading international NGO in the field of
provide equality of educational opportunity. It aims to
education. It is committed to working with excluded groups,
promote peace, democracy, social justice and equality
to ensure that they can secure their right to free quality
through the development of education and through the
education within an equitable system as a key means to
collective strength of teachers and education employees. It
end poverty. It supports struggles to secure constitutional
also promotes the political, social and economic conditions
rights to basic education where these are not in place, and
that are required for the realisation of the right to education
to ensure these rights are enforceable in practice. It
in all nations. Indeed, EI fosters a concept of education
pressurises governments and donors to dedicate adequate
directed towards international understanding and good will,
resources to ensure effective delivery of education for all. It
the safeguarding of peace and freedom, and respect for
seeks sustained and meaningful citizen participation ands
human dignity. It works to combat racism and discrimination
works to ensure that schools respect all children’s rights,
in education and in society and it gives particular attention
providing education that is empowering, relevant and of
to developing the leadership role and involvement of women
good quality. All of ActionAid’s education work seeks to
in society.
promote women’s rights and gender equality.
21
ActionAid international
is a unique partnership
of people who are
fighting for a better
world – a world
without poverty
ActionAid
PostNet suite #248
Private Bag X31
Saxonwold 2132
Johannesburg
South Africa
ActionAid International
is registered under
Section 21A of the
Companies Act 1973
David Archer
[email protected]
Registration number
2004/007117/10
Victorine Kemonou
[email protected]
Telephone
+27 (0) 11 731 4500
International Head Office
Johannesburg
Facsimile
+27 (0) 11 880 8082
Asia Region Office
Bangkok
Email
[email protected]
Africa Region Office
Nairobi
Website
www.actionaid.org
Americas Region Office
Rio de Janeiro
`